Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood. "first federal abortion restriction since ..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 12:55 PM
Original message
Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood. "first federal abortion restriction since ..."

http://c-span.org/homepage.asp

ON AMERICA & THE COURTS
"Partial Birth" Abortions

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a nationwide ban on "partial birth" abortions. Tonight, we present the oral argument, Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood. The law is the first federal abortion restriction since the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision establishing a constitu-
tional right to end a pregnancy.
SATURDAY, C-SPAN, 7PM ET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. more of the broadcast:
Justices heard oral arguments on two cases involving partial birth abortions. At 10 a.m. the justices heard arguments in Gonzales v. Carhart, et al.. At 11 a.m., they heard Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, et al. The Court will decide the constitutionality of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. It prohibits a doctor from knowingly performing a partial-birth abortion. The act contains an exception for cases in which an abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the mother, but no exception for the health of the mother. Congress made factual findings before passing the act, including that a partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary to preserve the health of the mother.

Priscilla Smith argued for physicians, including Leroy Carhart. Eve Gartner and Therese Stewart argued for Planned Parenthood.

The U.S. Supreme Court does not permit cameras in its proceedings. This video features audio with still picture images of the participants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hopefully Justice Ginsburg's dissenting comments can be the basis for overturning this disgraceful
Edited on Sat Apr-21-07 01:20 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC