Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TIME reporter describes complex attack that resulted in 10 US soldiers killed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:27 PM
Original message
TIME reporter describes complex attack that resulted in 10 US soldiers killed

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1614091,00.html?cnn=yes

<snip>

Word of yesterday's deadly assault in eastern Diyala Province spread quickly among U.S. troops as far away as the western city of Tikrit, where soldiers with the 82nd Airborne kept a close watch on reports of their comrades sent to the Baqubah area to deal with rising violence there. The strike was what U.S. soldiers call a complex attack, one involving elaborate planning to maximize casualties. Initial assessments suggest that first a suicide car bomber rammed a vehicle into the gates of a small U.S. patrol base outside Baquba in the same area where single car bomber attacked a patrol base last month. A second suicide car bomber apparently followed the first in yesterday's attack, however. And at the same time insurgents fired small arms and rocket propelled grenades, according to soldiers from the 82nd Airborne. In the end, the patrol base was all or mostly destroyed, with several soldiers dead beneath the rubble.

At least one other U.S. patrol base remains in the same area of the Diyala River valley as American troops struggle against insurgents who appear to be increasingly bent on turning the territory around Baquba into the most deadly front of the war in Iraq for U.S. forces. It remains to be seen whether the dozens of other combat outposts popping up around Iraq amid the surge will come to face similar attacks aimed at sending U.S. troops back into heavily fortified compounds and, in the hopes of insurgents, ultimately home to the United States in defeat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. is this a result of the surge?
US surged Baghdad pushing violence into region outside of Baghdad which was unprepared for the heightened risk in their region...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The "Petraeus Plan" aka "Surge" - results in the troops being sitting ducks :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. yes, troops in smaller unprotected bases scattered about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Reid has it right, we have lost the war
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 01:47 PM by lyonn
No matter what areas we try to protect we cannot do it all. (Where is that damn coalition that bush gathered together?) Some intelligent planning 3 years ago would have helped our cause in this invasion. For 3 years bush has ignored what ME experts told him. Rummy was too senile to understand the facts.

Edit: Again those against us being there appear to be getting their way. They know george has no New war plan. How hard is it to fight an enemy when you know their war plan? George keeps doing the same thing over and over......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Insurgents increasingly bent on...what?
"insurgents who appear to be increasingly bent on turning the territory around Baquba into the most deadly front of the war in Iraq for U.S. forces."

Or increasingly bent on kicking our ass out of their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Apparently the US military guys expect them to use stones
and spears. The US military is getting it's ass kicked on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. "In the end, the patrol base was all or mostly destroyed" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Telling isn't it.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nothing about dead iraqis either.
And this is the result of Petraeus "plan".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. As one DUer said a couple of days ago, "this is a siege not surge"
Apparently a siege of Baghdad only. Ugh, Hell, that is a disaster already and no one seems to notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't miss the propaganda line inside the story:
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 01:50 PM by MethuenProgressive
It remains to be seen whether the dozens of other combat outposts popping up around Iraq amid the surge will come to face similar attacks aimed at sending U.S. troops back into heavily fortified compounds and, in the hopes of insurgents, ultimately home to the United States in defeat.

That's a lie. They don't want us to go home. They want us there, so they can kill us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You can bet your booties there will be similar attacks.
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 02:01 PM by bemildred
The tactics are not new, it's been tried before. What's new is the "leaders" stuck the troops out in the middle of hostile country in outposts small enough that these tactics worked with the sort of forces that the insurgents can bring to bear.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Didn't the French try something like this in North Africa, with their
Foreign Legion strung out across the desert in small isolated posts? And that turned out well, didn't it? Jesus! Didn't Betrayus and his bone-headed cadres every watch old movies on Saturday morning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Idiot "leaders" getting troops killed through arrogance and stupidity has a long history.
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 02:34 PM by bemildred
Certainly you mention one instance. The Spanish debacle at Anual(1921) is another example, and the British surrender at Kut(1916), but there are many. Too many. What annoys me the most is that you have bonehead chickenhawks like Cheney, who have meddled from day one, saying "politicians should not second guess the soldiers", and you know this stupid "plan" of Petraeus is driven by nothing but political considerations, as was the war itself, and the occupation, and all that has followed. Cheney doesn't care a crap about the soldiers, he's scared because his power is threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I dispute the idea that they don't want us to withdraw.
They have no inherent interest in killing Americans. They do have an inherent interest in fighting the forces that invaded them. Once we withdraw, they will no doubt go on fighting each other until everyone gets tired of the bloodshed and begins trying to negotiate some kind of settlement. Our participation does nothing but delat that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. This certainly doesn't sound like an insurgency in it's "last throes."
Think Progress

This attack sounds like it was carefully planned:

The strike was what U.S. soldiers call a complex attack, one involving elaborate planning to maximize casualties. Initial assessments suggest that first a suicide car bomber rammed a vehicle into the gates of a small U.S. patrol base outside Baquba in the same area where single car bomber attacked a patrol base last month. A second suicide car bomber apparently followed the first in yesterday's attack, however. And at the same time insurgents fired small arms and rocket propelled grenades, according to soldiers from the 82nd Airborne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. I had serious doubts yesterday when the attack was reported as 1 suicide bomber
I fear will be seeing more of this type of complex military attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. We're not winning in Baghdad, we're not winning outside of Baghdad--
Can somebody tell me why Petraeus is a genius military strategist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Because he stabilized Mosul for a time...
Oh, check this shit out: I think I figured out the REAL reason Petraeus is fucked up. I was flippin' through the Wikipedia entry on Petraeus, and turned up this little tidbit: When Petraeus was commander of 3/187 Infantry at Fort Campbell, he got accidentally shot by one of his troops during a live-fire exercise. (The guy tripped. His rifle went off and hit Petraeus in the chest. No big deal.) They flew Petraeus to Nashville, where he was operated on by...

don't laugh too hard...

Catkiller Frist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. God, that is too weird!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbyrob79 Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. Isn't this war mostly
about keeping the price of oil high to ensure big profits for Exxonmobile and BP Amoco? The longer it goes on and the more instability it breeds in the region, the higher the price of oil will go, and the bigger profits these companies will have. Its kind of the writing on the wall isn't it? Cheney doesn't want to end the war, he wants to use it to help concentrate the wealth in this country even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC