Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why, Pray Tell Would You Freeze Government Spending In The Midst Of A Deep Recession*?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:40 PM
Original message
Why, Pray Tell Would You Freeze Government Spending In The Midst Of A Deep Recession*?
I know the economy is technically growing but it's not growing fast enough to bring down the unemployment rate.

Government spending has to take up some of the slack caused by decreased consumer demand. At least that's what I learned in Economics 101 some thirty years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wall Street is growing by turning the rest of us into Soylent Green
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe The Genius Who Unrecommended It Wants To Say Why It's A Good Thing.
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. You'd only do that if you knew absolutely nothing about economics.
You'd only do that if your top economic advisers were all GOP advisers.

You'd only do that if you had no understanding of the US deficits in the Depression and WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's What Roosevelt Did In 36 Which Prolonged The Great Depression
Oh well. At least I will have a lot of company in my "brokeness".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Krugman has warned that the recovery will flame out this year without more.
And I think he's right.

You don't stop putting wood in the fireplace just as the kindling begins to burn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. What If Textbooks Fifty Years From Now Show We Repeated Hoover's Mistakes
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Possible answers:
Because:
1) He hasn't a clue as to what else to do.
2) He is doggedly determined to win the approval of at least one Republican.
3) He is somehow still grossly mis-reading the situation at hand.
4) He is begging us to send him home.
5) He was seen in the WH drunkedly rambling to Herbert Hoover's portrait.

Either way, I feel sorry for the guy. Still waiting on a miracle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. +100
Or all of the above.


:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. or maybe China is making noises about
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 02:29 PM by Mojorabbit
calling in it's chips if we don't do something or maybe the big money guys are threatening to lower our credit rating if we don't do something.

edited because I left out two words in a sentence. Need more coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. We should wait to see what he intends to freeze. I must admit
I get ticked off when I hear some Sen. put in an earmark for a statue somewhere! I think it's possible that Obama intends to freeze things like that. And before you scream at me because building a statue would employ someone or even a few people the cost is way to high to squander on just one or a small handfull of people.

I'm going to wait until I hear the speech. If all the complainers are right, I'll be right there with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'd Love To Help Build A Statue In My Town If It Meant Getting Paid
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'd ;ove tp pay you to do a job too, but I think there are a lot of
other jobs that would help improve the econony & the infracture at the same time much better than a statue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Here's the list of potentials -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. EVeryone should take a look. The BIGGEST $$'s are out of Defense!
That's one of the gripes I keep hearing, one of the biggest expenditures we have is Defense, and they're exempt!" They're NOT! It sounds like what is exempt is paying for the wars, paying the soldiers we have there etc. but I saw $4.1 billion cut from Defense & I only looked at 1/2 the first page!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Then why announce it as a "freeze to everything BUT"?
Very curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I have no idea, but that's exactly why I said WAIT until you find out exactly
what is being terminated or frozen. There are at least 2 catagories ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Remember, these are potential cuts and reductions.
Line item stuff - what will actually get cut is an unknown (and did you notice that they sneaked in a $255 million increase for the Navy under the reductions column?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because the Republicans are complaining about the spending
that the Democrats have been doing, totally ignoring of course the incredible debt created by the irresponsible spending of the Republicans after they took power with a surplus created by the Democrats.

Of course our President trys to gain favor with the Republicans who didn't vote for him while trashing those of the Democratic left who did.

Anybody understand the logic of this, please feel free to step in....


Rec.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. because the government can afford to borrow?
rates are dropping... It's the only one to fuck up more borrowing at reasonable rates. Banks might get pissed at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. I remember well when every single Republican stood up and said raising taxes
in a recession would bankrupt America when Clinton presented his first Budget. Everyone of them and they all voted in lock-step said America would be completely destroyed..Just as they are saying now and yet America went on to experience the "Greatest Economic Expansion in History" I suspect all of the rhetoric from the left might be just as accurate as that from the right. I believe even the appearance of trying to control our spending can and will restore even more consumer confidence and thus improve the economy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because your corporate masters told you to. Money going anywhere else is money not going to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because you are feeling a need to pander n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alias Dictus Tyrant Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. There is a caveat
"Government spending has to take up some of the slack caused by decreased consumer demand. At least that's what I learned in Economics 101 some thirty years ago."


This economic theory is based on the idea of manipulating the perceptions of the population in ways that are contrary to reality to shift the equilibrium. Unfortunately, if the public refuses to drink the Kool-Aid then it is worse than doing nothing at all. This is the giant caveat of Keynesian economics; it is predicated on the public being ignorant and easily manipulated toward a certain course of action. If you have a highly skeptical public and/or a lack of de facto media message monopoly on the part of the government, government spending just makes the problem worse.

I think it is very difficult to argue that the public is so out-of-touch with reality and unskeptical in these days of pervasive mass media that the public will not see the sleight-of-hand for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Here is something
No one mentions that states cannot borrow:

"These new shortfalls are in addition to the gaps states closed when adopting their fiscal year 2010 budgets earlier this year. Counting both initial and mid-year shortfalls, 48 states have addressed or still face such shortfalls in their budgets for fiscal year 2010, totaling $193 billion or 28 percent of state budgets — the largest gaps on record."
So cut teachers and other state workers and the spirals continues down.

So that is why the feds cannot freeze spending in the middle of a depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbird Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. I hoping for farm subsidies.
But I'm kind of a dreamer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Sam Donaldson needs more money? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbird Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I meant cutting them.
Sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Michelle Bachman won't stand for that.
she loves her some welfare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. Because the MBA's are running the show.
and want to prove that government can and should run like a business. It can't, but they don't really care if they destroy government in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
30. The freeze / cuts won't happen until NEXT Year
Rachael Maddow touched on this, it's a tough dance transitioning from propping up a failing economy to keeping a groing economy from inducing rampant inflation. In the first case it's desireable to pump money into the economy and not worry about the defecit (of which Obama inherited a horrible one), but once the economy picks up the deficit becomes a huge problem.

Maybe President Obama didn't explain this part well enough, but none of the freezes / cuts will kick in until 2011. All of the stimulus money that's being put to work this year will still be out there providing jobs that will last 2, 3, or more years. At some point in the future the economy will start growing, at which time the government will need to go into deficit reduction mode, it seems that's what President Obama is planning for. After Rachael explained this it makes sense. The one thing that we have to remember (and keep pounding into the heads of our RW friends) is that President Obama inherited a horrible defecit that it will take some time to dig ourselves out of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC