Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

check out this post on a message board... the light bulb is going on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:43 PM
Original message
check out this post on a message board... the light bulb is going on
President Bush and the first lady paid $186,378 in federal taxes on their income of $765,801 for 2006, that is .24337654%

I earned $144,048 and paid $50,874 in federal income tax, that's was .35317394%.

I paid about 11% more in taxes and he earned $621,753 more than I. The rich did get a bigger tax cut. I'm proof.

Posted by: Screwed Again

4/23/2007 8:37 PM

------------------------------------------------------
Add me to that "Screwed Again" list, I paid more than he did also and I worked for my money!!!!!!


Posted by: Screwed Again 2

4/24/2007 2:17 PM
3814.106 Report as Violation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Turn the light fully on.....
go watch www.freedomtofascism.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ha! "I worked for my money."
i.e., the poster doesn't think Bush works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. No kidding. It would be the first I've heard of it.
How hard is it to drag his butt out for those photo ops, anyway?



You'd think he'd have the sense to be embarrassed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. the decimal points . . .
. . . are in the wrong places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shoddy math skills are showing. That SHOULD be
24.337654% and 35.317394%, respectively.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. And for that he makes over $140k...
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 05:29 PM by Juniperx
I'm in the wrong business. We have much higher standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is the salary as president taxable? I am not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes it is, just as military salaries are taxed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wages are taxed more than investment income now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedleyMisty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. "the rich"?
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 05:33 PM by sleebarker
Dude, you make well over six figures a year. You are rich.

What type of board was this? A Republican one? Goes to show how out of touch they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't think he made that much -- whoever posted that message did. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. This was reported as a violation -- we must not talk about it
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 05:50 PM by djohnson
We can't make our masters angry at us by noticing they pay less tax on the money they steal from us, than we pay for the money we earn.

Edited to add: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Classic GOP tunnel vision
I suspect this twit would be just fine with the entire list of felonies perpetrated by the BushCo crime syndicate. But hit him in the wallet and, bam, the miserable, self-absorbed, greedy little turd is up in arms.

I hope his creditors hound him into an early grave, but not before driving him insane with final notices, credit card cancellations, utility shut-offs, and at least ten calls a night from hostile collection agencies.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. While I appreciate the point he was trying to make, I don't think there's any way he paid 35.3%
Even if he's single, his *marginal* tax rate (how many Murkans even know what that means?) would have been only 28% on a TAXABLE income of 144K. If he made 144K, the taxable income would be quite a bit less - subtracting out the personal exemption, deductions (itemized or standard) and any tax credits.


http://taxes.about.com/od/2006taxes/qt/2006_tax_rates.htm from the article:
Tax rates apply only to taxable income. Non-taxable income encompasses tax-free interest on municipal bonds, above-the-line adjustments, itemized deductions or the standard deduction, and personal exemptions. Taxable income is almost always less than your total income.
<snip>
Single Filing Status
(Tax Rate Schedule X)
10% on income between $0 and $7,550

15% on the income between $7,550 and $30,650; plus $755.00

25% on the income between $30,650 and $74,200; plus $4,220.00

28% on the income between $74,200 and $154,800; plus $15,107.50

33% on the income between $154,800 and $336,550; plus $37,675.50

35% on the income over $336,550; plus $97,653.00

Married Filing Jointly or Qualifying Widow(er) Filing Status
(Tax Rate Schedule Y-1)
10% on the income between $0 and $15,100

15% on the income between $15,100 and $61,300; plus $1,510.00

25% on the income between $61,300 and $123,700; plus $8,440.00

28% on the income between $123,700 and $188,450; plus $24,040.00

33% on the income between $188,450 and $336,550; plus $42,170.00

35% on the income over $336,550; plus $91,043.00

Married Filing Separately Filing Status
(Tax Rate Schedule Y-2)
10% on the income between $0 and $7,550

15% on the income between $7,550 and $30,650; plus $755.00

25% on the income between $30,650 and $61,850; plus $4,220.00

28% on the income between $61,850 and $94,225; plus $12,020.00

33% on the income between $94,225 and $168,275; plus $21,085.00

35% on the income over $168,275; plus $45,521.50

Head of Household Filing Status
(Tax Rate Schedule Z)
10% on the income between $0 and $10,750

15% on the income between $10,750 and $41,050; plus $1,075.00

25% on the income between $41,050 and $106,000; plus $5,620.00

28% on the income between $106,000 and $171,650; plus $21,857.50

33% on the income between $171,650 and $336,550; plus $40,239.50

35% on the income over $336,550; plus $94,656.50

Tax Calculation Example
Mary is a single taxpayer with $350,000 of taxable income. Her income is taxed in each of the tax brackets, as follows:
$755.00 (tax on the first $7,550 of Mary's income, taxed at the 10% rate), plus
$3,465.00 (tax on the income between $7,550 and $30,650, taxed at the 15% rate), plus
$10,887.50 (tax on the income between $30,650 and $74,200, taxed at the 25% rate), plus
$22,568.00 (tax on the income between $74,200 and $154,800, taxed at the 28% rate), plus
$59,977.50 (tax on the income between $154,800 and $336,550, taxed at the 33% rate), plus
$4,707.50 (tax on the income over $336,550, taxed at the 35% rate), for a grand total tax of
$102,360.50.




From the example, a SINGLE person with a TAXABLE income of $154,800 would pay $22,568 in income tax - 14.6% of the TAXABLE income.

And even if he was subject to the AMT, those rates are 26 or 28%, from what I can tell.
Bottom line - no way did he pay 35.3% of his gross (or even his taxable) income in income tax.


I DO wholeheartedly agree that the wealthy pay far too small a percentage of their income in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC