Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The liquid ban on airplanes is totally worthless!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:19 PM
Original message
The liquid ban on airplanes is totally worthless!
I find this current explosion story very interesting.

I have always wondered why the liquids are banned when anyone wanting to bring dangerous liquids on board would just hide them in a pocket or strap them to their leg.

Heck, my friend said he knows he could wear his water camel back pack full of water on board under his clothes, like the one he wears biking, and no one could tell.

I always wondered what stopped someone from taping an inter tube to their leg full of anything they wanted. How would security know?

It sounds like this guy did something like this.

Wonder how in the world how they can prevent stuff like this without patting everyone down?

The next few weeks will be interesting.











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting for some, annoying for those of us flying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shares in my venture, Fly Naked Airlines, should soar come Monday
That seems the only answer, since they already have 'nekkid vision' capabilities for airport security.

Virtual naked just isn't enough. Fly Naked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. O hell no. Some of us, at our age should not fly naked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Depends on how you look at it.
If you think you shouldn't fly naked then maybe it would reduce the number of those flying cause they don't want to see you naked.

It would also keep fundamentalists from flying. Provided they have a policy that exposes anyone with their belief that flies naked.

Same for Muslims that prohibit exposing their flesh.

It would reduce the number of crying babies by about 30%.

It would cost less to fly the plane because there would be less baggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good points, especially the crying babies thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Disagree re the savings due to less baggage
People would have to get dressed once they deplane. Everyone would have to have a checked bag so they could leave the airport at their destinations.

It will make waiting around the baggage carousels more amusing though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. That might just "take off". You can bet your booties Islamix terrorists
wouldn't be onboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. The liquid thing is annoying. How can a plastic bag stop an explosive?
they ask you to put toothpaste and cream in a little baggy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Guess what, they're patting everyone down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Binary agent-filled breast implants.
That's a good 350+ cc's of each agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why does everyone get so bent out of shape about such trivialities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe they should take out our blood and freeze our bodies
through us in the cargo bay, and then thaw us all on arrival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. They have a body scanner that would detect this.
It's used selectively, but I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Taping an inter tube to their leg full of anything they wanted"
The examiner might think that the guy is hung like a Missouri mule and not want to go there (could cause quite a scene if the guy actuality is hung like a Missouri mule).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, so?
The TSA and other agencies have to look like Something Is Being Done. The dirty little open secret is that anyone who really wants to blow up a plane full of people is probably going to be able to do it. Same goes for any number of other horrific terroristic attacks. Heck, the United States carries out indiscriminate bombings of civilians without warning in other countries all the time. There are precautions that can be taken, for sure, but the rules being promulgated seem to be written by the most pants-wettingest contingent, designed for maximum disruption for the minimum increase in security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC