Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Subpoenas for Rice, Card and the RNC!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:04 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Subpoenas for Rice, Card and the RNC!
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 12:06 PM by blogslut
Just cause I can't find a story on it yet via the MSM.

Maybe I was dreaming?

EDIT: MSM in general. Not just MSN. Still looking for a headline or mention. So far, CNN is clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Bring it on." - Commander AWOL & Corrupt republicon Cronies
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 12:07 PM by SpiralHawk
"The patriotic citizens of the US deserve to have a chance at the
truth, and also a chance to bring me and my corrupt republicon cronies to justice.
So I say, bring the subpeonas on..."

- Commander AWOL (hero, republicon Chickenhawk Brigade)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Crackers
Isn't that a portrait of Crackers from 'Pink Flamingos?' Miss Cotton: 'What's with you and them fuckin' chickens, anyway?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Check the CSPAN thread
You aren't dreaming. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. heehee
I was there. I'm not dreaming. But so far, no mention on the broadcast CNN or in any Google search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. So what happens when they ignore them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good question
Odds are good they will fight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Then they'd be charged with contempt of congress.
I certainly wouldn't mind seeing them issue warrants for their arrest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. You really think that would happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. has rove gotten one yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. playtime is over for the neo cons!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Should we call the Media and surprise them with the news?

There is no way they can tell us they didn't know by now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. They will find a way
Probably some crap about how these subpoenas aren't newsworthy. Oh but McCain making a non announcement about running for prez is totally newsworthy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. ah hahahahaha. . .(good one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Bet they are locked in a closet and trying to find a way to spin it!



Do we have a "smilie" for a Spinning Top?

If not, we sure need one.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. the media should be next to feel the heat
you know I didn't know until I came yesterday the Dennis brought forward the articles of impeachment towards cheney, the media did not even give a report of it. Damn this media they should be brought down with Bushie too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. LOL

eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's true... and MSM doesn't like it. . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Checking in late...
why, specifically, is Rice being subpoenaed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. to explain those 16, nagging words
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Excellent.
I've been enjoying watching them scramble over the USA scandal, but there's bigger fish to fry. If I can scramble my metaphors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. May I? ......
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Don't cha know that an unflattering sound bite of Rosie or Alec Baldwin trumps all?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Call CNN!
404.827.1500

Press one for the newstip hotline. Let them know that supoenas were issued!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Let's Call now!
Nothing as of this minute on their homepage 1:11 EST

www.cnn.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I already called
The nice young man said he had no control over news content. I told him to please relay this story to those that do have control. I told him that subpoena's for Rice and the RNC trump John McCain making an announcement that he already made on the Daily Show last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. They had to wait until they got their marching orders from Rove

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Raw Story comes through
dare I say...first?

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Waxman_on_Rice_We_have_hit_0425.html

"...All three subpoenas were agreed to by the Committee. Waxman attempted to show that his willingness to have a hearing with votes was a new direction for the Oversight Committee.

"Under the rules of this Committee, the Chairman has the power to issue subpoenas without debate or votes in the Committee. That is what Dan Burton used to do. In fact, that is what he did over 1,000 times," he said. "But I am taking a different approach today. I believe the entire Committee should have a chance to participate in the subpoenas we will consider today."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thanks!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Karl Rove was also indicted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. cute
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. It's TRUE!!!! I just can't find a link for it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. back off
Read the links provided and weep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. From making shit up? Not. The Rice subpoena is *approved* not *issued*...
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 12:46 PM by BlooInBloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I never said issued
But the AP sure did. Go fling your accusations elsewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. lol! And what about the Card and RNC hallucinations of yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Maybe if you had watched the hearing
instead of thinking up baseless crap, you'd know I am right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. for your edification
From the AP story now also @ Forbes:

"The House oversight committee also issued subpoenas for the Republican National Committee for testimony and documents about White House e-mails on RNC accounts that have apparently gone missing..."

And as an apology, you are correct, no subpoena for Card...yet:

"Even as he pressed ahead on Rice, Waxman postponed a vote on issuing a subpoena to former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card on the same issue, saying White House Counsel Fred Fielding had made a compromise proposal worth pursuing. Under it, the committee would first talk to the White House office of administration about Card's knowledge of the uranium claim..."

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/04/25/ap3651513.html

I stand corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. Houston Chronicle!
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 12:43 PM by blogslut
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/politics/4747792.html

Panel votes to subpoena Condoleezza Rice

By LAURIE KELLMAN Associated Press Writer
© 2007 The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — In rapid succession, congressional committees Wednesday ramped up their investigations of the Bush administration by approving a subpoena for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and granting immunity to a key aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

By 21-10, the House oversight committee voted to issue a subpoena to Rice to compel her story on the Bush administration's claim, now discredited, that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa...


Okay. The AP has written about it. Is it officially news now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
29.  Link Here:
April 25, 2007, 12:24PM
House panel approves subpoena for Rice

By LAURIE KELLMAN Associated Press Writer
© 2007 The Associated Press


WASHINGTON — In rapid succession, congressional committees Wednesday ramped up their investigations of the Bush administration by approving a subpoena for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and granting immunity to a key aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

By 21-10, the House oversight committee voted to issue a subpoena to Rice to compel her story on the Bush administration's claim, now discredited, that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa.

Moments earlier in the committee chamber next door, the House Judiciary Committee voted 32-6 to grant immunity to Monica Goodling, Gonzales' White House liaison, for her testimony on why the administration fired eight federal prosecutors. The panel also unanimously approved — but did not issue — a subpoena to compel her to appear.

Simultaneously across Capitol Hill, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved — but did not issue — a subpoena on the prosecutors' matter to Sara Taylor, deputy to presidential adviser Karl Rove.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/politics/4747821.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. yep
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
36. LBN Thread and yahoo link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Thanks!!!
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 01:27 PM by wicket
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
39. Washington Post has it now
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042501639.html

House panel votes to subpoena Rice on Iraq

Reuters
Wednesday, April 25, 2007; 1:34 PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic lawmakers voted on Wednesday to subpoena Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to testify about administration justifications for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

On a party-line vote of 21-10, the House of Representatives' Oversight and Government Reform Committee directed Rice to appear before the panel next month...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC