Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shameful Cowardly Hawai'ian Democrats - ERRONEOUSLY- (out of fear) - Killed Civil Unions Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:21 AM
Original message
Shameful Cowardly Hawai'ian Democrats - ERRONEOUSLY- (out of fear) - Killed Civil Unions Bill
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 11:22 AM by kpete
Shameful Cowardly Hawai'ian Democrats
by BooMan
Sat Jan 30th, 2010 at 11:00:35 AM EST

There's a strange procedural gap in the rules of the Hawai'i House of Representatives. Normally, representatives have the right to demand a roll call vote after a voice vote. But, in Hawai'i, the Vice Speaker of the House was able to erroneously rule that 'the noes have it,' and kill off an effort to pass a civil unions bill.

No roll call was taken on the decision to postpone the vote, which shielded representatives from having their positions on the record. Instead, lawmakers shouted "aye" or "no," and Vice Speaker of the House Michael Magaoay then ruled that the motion to delay a vote had passed.

The voice vote defers further action on the bill unless two-thirds of lawmakers vote to reconsider it; otherwise, Hawaii's debate on the issue is over for this year.

"You can call me a coward, but we are all not cowards. We'll make our tough decisions as we go ahead," Democratic Speaker of the House Calvin Say said he told civil union backers. "But members were concerned, and that was my role as the speaker to make that determination and decision to do what we did today."

Republican Gov. Linda Lingle had refused to say whether she would have vetoed a civil unions bill if lawmakers had approved it.

"Something so divisive at the beginning of session wouldn't be a good thing, so I'm glad they made that decision," Lingle said. http://www.wtop.com/?nid=104&sid=1865773


It might have been divisive, but they had the votes to pass it. The Senate had already passed the bill last week, and the House approved civil unions by a 33-18 margin in 2009. The Republican governor had made no commitment to veto. So, basically, the Democratic leadership decided not to extend rights to the LGBT community because a minority of their own members were uncomfortable or afraid. I think 'cowardice' is clearly the correct word to describe this.

more:
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2010/1/30/11035/0610



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Uncomfortable? Afraid? Or just bigots?
It's a sad day when "I'm afraid" is the option of choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. another shut up F** moment from democrats nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not surprised.
And it wasn't an act of cowardice. It was an abuse of power because of their own homophobia. Those individuals did it because they could
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC