Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From bad to much worse: Highly radioactive water found at Vermont nuke plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 07:09 AM
Original message
From bad to much worse: Highly radioactive water found at Vermont nuke plant

A day after contaminated water was found in a test well at the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant, company officials announced finding wastewater containing high levels of radioactivity, news outlets are reporting.

The water, reportedly about 100 gallons, was contaminated with radioactive tritium at a concentration of about 2 million picocuries per liter, a spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission told the Brattleboro Reformer. That's about 100 times the allowable federal level for drinking water and 70 times the standard for groundwater.

The Reformer describes the contamination as "free- standing water in a room in the radioactive waste building," while the the Argus Times quotes the head of the state senate as saying that the water was "discovered in a trench" at the plant and that plant officials "said the trench filled back up with suspected radioactive water after it was pumped out and processed."

No public comment yet from the owner, Entergy Nuclear.

The 38-year-old plant has suffered other malfunctions, and some New Englanders want it shut.

The news comes a day after company announced that tritium has contaminated a second groundwater monitoring well and that " tritium levels in the first contaminated well had risen again and were now above federal safe drinking water standards," the Rutland Herald reports.

The first well is about 30 feet from the Connecticut River and registers 22,300 picocuries per liter, while the second well is roughly 100 feet from the river and registers 9,600 picocuries. The tritium level "has risen steadily in the past 10 days, since Entergy first announced the contamination," the paper writes, noting that the wells are " relatively shallow, about 30 feet deep, the better to track groundwater."

<snip>

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/01/highly-radioactive-water-found-at-vermont-nuke-plant/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. The nuclear power industry has been doing the same type bull for years
I've been aware of their obfuscations, distortions and out right lies for 40 some odd years now.
If nuke energy was what the industry lies and tells us it is I'd be all for it but when its one lie after another lie, screw that.

Just think all the nuke plants are getting up there in the years so we'll be seeing more and more of these kinds of discoveries. They lie and then they lie to you again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. You should put this in the Energy/Environmental forum....
just to watch the pro-nuke nuts try and justify this.

I know, it's like shooting fish in a barrel, but it's still fun. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well then, I'd say its a mighty good thing that Tritium's half life is only 12 years
Because that means that unless there are drinking water wells within about 120 feet of the contaminated soil it will be essentially undetectable to the public.

You see that's how it works. After 10 half lifes no radioactive substance poses a threat to man, even the most dreaded of them all - plutinium. Now if the half life is 25,000 years then the point is moot for us, but if you are talking about 12 years, that is a different thing. It means that 120 years from now the stuff, or our purposes, essentially disappears. Ground water, I was told back in college, moves through the soil at an average rate of about 1 foot per year. I know that was a gross estimate, but good enough for our purposes.

What it tells you is that if its tritium (isotope of hydrogen) then 120 years after its creation it is gone and in 120 years it would naturally migrate about 120 feet. So this may not be the end of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC