Yesterday's Gone...has Senator Clinton gotten the message yet?

[Clarkie1]

The Democratic Party would do well not to look back...if you get my drift.

[aquart]

1. Pathetic.

[Clarkie1]

3. Think Obama should make it his campaign song? nt

[draft_mario_cuomo]

6. It would be perfect for him

[iamjoy]

2. So No Clark Either?

Not looking back means no Clinton, Edwards or Gore. It means no Kucinich, no Sharpton and no Clark. With the exception of H. Clinton, they've all run for President before, and she has already been in the White House. Biden, Dodd - they've been around FOR-Ever! Richardson, bah, such a long resume, he was in the Clinton admministration too.

Don't look back. So, I guess it's got to be, er Obama?

[Clarkie1]

7. Right now, it means Obama.

I like Gore tremendously, but I think he would not be a poor choice for just that reason...looking back. We don't need to relive the 2000 election.

As for Edwards, not so much looking back (although he's close to my last choice). Clark has never held political office, so that would hardly be looking back (should he decide to run).

Kucinich and Sharpton are insignificant in a Presidential election sense....so really not relevant to the point I'm making.

[durrrty libby]

4. Senator Clinton will be a fabulous president. I can not wait!

[draft_mario_cuomo]

5. Good one

[MethuenProgressive]

8. "not look back"? How many years ago was it that Clark ran, again?

Hint: Post more positive messages about the candidate you back than you do about those you oppose.

[mitchtv]

9. Fred Thompson, you know, the old guy with cancer

is gonna win it all 50 states. I have it from an excellent "authority".

[illinoisprogressive]

10. We just need to close the era out completely. Move on to a new one.

[frogcycle]

11. what an inane thread n/t