Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Used Car Dealer Sues Customer for Paying Stated Price

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:03 PM
Original message
Used Car Dealer Sues Customer for Paying Stated Price
Used Car Dealer Sues Customer for Paying Stated Price


Sometimes a deal is not only too good to be true, but it also will get you sued. In 2007, Tammie Townsend of Hopkins, Minnesota, leased a Chrysler Pacifica, before later asking the dealership, Walser Chrysler, if she could buy it. A salesman told her she could have the car for $11,639, or about $6,000 below Blue Book value. On her way out of the dealership, the salesman told Townsend, “You’re getting a great deal.”

Too great, it turned out. The dealership came back to Townsend saying that due to a clerical error on their part, she couldn’t have the car for the agreed price, and either had to pay more money or return the vehicle. Townsend refused, dodging two repo men before locking the car in a friend’s garage. Walser Chrysler is now suing Townsend to reclaim the Pacifica.

http://www.allgov.com/ViewNews/Used_Car_Dealer_Sues_Customer_for_Paying_Stated_Price_100121
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fun! Good times with contracts
I'd be interested to know what Minnesota law is regarding oral contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I don't think it was just an oral contract.
The article states that papers were signed. In that case, I don't see how the dealership can win this.

Anyway, it's a stupid move on the part of the dealer. They will probably lose more money from the bad publicity than they lost on the sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. i'd buy me a few dozen eggs
and unleash them on some HOT AUGUST night on every car in their lot...

pricks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. As long as all of the contracts have been signed, the dealership is screwed
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I used to be a manager of a Ford dealership
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 04:19 PM by Cronus Protagonist
The rubber has to meet the road for the contracts to be valid. That's why we always have the vehicle gassed up and ready to go right after the contract is signed. Once the rubber of the tires meet the asphalt on the road, the car is theirs. Until then, it's just a pile of paper.

Of course, there can still be unwinds if the check doesn't clear or the customer invokes the 72 hour rule and things like tat, but for most purposes, once they're in the car with the contract signed, it's theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5.  The dealership would have held the customer to any contract she signed. Sore losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC