Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's official: CalPERS loses $500 million on New York apartment deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:04 AM
Original message
It's official: CalPERS loses $500 million on New York apartment deal
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/01/money-cocalpers-loses-500-million-on-new-york-apartment-deal.html
January 25, 2010 | 10:37 am
The California Public Employees' Retirement System officially has lost a $500-million stake in the biggest deal ever in the U.S. for a single piece of residential property.

The owners of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, a complex of 56 buildings with 11,000 rental units near the East River in Manahattan, have agreed to turn the property over to creditors after defaulting on $4.4 billion in debt.

CalPERS had committed 26.5% of the partnership led by Tishman Speyer Properties and Black Rock Inc., one of the fund's real estate investment advisors. "This was one of our investments when the real estate market was peaking during 2005 and 2006," said Clark McKinley, a CalPERS spokesman. "Performance was negatively affected by the aftershock of the market collapse."

CalPERS wrote its Stuyvesant stake down to zero in March, said Chief Investment Officer Joseph Dear. "There were negotiations about how it terminates, but we didn't expect to receive any value on that."

The loss in the New York City apartment market was the most spectacular blowup in what had been a horrendous 2009 for the $200-billion CalPERS. The fund's real estate portfolio dropped by 47.5%, spurring CalPERS to terminate its relationships with some real estate advisors and to write down many of its holdings to market values.

<SNIP>
Apparently there weren't equivalently attractive real estate deals in California?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps they realized what was happening in California
which is why the slightly more stable northeast corridor looked more attractive.

Ooops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's kind of ironic that CA employees retirements depended on busting New York City rent controls
The deal would be profitable for CALPERS and other investors only if Tishman-Speyer and Blackrock Realty could succeed in converting the rent-controlled apartments of this large, middle-class enclave into market-rate, up-scale apartments for the Wall Street bankers and other lower Manhattan fat cats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obviously, $500M is a lot of money.
...but the loss on this deal only represented 1/4 of one percent of their total holdings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. CalPERS is he-uge, they're practically ginormous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Apparently.
I had no idea it was THAT big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They dropped from $250 B to around 165, and are back up to 200
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. eek
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Reminds me a little of a story line in The Sopranos.
I wonder if corruption is a factor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC