Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Obama MUST Appease Wall St." - Even NPR Says So, Like No Explanation Needed???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:32 AM
Original message
"Obama MUST Appease Wall St." - Even NPR Says So, Like No Explanation Needed???
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 01:33 AM by snot
I heard this several times today. Ok, so a lot of us here on DU may assume he's owned; but is THAT what NPR's taking for granted?

It's not like the Wall St. population can outvote the rest of us. And the context didn't sound like they were referring to a worry that if Obama does the wrong thing, the stock market will crash.

Like, what's NPR's understanding of why Obama MUST appease Wall St.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. NPR is a joke
They are trying to appeal to a group of people who don't and will never listen to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep.
And Wall Street doesn't have to outvote us, they can outspend us and we wind up voting for one of their two candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. ...but who now pay the bills....
"Don't worry, corporate advertising wont change NPR..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's "common sense"
according to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. He threatned to break the banks the other day
that won't happen, but they need to be appeased now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. So he's been ratcheting up the pressure - why??
"Then, late in December, the President met with community bankers who largely support the financial regulatory package and are important to the recovery as they make up 50% of loans to small business. These small banks are also under pressure from the larger American Bankers Association for not fighting the House regulation bill.

As tensions mounted and the banking industry continued to ignore the Administration’s requests to limit excessive bonuses and spending, the President announced a bank fee would be imposed to guarantee the collection of “every single dime the American people are owed.” Word of the fee leaked out as early as Jan 12, three weeks after the President’s meeting with community bankers.

Less than a week after the Jan 14 banking fee announcement, the President pressed on and announced his intention to implement what has come to be known as “the Volcker Rule”, separating the service and investing side of Wall Street firms. A White House official said both Tim Geithner and Lawrence Summers worked closely with Paul Volcker and that “The plan was submitted to the president with a unanimous recommendation from the economic team.” While Geithner expresses concerns about its necessity and effectiveness, one can’t help but wonder if this is not an expression of the President’s exasperation with these banks and a not so subtle reminder that there is much more the President can do if the banks continue to choose risky ventures and excess over responsibility."

http://obama-mamas.com/blog/?p=1078


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Corporatism--the Merger of Government and Business.
Wall Street are the most important players in business. If a President
does not please them, they begin to fluctuate. Media starts harpting
on the President. Investors big and small do not like fluctuating
Markets. How often do we hear--How does Wall Street like this.

Since Wall Street is in the business of making money and have been
given the power, they want policy which advantages them. Because
of their power they pretty much get what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phlem Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good Eye Broahh!!!
Nice flag on NPR, Last I heard the person running PBS was a shrub plant, no pun intended, hope they're mitt's aren't on NPR too.

-phlem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, most of the public is either Clueless or in terminal denial, so why not just say it out in
the open?

Why not just tell us how things work?

Why not be blatant?

It's not like we're going to rebel or do anything about it.

What with the new American Idol to consider, all those rumors that Simon is leaving, and having only a precious two weeks to "Get Ready For Some Football".

We have to focus on the important things.

That other stuff's just too hard.

And all this talk about Obama getting tough on banks?

For right now, it's just talk.

And from what we have seen so far, that is likely all it will ever amount to.

I WANT to be wrong about that. And so does every single person on this board who has been critical of him, despite what the Rose-Colored Gatekeepers think.

We WANT him to succeed. We DO NOT want to be turned back over to Republican Rule. This country CANNOT and WILL NOT survive that.

WE WANT what we VOTED for. WE WANT to be REPRESENTED.

Whether we get it or not?

Well, that is up to actions, not words.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter1x9 Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. Plutocracy
NOUN:
pl. plu·toc·ra·cies

1. Government by the wealthy.
2. A wealthy class that controls a government.
3. A government or state in which the wealthy rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. NPR used to be a quality
source of news and information, no longer.

I am often so disgusted by their right wing spin that I have to turn it off.

When Juan Williams is the token "liberal" in a group of four conservatives how is that different than Faux Noise, other than being less shrill?

Listen folks, this country is in deep trouble and it starts with how the flow of information is controlled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. the P in NPR no longer stands for PUBLIC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Did you not notice...
... the market went straight down when it was announced that Bernanke was not a shoo in?

And that as soon as he was announced as a shoo in, the markets recovered?

Wall Street IS running the show. The markets are not trading like they are supposed to, with people buying stocks based on a company's earnings outlook, stocks are being gamed by the big IBs who now make of the majority of all trading volume.

The CAN crash the market and they WILL crash the market if they don't get what they want. The only way to counter this is to tell them "go ahead" and then they will have little leverage, but Obama doesn't seem like a tough man to me.

As for Obama's newfound desire to reinstate Glass-Stegal type reforms, well he's had a year and he hasn't done JACK SHIT. I will believe it the day it is signed into law and not before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. So you think NPR is implicitly acknowledging that Wall St. is successfully
extorting compliance from Obama by virtue of an implicit threat to deliberately crash the market if he does something they don't like -- not bec. it's bad for the economy, but bec. it might cut into their bonuses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Because NPR has the same responsibility and expects Obama to share it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC