Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge dismisses all charges in Blackwater shooting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:32 PM
Original message
Judge dismisses all charges in Blackwater shooting
WASHINGTON — A federal judge dismissed all charges Thursday against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards accused of killing unarmed Iraqi civilians on a crowded Baghdad street in 2007.

U.S. District Judge Ricardo Urbina said Justice Department prosecutors improperly built their case on sworn statements that had been given under a promise of immunity. Urbina said the government's explanations were "contradictory, unbelievable and lacking in credibility."

The decision throws out a case steeped in international politics. The September 2007 shooting in busy Nisoor Square left 17 Iraqis dead and inflamed anti-American sentiment abroad. The Iraqi government wanted the guards to face trial in Iraq and officials there said they would closely watch how the U.S. judicial system handled the case.

"We're obviously disappointed by the decision," Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said in an e-mail. "We're still in the process of reviewing the opinion and considering our options."

Blackwater contractors had been hired to guard U.S. diplomats in Iraq. The shooting led to the unraveling of the N North Carolina-based company, which has since changed its management and changed its name to Xe Services.


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/top/all/6794001.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. They don't hate us for our freedom.
This is what they hate us for. This makes me absolutely sick. Blackwater goes over there and kills anybody they want to, and they get off scott free. Well, speaking of freedom ..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. They promised immunity and then decided to prosecute?
Am I reading that correctly? Is this another way the bushies decided to try to undermine the judicial system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Funny thing - Immunity Claus never made main stream media
geez who would da thunk it - By executive order you can grant immunity from crimes not yet committed to include MURDER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So federal prosecutors have the authority to pass executive orders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. What are you talking about?
The immunity was granted after the killings, not before.

The government screwed up in using the statements in building their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Nope - search DU archives - Bush's Executive order 17xx
before they ever went into Iraq. It granted all contractors complete immunity from Iraqi and American law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Please read the article in the OP
It specifically talks about what immunity was violated, and it was the immunity promised during the investigation, which was after the shootings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Yep - thats right State Dept. & FBI gave them immunity
what a mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. EDIT: I was wrong. I didn't read the rest of the article.
Edited on Thu Dec-31-09 05:29 PM by johnaries
"Investigators promised the men that their statements were to be used only for the internal inquiry and would not be introduced in a criminal case. Such limited immunity deals are common in police departments so officers involved in shootings cannot hold up internal investigations by refusing to cooperate.

The deal meant that prosecutors had to build their case without using those statements. Urbina said the Justice Department failed to do so. Prosecutors read those statements, reviewed them in the investigation and used them to get search warrants, Urbina said."

Yes, apparently the prosecutors broke their promise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. After fully reading the article, it seems to say that the State Dept
promised immunity to the five who were responsible and had to build their case around evidence outside the statements the State Dept ordered the mercenaries to provide--statements that admitted their culpability. But prosecutors used those statements to gather more evidence, etc. Fruit from a poisonous tree and all that. So....the bushies succeeded again in undermining the judicial system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Maybe the Bush DOJ intentionally went overboard w/ grants of immunity
so the case would be impossible to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. No, immunity is given to lesser participants to prosecute the main actors.
This f'g judge thought the stories the immunized witnesses told were contradictory and not credible. Sounds like the DOJ didn't have its A-team on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Please read the article in OP
"Urbina said the prosecutors ignored the advice of senior Justice Department officials and built their case on sworn statements that had been given under a promise of immunity. Urbina said that violated the guards' constitutional rights. He dismissed the government's explanations as "contradictory, unbelievable and lacking in credibility"

It wasn't the immunized witnesses that the judge considered contradictory and not credible - it was the prosecutors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. There shouldn't be "immunity" for murderers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Upon going into Iraq, Bush gave blanket immunity through an EO to all contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That may well be, but that isn't the immunity that was violated in this case n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Please cite
As all I find relating to contractors in Iraq and any EO is the one having to do with oil production, not potential criminal activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Executive Order 13303 Link below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah, I saw that one
And it relates to contractors in oil related activities.

Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. this gets the Holiday News Dump Audacity award.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. 17 murders unpunished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Xe/Blackwater: We need to start referring to it by both names
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. Boy. This is going to create a lot more terrorists against the U.S. I'll bet.
And I don't blame them a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC