Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich to work with Norquist to dismantle the Obama Administration - Are We Going to Applaud This?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:56 AM
Original message
Kucinich to work with Norquist to dismantle the Obama Administration - Are We Going to Applaud This?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:16 PM by berni_mccoy
Really? Are we going to cheerlead Dennis into Whitewatering the Obama Administration at the bequest of Grover Norquist. Is this what this place has come to? I'm just glad it's Kucinich who has picked up this banner, because you know it will go nowhere. Criticizing the Obama administration for not being an ardent defender of the PO is one thing, but being used by the ultra-right to drum up an investigation is simply going to far. Go ahead and cheer away though, if that's what you really want. I won't. In fact, I'm going to throw tomatoes whenever I can at this kind of insanity.


For those asking for a link here it is, from FDL: http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/12/30/kucinich-to-investigate-fanniefreddie-bailout/

And for those asking how Kucinich is working with Norquist, remember who requested this investigation and made a big stink about it: Hamsher/Norquist bipartisan duo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's just an investigation---If Rahm did nothing shady, he should be fine. Besides--
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM by rudy23
he can ignore the left b/c we have no place else to go, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. So was Whitewater. So was Lewinsky. Both were orchestrated by the likes of Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Bill "orchestrated" lewinsky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Doesn't matter. It was a private matter.
Ken Starr and company wanted to exploit this for political reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM
Original message
Not the investigation. 25 million dollars wasted by Repukes investigating Bill's sex life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
144. Well, he at least wrote the flute part.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #144
154. Wrote? No that was free-form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. That's what was said about the Whitewater investigation.
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM by tblue37
But although the Clintons were cleared of all wrongdoing--and they actually lost money on the deal--the accusations were trumpeted loudly on the front pages of newspapers and from the broadcast desks of corporate media mouthpieces, whereas the admissions that there was no "there" there were whispered in the darkests corners of the back pages, or not at all.

Being loudly and publicly slimed inevitably does harm, even if the accusations turn out to be invalid. Even if RE turns out to be innocent, this loud public sliming will inevitably taint the public's perception of Obama, which is, of course, Norquist's goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. That's why you NEVER team up with Norquist--EVER
He is the enemy, for cryin' out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Be very skeptical whenever you hear the word "just" uttered by an R or a Xian.
It's never "just" anything. It's never "only." It's never insignificant.

It's always the first step down a slippery slope, and it never ends well for the forces of good in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Democrats are incapable of doing shitty things?
My goodness, I was unaware that democrats were immune from the temptations of human nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. If "we" do it, it's not "shitty".
You know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
49. Sorry, but I will always make the assumption that the involvement of Norquist
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM by stopbush
in an investigation means it is a witch hunt. And Norquist only goes after Ds, not Rs. And he only goes after Ds near the top of the heap.

Doesn't that make you the least bit skeptical about this?

There's that little thingy about those who forget the past...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. First your comparison to White Water
This is not an investigation into a past matter when the occupant of the Oval Office was in another office, it is an investigation into a very current action of the administration.

Congress has the responsibility to monitor the actions of the Executive Branch. They do not suspend that authority when a member of their political party is the head of the Executive Branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #58
79. WTF?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:22 PM by stopbush

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Original message
Dennis is looking into the Christmas Eve decision to provide more money
He is not investigating the Chief of Staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
129. He's investigating the Treasury, not FM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:05 PM
Original message
So DK is launching an investigation into something that happened LESS THAN A WEEK AGO.
I doubt very much that enough details are known at this point to even warrant considering an investigation. Maybe DK should try a phone call first.

At least the Whitewater guys waited a couple of years before starting their witch hunt.

Absolute grand standing on DK's part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
203. 200 billion dollars was just allocated to a private entity under government control
I think a hearing is in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
157. And was it a witch hunt when Norquist said this about Bush' violation of FISA laws:
Grover Norquist, a principal organizer of the conservative movement who is close to the Bush White House and usually supports its policies, says, "If you interpret the Constitution's saying that the president is commander in chief to mean that the president can do anything he wants and can ignore the laws you don't have a constitution: you have a king." He adds, "They're not trying to change the law; they're saying that they're above the law and in the case of the NSA wiretaps they break it."

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19092
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
216. Nice how you blurred all "Xians" into one conspiratorial group
with the Repubs, no less. And I'm supposed to take you seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. Freddie Mac was already investigated.
And fined. And reorganized under government supervision.

What did Rahm get away with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM
Original message
Well the OP is misrepresenting the nature of the inquiry
Which isn't surprising you put the words Fire Dog Lake, Dennis Kucinuch, and Fannie and Freddie Mae in a paragraph and people with reactionary minds will throw a temper tantrum.

Dennis is doing an inquiry into the Administrations Christmas Eve decision. It is a current affair and relevant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
142. Okay, I googled it.
And fail to see anything that suggests Rahm had any direct influence over the Treasury Department's decision - other than the accusations of Norquist & Hamsher.

I don't entirely agree with the action, but it's nothing different from what Geithner & Co. have been doing since they hit office - and there's at least a reasonable explanation for it. Since the banks aren't doing the lending - despite their TARP payouts - I guess it's better to help keep Freddie and Fannie afloat. At least they're under direct government control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #51
96. This is concerning the Christmas eve bailout of fannie-Freddie.
But you did not hear about that , did you??? THAT IS THE POINT !!!!It "appears" that was timed to bury the story. That alone is cause for at least a preliminary investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I won't be applauding
But I'm sure many fans of the One True Democrat will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, we've come full circle.
"I'm just glad it's Kucinich who has picked up this banner, because you know it will go nowhere." :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
62. I liked that line, too. It rings true. Dennis will never be more than a sideshow in DC.
I like DK, but no one in DC listens to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
174. Yes, thank god we will never know the truth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did DK expressly join with Norquist? I can't believe he is that stupid. Li'l context here? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Actually I think an investigation is warrented
And I certainly think the Obama administration would be better off without Rahm Emmanual.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. Sorry, that dog won't hunt. It's already been investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
66. Fair enough - i still the administration would be better of without Rahm Emmanual. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kucinich is an attention seeking piece of shit
PRIMARY THAT LITTLE FUCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. nice language
tells more about YOU than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Rahm sucks ass.
If he has done nothing wrong than he should not worry, if he has he should quit now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
53. You dislike one man
So you're willing to throw away every gain made since the defeat of 2004, throw away a Democratic president, throw away EVERYTHING over bogus charges that have already been investigated? Even investigations that show absolutely no wrongdoing will damage those being investigated. Whitewater, though there was no there there, lead to impeahcment.

What a childish and arrogant thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Original message
No, just toss Rahm to the curb, the rest will be better for it.
What ever happened to more open government?? The way the White House tried to slide this huge bail-out by un-noticed, is reason enough to open an investigation. You have a problem with transparency in government?? Or do you just keep the mindset that anything this administration does is right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Original message
You want to destroy Obama to get at Rahm
That's childish and arrogant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
102. Your nutz! IMO dumping Rahm would be a plus for Obama. Your logic is faulty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #102
121. You aren't using logic at all
Obviously.

Your opinion is thus meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #121
151. Ok, Rahm..
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #151
171. You bet, Ralph
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
84. Yes the whitewater investigation was kept alive by a Republican congress..
for political reasons, but remember it was Bill Clintons lying that led to impeachment. (Granted that can-o-worms might or might not have opened up on it's own. )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
178. So does Rahm. Therein lies the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. They have already investigated it /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
106. The Christmas eve bail-out??? Really???
you need to "catch-up".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
117. +10,000
fuck the gnome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
124. That's what Karl Rove said.
What, exactly, is your problem with Kucinich, WeDidIt? You seem fixated on something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #124
168. it's rahm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
179. He's a Democratic Congressman who does his job.Your
description would be better applied to Rahm Emanuel. I have never heard Kucinich slam Democrats who worked hard to get their party a majority. Rahm on the other hand is a different story. Maybe you agree with him that 'the left' whatever that is, should be ignored? I like my Reps to pay attention to what their constituents have to say about issues. Dennis does that. If Rahm had been on the Democratic ticket they would have lost. And if people had known he was to be given so much power in this administration, the outcome might have been different.

The OP is disingenuous but nice try I suppose. I want to see the link to back up that 'Kucinich is working with Norquist' before launching into a diatribe and end up looking like a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
217. Said the attention-seeking...
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rahm needs to go. I don't give a flying fuck who does the job. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. That is Obama decision, not yours /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Wake up! I'm not the only one who wants Rahm gone. nt
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM by earth mom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nice to know the Repubs can still use divide and conquer to their advantage
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
134. It worked with Van Jones. He was gone in a heartbeat. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'll be throwing tomatoes with you, but
do you have a link? I somehow missed this new turn of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. +1. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. yes, link it
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:08 PM by dave29
disregard -- I see it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Not surprising that you're willling to blindly follow the lemmings when they jump
Kucinich is opening up an investigation into the Freddy/Fanny bailout and the lifting of their lending caps. This is a worthy and much needed investigation.

It was reported in another thread here, with a link to Hamsher's site.

The OP now is claiming, through twisted logic and intellectual dishonesty, that Kucinich is teaming up with Norquist.

Still willing to take that leap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM
Original message
Get stuffed. I asked for a link for confirmation. Too bad you
don't like my opinions. Guess what? I can't stand yours. Put me on ignore, and I'll do likewise, but you're a nasty, condescending person on a message board. I thought encouraging different opinions was kind of the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. You have opinions?
I've only seen cut-and-pastes of other people's opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
61. Nah, I won't put you on ignore, you're too entertaining
Besides, I make it a rule never to put anybody on ignore, you know, encouraging different opinions, etc.

Yes, you did ask for confirmation, but not before you stated that you would join the OP in his "throwing tomatoes" etc.

Again, not looking before you leap. I hope you learn from it.

Peace:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. I think the "link" is their attempt at association. They will tie anything to Kuch, Nader, ponies
Hamsher, words like "fuck" and "piece of shit."

Association is a basic psychological tactic, sort of how Rove got people to associate 9/11 with Iraq. They believe that if you can tie all criticisms of Obama to funny looking Dennis Kucinich, you can somehow make them all go away along with his 5% he polls in the presidential elections, or something like that. Watch how many times you'll see this association attempted in the coming days, now that Kucinich is asserting that the investigation go forward.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. FDL has it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #52
183. No he's not. This is something entirely different. Did you even
read Kucinich's own statement, or do you just want to believe your own fantasies?

Please provide some links to back up your claims, many people have asked you to do so. Now you've made another claim, which I have taken the trouble to find support for and have been unable to do so.

I will check back to see your links and if none are provided you just lost a whole lot of credibility.

FYI what Kucinich is investigating just happened this past week and has nothing to do with Rahm Emanuel. Unless you are talking about something else altogether. If so, then provide some backup for it as I can't find anything remotely close to what you are claiming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Another day, another smear thread. I know you prefer 'em corporate but this is just ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. garbage
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:11 PM by G_j
still waiting for a link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. More intellectual dishonesty on your part, not surprising.
Kucinich is opening up an investigation in the Freddie/Fannie Mac bailout, and the lifting of lending caps. A worthy thing to do.

You, simply because it was first reported on Hamsher's site, are now claiming that Kucinich is teaming up with Norquist.

You are being intellectually dishonest, and are showing your true colors in this. Nothing but a DLC/Obama cheerleader who is void of any logic or intellectual honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. If the administration is above board on this
Than they have nothing to fear and either do you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Wow. That's naive. Just like Clinton had nothing to fear from Whitewater,
where he did nothing wrong.

Funny how Whitewater evolved into an investigation into a blow job and ended up with impeachment.

But Bill had nothing to fear from a little ol' WW investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. This is not a special prosecuter
It is a congressional hearing. So go on with your bad self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
169. Not familiar with the "special prosecuter" law at the time, are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Kucinich to work with Norquist" Link?
or is this just slander born of "Norquist wants it investigated, therefor anyone who also wants it investigated works for Norquist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Yes: proof, please.
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:10 PM by StarfarerBill
Just because Norquist in his usual scummy way is making hay off of this issue, doesn't mean that an investigation of Emanuel isn't called for. Nor is Dennis making common cause with Norquist simply because he wants Emanuel investigated, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. At FDL:
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/12/30/kucinich-to-investigate-fanniefreddie-bailout/

Who started this request for an investigation? Oh yeah, Hamsher/Norquist Team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. Just as I thought: Complete Slander.
Alerted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Who Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #59
185. There is no connection to what Hansher was asking for
which was an investigation into Rahm Emanuel, and what Kucinich is talking about. Your OP is libelous unless you can back it up.

What Kucinich, in his own words which you might have taken the trouble to read, is asking for is an investigation into where any additional funds going to Fannie/Freddie as a result of a lifting on the cap which JUST OCCURRED on Christmas Eve, will be going. He wants to make sure they are not going to Wall St and to ensure that Main St. will be receiving some of them.

Your OP is pure fantasy. From your own link that is obvious. I ask you again, please post a link to show that Kucinich has joined with Norquist to investigate an old Rahm Emanuel allegation? You can't because nothing could be further from the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
67. There's a link where you can donate to Dennis through Act Blue
If you want to thank him for investigating this alleged attempt at a backdoor TARP program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. Done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
69. Norquist is nowhere on that page
Do you believe Fannie/Freddie Mac should be investigated. All you're doing here with this attack on Kucinich's call for an investigation (as part of your unfailing defense of this administration's shit sandwiches) is standing with those who would shield Freddie/Fannie miscreants from accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #74
82. so you're against anyone else investigating? That's the bottom line of your complaints
Fannie/Freddie should be off the hook because some conservative has also called for an investigation? What demagoguery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #82
131. Dude, he's not investigating FM... he's going after the Treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. If this is the case,
then it is an exact rerun of what the Clintons went through in the 1990s, and it was all for perceived political gain.

Obama's policy problems are a direct result of his being a neoliberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Where is the link that Kucinich is working with norquist? Don't get me wrong this fannie/freedie
has already been investigated, and this is just a diversion. I know a lot of folks here are unhappy that they are being bailed out, but in my view, things would be so much worse if they didn't provide the liquidity and bail them out along with the financial institutions

The real argument should be bringing back regulation, and not rewarding the people who got us into the issue

Congress allowed the lax lending practices which allowed people to get loans they were not qualified for, with the pretext that this would help encourage home ownership. That is where the problem really originated, and both sides of the aisle bear responsibility for this



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. Linky please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
38. inappropriate post
slanderous accusations against a Democrat w/ no links.
disruptive flame bait
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Kucinich announced it himself and it was posted on FDL. Google it friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. it's not my OP nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. The person who makes an assertion bears the burden of proving it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Link here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
76. And where in all that is one word, one implication that Dennis is joining forces with Norquist?
Your OP is a cognitive bridge-too-far, I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #76
86. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #86
100. So? Let make Norquist play his political games; that's what he *does*.
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:29 PM by StarfarerBill
Investigating corruption is more important than worrying about who started what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #100
108. Just like whitewater eh? He's using Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #108
115. Or Dennis recognizes corruption when he sees it.
Tell me: had Dennis initiated his investigation before Hamsher and Norquist made their separate call for an enquiry, would you be calling Dennis a patsy then? Or is Dennis to be smeared no matter what, simply because Norquist has anything to do with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #115
133. Timing and placement of the announcement are definitely suspect here. And he's not investigating FM
it's the Treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #133
138. See Allentown Jake's OP on this subject: he's nutshelled it better than I ever could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #41
63. Here is Kucinich's full statement, please show me where he says he is working with Grover Norquist
As Chairman of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, I'm announcing that the Subcommittee will launch an investigation into the Treasury Department's recent decision to lift the current $400-billion cap on combined federal assistance to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, opening the way for additional, unlimited funds through the end of 2012. This investigation will include the role played by Fannie Mae chief executive Michael J. Williams and Freddie Mac chief executive Charles E. Haldeman in the decision, if any, and will seek to ensure that the additional assistance is used for homeowners and not Wall Street.

Many questions remain unanswered regarding this move by the Treasury. Why suddenly remove the cap? Indications are that Freddie and Fannie, even as millions of Americans lose their homes, have used just $111 billion of the $400 billion previously available to them. Is lifting the cap on assistance a back-door TARP?

Additionally, I want to determine whether Fannie and Freddie have a cohesive plan to buy up the under-performing mortgages that remain on the books of the big banks, at appropriate prices, and undertake a massive reworking of the terms of the mortgages so as to stem the foreclosure crisis that continues to plague our country.This new authority must be used responsibly and for the benefit of American families. This cannot be used simply to purchase toxic assets at inflated prices, thus transferring the losses to the U. S. taxpayers and acting as a back-door TARP.

As a result of a curiously-timed Christmas Eve announcement by the Treasury Department, the mortgage giants will have access to unlimited funds without having to come back to Congress. Since the federal government is the majority owner of both companies, their operations will remain under Administration control.

This relationship between Treasury and Fannie and Freddie bears inspection, particularly in the wake of reports that the mortgage giants' chief executives will now receive $900,000 each in annual compensation, bonuses of up to $6 million each, and an additional $42 million in special compensation will be spread among a dozen other executives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #65
75. Just because Norquist wanted an investigation does not mean Kucinich is working with Norquist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #75
83. You're right. He's Being a TOOL for Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #83
99. This has nothing to do with Norquist, stop playing guilt by a very flimsy association
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #99
116. Rrrriiiiggghhhhtttt.... a week ago Hamsher/Norquist team up to send a letter to the AG
to investigate FM. Now FDL is plastering it's front page with DK's announcement that he'll investigate, including a nice bit of slander against Rahm in their article.

How blind are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #116
127. Pat Buchanan opposed the Iraq War...
Do you believe that means that all those who oppose the Iraq War are allies of Pat Buchanan?

The fact that there is a right-winger who wants an investigation into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac does not mean that particular right-winger represents all of the people who want that investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #127
136. and he opposed NAFTA
guess lots of us are now in league with Pat.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
40. Obama shook W's hand. does that make him a traitor as well? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
42. I guess Grover and I are partners too.
Glad you pointed this out.

Rahm is a dirt bag and needs to be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. lie much?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM by bigtree
Produce one scrap of proof that Kucinich is 'working with' Norquist. ONE.


Kucinich on Norquist in 2005: http://socialsecurity.kucinich.us/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1&Itemid=1

Why would this administration attempt to kill the most successful anti-poverty program in our history? An earned benefit based on your full work history? Frankly, from a number of White House memos and materials written by conservatives over the years, it is clear that conservatives hate Social Security as the last major vestige of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. These are the Grover Norquist people running this government (and the "K" Street Project) who talk about drowning government in a bathtub, people who can't manage disasters like Hurricane Katrina because they don't want government to work. They simply want it to wither away and for everyone to fend for themselves. The true goal of their "ownership society" -- according to some pointed but telling humor -- is "to have everyone on their own." Atomizing, dividing and pitting one group against another is their method. While they may not express a belief in evolution, they like to at least see Social Darwinism in action.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Already posted link above. Read it and weep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
77. Norquist isn't mentioned at all on the page you linked to
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:19 PM by bigtree
This is just another BM smear of Rep. Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #81
90. so an investigation of Fannie/ Freddie is really an investigation of the Obama administration iyo?
Revealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #90
126. It's not an investigation of FM... it's of the Treasury Department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM
Original message
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the Obama administration? You may be on to something.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
60. haha, +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
107. +1 LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
110. Like Whitewater was about the Clinton Administration too.
You've shown your both naive and blind at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #110
118. So, protecting corporations from investigation is now "progressive"?
Or, public officials?

Oh, right! If it's our guys with their fingers in the cookie jar, bailing out corporations, escalating a lost war, it must be good for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #118
128. It's not a corporation he's planning to investigate. It's the Treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #128
182. So? Is the treasury immune from investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. "To dismantle the Obama administration."
A little hyberbole for breakfast? :eyes:

To answer your question:

1. DK isn't working to dismantle Obama's administration.

2. I support dismantling Obama's administration to the point that there are no more dlc/corporo-fascist/3rd way/"new" dems left. If he'd put together an acceptable administration to begin with, it wouldn't need dismantling.

3. I don't object to the investigation of Rahm Emmanuel. Trancparency and accountability...those words somehow ring a bell.

4. Grover Norquist and I have 2 completely different agendas. He wants to put his faction back in power. I want to remove the faction that is using the Democratic Party to move the nation further right...TOWARDS Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #57
70. What do you think Norquist's agenda is? And what exactly do you think will get done
if such an investigation is taken up? Let me give you a clue: NOTHING. Exactly what Repukes want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #70
147. Norquist's agenda
is to put the rw, and the Republican party, in power.

What do I think will get done if such an investigation is taken up?

I'd like to see Emmanuel either clearly vindicated, or NOT. If not, I'd like to see him resign.

Let me be honest. I'd love to see him discredited and fired whether or not any investigation takes place. I don't think that's going to happen, but I can still "hope" for some positive "change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
64. Kucinich is so jealous of our President
It gets more obvious everyday as he joins with Right Wing Nazis to attack our President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #64
80. Or maybe he wants to stop another TARP from happening, for our benefit. It's not all that emo.
Besides, the guys in Don Caballero wouldn't approve of Rahm's ethics. I know this for a fact.

I disapprove of the screenname :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #80
113. Only one original member of Don Cab
Who knows what they think? I can guarantee that they support President Obama over Rep. Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #113
149. I knew their tour manager, I'll bet you a vegan dinner on that.
That's from the early '00s--can't keep track of how many original members they had then. I can tell you this--D.C. is not down with the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
68. Link to the words of the Arrogant Elf himself
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:17 PM by WeDidIt
(note, I'll call Kucinich an arrogant elf as long as assholes here call Rahm an Angry Dwarf)

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Treasury-s-Assistance-to-F-by-Dennis-Kucinich-091229-963.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #68
87. This is what I was talking about when I was talking about word association.
They're aggressively trying to BRAND Kucinich with the psychological tactic of association that Rove used on his base. You'll see this 100 more times today, watch for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #68
91. Nope; still nothing about Norquist.
Investigating corruption is a good thing, and Dennis is launching a separate, Congressionally-led enquiry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #91
94. WHO Requested the Investigation? Oh yeah... Hamsher/Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #94
104. See reply #100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #104
112. There isn't one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #112
120. In your defense, this thread is getting crowded:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #94
111. So Rick Davis and McCain are off the hook for their associations and involvement w/ F/FMac?
. . . just because Norquist agrees there should be an investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #91
109. Norquist and Hamsher requested an investigation
The Arrogant Elf complied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #109
114. so have many Democratic legislators
You would have Congress look the other way just because some conservative hack agrees? That's little more than just cover for the miscreants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #114
119. Bullshit. This is a witch hunt against Emanuel and you know it.
The calls legislators have made have been about the organization, not Emanuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #119
159. The only witch hunt I see is YOURS against anything that Jane Hamsher may like.
Hardly makes you a unbiased commentator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #109
130. So? If they're right, the corruption should be investigated and punished.
If they're wrong, Emanuel will be vindicated and can continue his center-right advising of the President.

And he's Congressman Dennis Kucinich, not the Arrogant Elf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #130
140. What corruption?
You have assumptions and allegations, but no evidence of any corruption.

So you're willing to witch hunt the Obama administration because of a dislike for Rahm Emmanuel.

Childish and arrogant.

I could add stupid on top of that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #68
146. No, Geithner is the Elf
Dennis is a "hobbit"... geezus, do I have to explain everything to you Rahmbots? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #68
172. Nothing in there to link this to anyone other then Dennis.
Again you make accusations knowing them to be false. What does that make you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #68
194. Have YOU read Kucinich's words yourself?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 03:50 PM by sabrina 1
As Chairman of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, I’m announcing that the Subcommittee will launch an investigation into the Treasury Department’s recent decision to lift the current $400-billion cap on combined federal assistance to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, opening the way for additional, unlimited funds through the end of 2012. This investigation will include the role played by Fannie Mae chief executive Michael J. Williams and Freddie Mac chief executive Charles E. Haldeman in the decision, if any, and will seek to ensure that the additional assistance is used for homeowners and not Wall Street.

........


As a result of a curiously-timed Christmas Eve announcement by the Treasury Department, the mortgage giants will have access to unlimited funds without having to come back to Congress. Since the federal government is the majority owner of both companies, their operations will remain under Administration control.

This relationship between Treasury and Fannie and Freddie bears inspection, particularly in the wake of reports that the mortgage giants' chief executives will now receive $900,000 each in annual compensation, bonuses of up to $6 million each, and an additional $42 million in special compensation will be spread among a dozen other executives.


And you want this covered up, no oversight of tax dollars by Congress? He deserves answers to these questions, on our behalf. This is how we got into the situation we are in the first place, no oversight. Good for Kucinich and I hope other Democrats will join him.

And btw, since this so recent, this action by the Treasury Dept. headed by a man we can all trust to work on our behalf :sarcasm: where is the mention of Rahm Emanuel? Was he involved in this decision? I can't find anything to say he was. Weren't we told the as COS Rahm would not be involved in policy decisions? So why all the hysteria over Rahm who appears to have nothing to do with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Original message
unrec for the BS factor
:puke:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
72. All Obama has to do is get on TV and say any HC reform MUST have a public option...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
73. Is Firedoglake a lib/lefty site? The 'comments' section are generally favorable to DK's efforts
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #73
85. Yep, they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. Cool!...figured as much by all the + feedback in the comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #85
92. They WERE. Until Hamsher went on a Jihad against Obama and decided to work with Norquist and enlist
Teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
78. I don't think I remember
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:36 PM by G_j
quite so MANY asses being on DU at one time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #78
98. Let's just say Afghanistan is not the only place where there's been a surge of troops, recently.
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM by rudy23
If you know what I'm driving at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM
Original message
+1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
89. Oh noes!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
93. Did anyone read the article? Hamsher may be crowing but in fact Kucinich seems more interested in
what Fannie/Freddie is currently doing and not what Rahm Emmanuel did in the past. I don't believe that Dennis is teaming up with Norquist to go after the President or Emmanuel. I really dislike Hamsher but I think she is putting her own spin on this, not what Dennis is actually saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #93
101. Yes, I just read through the link and that was my conclusion as well. Hamsher seems to be trying to
sidle up to Kucinich to add credibility to her cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #101
123. If that is all it is, then Kucinich better come out and verbally distance himself from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #123
132. Or what, you'll call him mean names some more?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:41 PM by JVS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #132
135. No, that's what I expect of you. Oh, you deleted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #135
137. HAHAHAHAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
97. Another failed attempt to smear DK
Boring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #97
103. It's a failed attempt by FDL to smear Emanuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #103
175. He's plenty "smeared" already. shit-smeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
105. Stop, drop and roll, Your pants are on fire ! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #105
155. LOL! - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
122. kucinich speaks truth to power and he speaks for me....
I support Kucinich-- if he thinks this needs doing, then I tend to agree. Kucinich represents my political interests, while the DLC and Rahm Emmanuel certainly do not. You might call that cheerleading-- I call it honest political representation. There's WAY too little of that in today's democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
125. This appears to just be more Kucinich's grandstanding
it seems to me Jane is just deceptively (like most of what she does) trying to use a different issue to try and bolster her GOP approved White Water plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
139. Let me start by saying unequivocally that I have NO IDEA what the fuck you're hair's on fire about
But I will say this, based on the replies to this thread ....... if there is malfeasance, we have a right to know.

I will *also* say that Hamsher and Norquist are both fringers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
141. Good for DK. It's not like he's asking us to "look forward" past the crimes of Bush/Cheney.
Now that would be something that should really make us mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #141
150. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #141
152. Yeah, Kucinich did so well with that impeachment stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #152
158. Maybe he'd have been more successful if Senator Fierce Advocate had helped a bit.
Remind me again what Obama did to stop Bush and Cheney while he was in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #158
160. Right because Impeachment begins in the Senate.
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 01:37 PM by berni_mccoy
How far will you go to prove your a dufus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #160
161. Well, I won't fuck up basic English, if that's what you mean.
I also won't play stupid and pretend that I was speaking procedurally instead of politically.

Now answer the question: what did Senator Obama do to stop Bush/Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #161
162. Simple: He got elected. If you think Bush/Cheney would have stopped with Bush/Cheney
then your a bigger moron than you've let on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #162
166. Wow, someone's had an extra glass of Carnation Instant Hysteria this morning.
And just so we're straight: WE got Obama elected. Never forget who's supposed to be running this nuthouse.


But back to the subject you continue to dodge: what, exactly, did Senator Obama do to stand up to Bush/Cheney? Anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #166
180. * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise *
I thought so. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #166
199. Right because Obama did nothing to get elected. Your such epic fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #199
214. You are = you're. Learn it. Love it.
Still haven't answered the question, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #160
163. Impeachment 'begins' in the House, berni.
The House impeaches, the Senate tries the impeached individual.

You should try to get your own facts straight before you accuse others of ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #163
167. correct
thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #163
195. You missed the sarcasm. The person I was responding to felt it was Obama's responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #160
192. impeachment begins in the house.
but feel free to going on proving who's the real dufus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #192
196. Sarcasm fail.
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 03:45 PM by berni_mccoy
Dufus. The person I was responding to felt it was Obama's responsibility to Impeach Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #196
200. oh. right. 'sarcasm'.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
143. Since we have apparently accepted the fact that this is a Center
Right Country. Center Right is Republican Party Territory.
nothing will surprise me anymore.

No Democrat seems to the Center from Center Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
145. Berni, I'd consider limiting it to 2 cups of coffee in the morning
Just a suggestion. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
148. Kucinich is one of the politicians I distrust the least. If he thinks there is something to look
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 01:12 PM by Edweird
into then I wouldn't object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
153. Wow, there must be some kinda powerful crap coming out to dismantle the whole administration nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #153
156. No shit. Obama is powerless before people like Harry Reid and Dennis Kucinich.
I didn't realize we'd elected such a fragile little flower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
164. Translation: "OMG Freddie and Fannie are going to be investigated...
This could reach *gulp* Rahm! To the battlements!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #164
176. We can only hope it reaches rahm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
165. Baseless McCarthyite smears of Democrats
This is what keeps your opinions from being taken seriously, and far more than you could imagine, has prevented you from having any power to do anything but point fingers, create guilt by association, once removed no less, and slander a Democratic Congressman for doing his oversight duties.
Did you approve of the no oversight, rubber stamp Republican Congress under Bush, refusing to investigate their own because they were their own?
Your tactics and methods are so deplorable that even when I agree with your point, I can never agree with your posts. Really the opposite of what I consider honest politics. List makers and association trackers are the natural enemy of democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #165
173. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #165
188. Like Hamsher is doing with Rahm? That's what this is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #188
191. This is NOT about Rahm Emanuel, unless you think
he's involved in some more nefarious deeds. You've been asked over and over again to prove what you're saying. So far you have ignored those requests.

I have resisted unrec'ing this as I rarely do that, but this is such a blatant lie and smear against a Democrat, I am going to unrec it. I gave you at least four opportunities to prove the OP is not outright lies. I'm not wasting any more time in this thread so unrec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
170. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
177. I don't see any need for hysterics here.
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 02:13 PM by freddie mertz
This is the first I heard of the deal.

Why was it decided on Xmas eve?

Looks fishy at first glance.

Why not investigate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
181. I've read your link and have concluded that your headline to say
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 02:36 PM by sabrina 1
the least, is misleading. Your question 'are we going to applaud this'? Applaud your claim that 'Kucinich is working with Norquist' or applaud what he is actually doing?

Do you applaud him looking into possible wrongdoing by Freddie Mac and the McCain campaign? Because that is part of what he is doing ~

Having actually read the link to Kucinich's statement, I find nothing in it to support your headline.

For those who just reacted to the misleading headline in the OP, this is the actual headline from FDL:

Kucinich to Investigate Fannie/Freddie Bailout

And this is what he is actually doing in his own words:

As Chairman of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, I’m announcing that the Subcommittee will launch an investigation into the Treasury Department’s recent decision to lift the current $400-billion cap on combined federal assistance to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, opening the way for additional, unlimited funds through the end of 2012. This investigation will include the role played by Fannie Mae chief executive Michael J. Williams and Freddie Mac chief executive Charles E. Haldeman in the decision, if any, and will seek to ensure that the additional assistance is used for homeowners and not Wall Street.


He wants to know if any of the tax dollars we keep funneling to Wall St is now going to go through this channel. And most importantly he wants to know if THE AMERICAN PEOPLE are going to benefit at all from this latest flow of funds or is all going to be funneled again, to Wall St.

I certainly do applaud what he is doing. This is what Congress ought to be doing. This is tax payer money. Do you object to Congress wanting to know what is being done with our money?

And I think you should either change your headline, or provide a link to back up your claim. You left out an awful of very important information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #181
201. Excellent analysis and the headline is indeed misleading. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
184. Actual title of Kucinich's announcment:Treasury's Assistance to Fannie and Freddie
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Treasury-s-Assistance-to-F-by-Dennis-Kucinich-091229-963.html

Opening paragraph:

As Chairman of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, I'm announcing that the Subcommittee will launch an investigation into the Treasury Department's recent decision to lift the current $400-billion cap on combined federal assistance to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, opening the way for additional, unlimited funds through the end of 2012. This investigation will include the role played by Fannie Mae chief executive Michael J. Williams and Freddie Mac chief executive Charles E. Haldeman in the decision, if any, and will seek to ensure that the additional assistance is used for homeowners and not Wall Street.

Mentions of Norquist: none found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #184
186. Bastard! Seeking to ensure the money is used for homeowner and not Wall Street!
How dare he?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
187. YES - stop exaggerating. Rahm needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #187
198. Witch Hunt It IS! WOOHOO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
189. Another let's smear Kucinich thread.
He's one of the few politicians out there holding the rest of the corrupt bunch's feet to the fire. If we don't have the likes of him and Bernie Sanders keeping them honest, then you won't see any end to the policies started in the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #189
202. Never any shortage of em at DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
190.  WHO Didn't See This BS Thead Coming? Oh yeah... LOL!
:eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
193. So are you against transparency or against Congressional oversight?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 03:34 PM by mmonk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
197. The soiled laundry over at FireDogLake should probably not be
hung up on a front-yard clothesline for decent folks to see.

Hamsher is entitled to her strategies but so then are her detractors entitled to call her a shrieking narcissist, a sore loser, a marginal hack, and a debasing self-centered harpie, not to put too fine a point on it.

Bring a torch, Isabella.

An almost unlimited gift as a film-maker but a real horse's ass when it comes to politics.

Grover Norquist?! Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
204. Mods are locking flamefests...Good thing this fine example of truth...
remains free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #204
205. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #205
206. I see it brings a tear to your eye too...
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 06:15 PM by Junkdrawer
*sniff* One of DU's finer moments!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #206
208. perhaps a good sign
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 06:36 PM by G_j
or a silver lining

I suppose people are afraid of Kucinich because of what he does and says, as he happens to walk his talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #204
209. Posts you don't agree with become flamefests because you intentionally turn them into one
And hope they get locked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
207. More breathless wheezing in attempt to keep any tarnish off the Obama admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
210. Hypocrite
Your hero, Barack Obama, had a campaign on the entire concept of working with the right wing. And yet you try to attack actual progressives for doing what your hero talked about doing?

Amazingly hypocritcal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #210
211. You wouldn't know a hypocrite if they came up and bit you
There's a huge difference between going back on a campaign promise and going on a witch-hunt to take out the Chief of Staff and damage the administration. Hamsher is anything but a progressive and Kucinich is a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #211
213. Back on campaign promises?
Lets see...

Obama wishes to work with the right wing to hurt this country and benefit the corporates.

Kucinich wants to investigate corporate corruption.

So, working with the right wing is only ok with you if it helps the corporates and continues this corruption filled mess the country currently is in?

Obama has damaged his own administration being an awful continuation of Bush. Thank god we have true patriots like Dennis Kucinich who actually care about us instead of the corporate bosses that run this country and steal our money.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
212. Kucinich.
Sometimes he is so way off base it ain't funny. Typical zealot. Cannot be reasoned with. Ever.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcablue Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
215. OP doesn't say what Kucinich wants to do. What's up with that?
Can you tell us what it is that Kucinich and Norquist want to do so, i.e., who they want to investigate, etc., we can agree or disagree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC