Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi on Iraq Supplemental: 'For the First Time, Bush Will Have to Be Accountable'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:43 PM
Original message
Pelosi on Iraq Supplemental: 'For the First Time, Bush Will Have to Be Accountable'
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 03:44 PM by bigtree
WASHINGTON, April 24 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi and other House leaders held a news conference in the Capitol this
afternoon on the House-Senate Appropriations Committee conference report on
the Iraq supplemental bill. Below are her opening remarks:

"It was with great pride that we presented to our Caucus today the
conference report that was reported out of the Appropriations Committee
last night. Chairman Obey has received a great response from our colleagues
because they appreciate what he did.

"Our bill is grounded in the realities in the war in Iraq, recognizes
the strain that this war is placing on our military, recognizes the urgency
to hold the Iraqi government accountable, and honors our commitment to our
veterans, instead of the failure to meet those commitments that exists now.

"The response that the president gave this morning when he heard of the
bill was the response of a president whose administration is in disarray.

"For the first time, the president will have to be accountable for this
war in Iraq. And he does not want to face that reality.

"Since the beginning of this war, which has lasted longer than World
War II, the president has repeatedly not accounted for its continuing costs
in his regular budget request. That is why Congress has had to pass seven
supplementals.

"What is it that the Commander-in-Chief doesn't know, that doesn't
equip him to make a regular budget request for the war? Seven
supplementals, seven times unprepared? I don't think so. I think it's seven
times that the president wanted to hide the truth of the cost of this war
from the American people.

"The bill we intend to send to the president fully supports our troops
and veterans. In fact, we give those troops and veterans more than the
president asks for.

"When the president says he's going to veto this bill, he's going to
veto increased spending on military health. He's going to veto BRAC
spending, which is over and above his request. He's going to veto meeting
the health care needs, especially mental health needs, of our veterans who
are returning from the war.

"This bill is consistent with the recommendations of the Iraq Study
Group. It has the support of many retired military generals and reflects
the wishes of the American people to wind down this war.

"The president has to face the reality on the ground in Iraq. And he
has to face the reality of accountability in this Congress."


http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=ind_focus.story&STORY=/www/story/04-24-2007/0004572842&EDATE=TUE+Apr+24+2007,+03:48+PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. #1


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Accountable? Will we recognize him? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. he'll be the one in the defendant's chair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "The time for accountability has passed - it was called the 2004 "election" GWB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Reid --> Pelosi --> Reid --> Pelosi --> Reid --> Pelosi ..... etc ......
I love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just empty words from the fluff chick.
Actions speak louder than words.

When are you going to act, Madame Squeaker? Your actions are critical to saving America. America is dying, hanging by a thread.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I like that ... "Madame Squeaker"
Nail on head.

No wonder she keeps running around in rove's DemocRat's Maze.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Where's your coalition in Congress and why couldn't they manage enough votes for whatever you wanted
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 05:14 PM by bigtree
How will they manage to 'act' without the necessary support to effect whatever you support, given the balance of power? The Speaker just has one vote like everyone else. Where is your coalition in Congress and why didn't they manage to convince the majority of Democrats to support their strategy?

It's pathetic, really, to blame the Speaker for the failure of some coalition or another to rally enough votes behind their proposal for legislation or action. Almost everyone except the most strident critics on our party's left sees the Democratic legislation as a historic rebuke of the Executive at 'war'. While some (Democratic?) critics are satisfied to still be bleating about a fight they lost months ago in the House, others are busy confronting the real obstacle to ending the occupation at his desk. Feel free to give a hand to that effort whenever you're done with the self-flagellation act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hastert kept his flock in line didn't he? Why can't the squeaker?
She wanted the gavel and professed she had the stuff to weld it. She didn't fool me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. unlike the republicans, our party members think for themselves
she's not a dictator. she managed to reconcile all of the different ideas and proposals into legislation which would advance to Bush's desk. That's her job and she did it well. She's not finished, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. The people hold him accountable, Congress holds him accountable,
the Military holds him accountable, the World holds him accountable....but as to king George himself?

He is a psychopath who has surrounded himself with psychopaths. He does not CARE about accountability because it does not apply to him.. he has NEVER been held accountable for anything in his life..

“You can't "negotiate" or bargain with psychopaths.” -Dr. William Higgins.

Madame Speaker, please take note. This "leader of the free world" does not and will not respond to anything remotely resembling accountability. He is not a person with a conscience like you or me, or like most any human being.

“Callous, deceitful, reckless, guiltless . . . The psychopath understands the wishes and concerns of others; he simply does not care . . . The psychopath believes that rules and morals are for other, weaker people who obey because they fear punishment . . . he may have an ingratiating manner and superficial charm, be persuasive, poised . . . he is adept at lying, evasiveness, feigned forgetfulness with vague and inconsistent answers about his past . . .” - Dr. David B. Adams

Bush would not be able to ignore impeachment..he would not be able to stay in denial about it.. because it would proceed with or without his acknowledgment.

INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT IMPRECATE INCARCERATE :banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nancy, Ya doing a Great Job...don't get downhearted by comments denigrating your efforts
Go slow and do it right.....the Future depends on you and the DEM Party....The GOP have failed us...miserably FAILED I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC