|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 08:26 AM Original message |
Lawrence O'Donnell just did a great job in pointing out an Achilles heel to Claire McAskill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newlib (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. he's turned out to be a very smart and smooth host |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. I just caught a bit of this and your OP filled in the rest of the discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 08:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Claire was definitely flummoxed and didn't have any good rejoinder for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. It will be interesting to see if that part makes it through comitee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corpseratemedia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
5. this is good to point out to those who blindly label as "republicans" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vi5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
6. A good example of this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
7. Claire was visibly pissed, eyes popping, not expecting actual questions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtrockville (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
8. We've always been at the mercy of our employer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 09:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yes, but now they have made it officially impossible for an employer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. This is an attack on union plans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I definitely see it as anti-union. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PRETZEL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 09:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I think I may disagree to some extent, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 10:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. That union even with more members is going to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PRETZEL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. normally I would agree, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
13. My son has a pre-existing condition ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 10:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Except that those people wil be rioting in the streets when they think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtrockville (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I'd be delighted if my tax dollars went toward helping you/your son. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
14. McCaskill is a walking achilles heel to the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC