Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The myth of Bipartisanship and the language of Deception

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:29 PM
Original message
The myth of Bipartisanship and the language of Deception


According to Merriam Webster

bi·par·ti·san
Pronunciation: \(ˌ)bī-ˈpär-tə-zən, -sən, -ˌzan, chiefly British ˌbī-ˌpär-tə-ˈzan\
Function: adjective
Date: 1895
: of, relating to, or involving members of two parties ; specifically : marked by or involving cooperation, agreement, and compromise between two major political parties

The Obama administration laid the grounds for their governance around the terms of bipartinship and compromise. It was the theme of their campaign and the supposed foundation for unity among the people.

Interestingly, the definition of COMPROMISE has two meanings. Apparently, the democratic have chosen the second definition to define their version of compromise because there current means of legislating, in no way, shape, or form meets the first definitions parameters:

1com·pro·mise
Pronunciation: \ˈkäm-prə-ˌmīz\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, mutual promise to abide by an arbiter's decision, from Anglo-French compromisse, from Latin compromissum, from neuter of compromissus, past participle of compromittere to promise mutually, from com- + promittere to promise — more at promise
Date: 15th century
1 a : settlement of differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual concessions b : something intermediate between or blending qualities of two different things
2 : a concession to something derogatory or prejudicial <a compromise of principles>

Bipartisanship has always been a deceptive talking point with this administration. It is impossible to be bipartisan with a opposition who will not concede any ground. It simply can't be done. However, the language of bipartisanship has been central to this administration in providing a rationalization to their supposed capitulation to the right....which isn't capitulation to the right. And, it not the capitulation of their own goals or objectives because they are enacting the policy objectives they were hired to represent.

Interestingly enough the term capitulation has two meanings as well though for the purposes of this discussion we are utilizing the latter:

: ca·pit·u·la·tion
Pronunciation: \kə-ˌpi-chə-ˈlā-shən\
Function: noun
Date: 1535
1 : a set of terms or articles constituting an agreement between governments
2 a : the act of surrendering or yielding b : the terms of surrender

The peoples' interests, rights, and welfare are being surrendered for the benefit of the corporate wealth. That is the capitulation that is occurring. This has been on-going for decades but it has increased and intensified rapidly since the election of Ronald Regan and it started to peak with George W Bush and it is meeting its cresendo under Barack Obama. The elaborate gamemanship that has developed between the two parties to provide cover for the corporate rule has been lifted with the broken promises of the Obama administration. The game could have continued a bit longer, perhaps, if the corporations gave even some small concessions to the people through the Obama admistration. But, that did not occur. Which leads us to our last definition and where we are now....

Hubris:

: hu·bris
Pronunciation: \ˈhyü-brəs\
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek hybris
Date: 1884
: exaggerated pride or self-confidence

The corporations and the politicians that they hire to represent their interests have become so emboldened, arrogant and blatant, they believe there is no boundary they can not break and no limit they can't push. And, it is not surprising that the powerful believe this fallacy. After all, they have been allowed to get away with it with little to no repurcussions in the past, they expect it can go on forever. Only it can't and it won't.

Obama is governing at the height of the Hubris. He believed he could continue to play the game, the same as always. He miscalculated. The people have been pushed past the point of endurance. The betrayal on health care reform is just the final straw.

This is a most critical point in our journey as a country. Here lies opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. G.Carlin's definition of bipartisan: A larger than usual DECEPTION is being carried out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely - and it is an opportunity. We're very aware of the smoke and mirrors now. k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Extremely well said. Not just for our country though.
There is sweat on the brow of our hubris, maybe just maybe the planet will finally get a breather from it.

We all have to move past the politicians and their owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It is going to take a lot of organization and on the ground work

We built our foundation around the democratic party, but really, it needs to be an independent organization that places good policy over party loyalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. KR+9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC