Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's next speech should eviscerate the Rs about the role and function of government

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:04 AM
Original message
Obama's next speech should eviscerate the Rs about the role and function of government
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 09:12 AM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
He doesn't seem to know it, but he is undercutting any progress he might make in his own administration by buying into Right Wing deficit frames. Deficits only really matter when it's convenient for Republicans to scaremonger on in campaign mode while they actually drive UP costs as the end result of their privatization efforts and empire building. No better authority on that than Dick Cheney himself. Of course deficits do matter, but only up to a point and only in context. Who started with a surplus and turned it into a gigantic deficit in the first place?

Obama is going to get himself in a "who'll cut costs more" battle that he will NEVER win since Republicans are always willing and able to put Medicare and SS on the surgeon's table.

I advise President Obama to read or reread Al Gore's book the Assault on Reason and then listen to the speech Al Gore gave on the defense of the role of government on MLK Day a few years ago. I think that was a GREAT American speech and it needs to be read and reviewed as much as JFK's inaugural and MLK's I Have a Dream Speech.

The pivotal rhetorical battle to have with the Republicans is not small vs. large government but effective vs. ineffective government.

If we don't want to plundered and bankrupted by private enterprise, government has to step in and be the buffer. It is not wasteful bureaucracy to ensure that the citizens of the US are not poisoned by the food supply, or cheated of coverage by insurers, or able to spend a reasonable amount on utilities, or be able to attend higher education without signing up for lifelong economic serfdom.

Democrats have done a piss poor job of explaining that "re-distributing" wealth has to do with protecting and preserving the assets of the nation or to demonstrate how the wealth distribution for the past decade and before has been from the bottom upwards and not the top downwards.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. So true. The R's want to portray themselves as anti-government, but they are really
anti-citizen. You hit upon all of their weak spots.

BIG k/r!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC