Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin is just a little bit too quick for that old plodder Al Gore.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:34 AM
Original message
Sarah Palin is just a little bit too quick for that old plodder Al Gore.
Edited on Thu Dec-10-09 10:38 AM by kpete
That Sarah Palin is just a little bit too quick for that old plodder Al Gore. From her Facebook page:

Former Vice President Gore also claimed today that the scientific community has worked on this issue for 20 years, and therefore it is settled science. Well, the Climategate scandal involves the leading experts in this field, and if Climategate is proof of the larger method used over the past 20 years, then Vice President Gore seriously needs to consider that their findings are flawed, falsified, or inconclusive.

.............................

In truth, the "Climategate" scandal doesn't really exist. TP has put together an essential primer on how the scandal was manufactured. It's just as one might have expected.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/oh-snap-by-digby-that-sarah-palin-is.html

An essential primer on how the scandal was manufactured. It's just as one might have expected.

A Case Of Classic SwiftBoating: How The Right-Wing Noise Machine Manufactured ‘Climategate’


In mid-November, thousands of emails from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit webmail server — a top climate research center in the United Kingdom — were hacked and dumped on a Russian web server. Polluter-funded climate skeptics, along with their allies in conservative media and the Republican Party, sifted through the e-mails, and quickly cherry picked quotes to falsely accuse climate scientists of concocting climate change science out of whole cloth. The skeptics also propelled the story, dubbed “Climategate,” to the cover of the New York Times and newspapers across the globe. According to a Nexis news search, the Climategate story has been reported at least 325 times in the American press alone.

While the hacked e-mails may reveal that scientists might not have nice things to say about climate change deniers at times, they do nothing to change the scientific consensus that carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use are raising temperatures and making oceans more acidic. As the right attempts to use the Climategate story to derail the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference this week, arctic sea ice is still at historically low levels, Australia is still on fire, the northern United Kingdom is still underwater, the world’s glaciers are still disappearing and today NOAA confirmed that not only is it the hottest decade in history, but 2009 was one of the hottest years in history. But how did the right-wing noise machine hijack the debate?

The methods for the right-wing political hit machine were honed during the Clinton years. Columnist and language-guru William Safire, a former aide to actual Watergate crook President Nixon, attached “-gate” to any minor post-Nixon incident as a “rhetorical legerdemain” intended “to establish moral equivalence.” (See phony manufactured scandals “Travelgate,” “Whitewatergate,” etc.) A right-wing echo chamber — including the Rev. Moon-funded Washington Times, the Wall Street Journal editorial page, talk radio, and the constellation of various conservative front groups and think tanks — would then blare the scandal incessantly, regardless of the truth. But the more troubling aspect of this gimmick is the increasing willingness for traditional media outlets, from the Evening News to the Washington Post, to largely reprint unfounded right-wing smears without context or critical reporting.

One of the most successful coups for right-wing hit men was the “SwiftBoat” campaign, a well financed effort orchestrated by lobbyists and Bush allies to smear Sen. John Kerry’s (D-MA) war record. But “Climategate” is no different, with many of the same conservatives actors playing their respective roles:

way more stuff & lots of links for ammo:
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/12/09/climate-gate-timeline/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm always intrigued at how she becomes an instant expert on
just about everything: foreign affairs, war, science, economy...who feeds her her lines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Amazing isn't it
This absolutely stupid woman is an expert on everything. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. the press is just obsessed with her,
it will be a sad day if she runs for President, the press keeps her in the headlines, for what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. That is what flabbergast me...how in the hell can stupid be so
knowledgeable. We should set her up in a lab with all those little wires and buttons and let her give the world all the answers to everything. then we wouldn't need computers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. And they are all over LBN
Very discouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. It ONLY happens because a COMPLICIT MEDIA actively participates in promoting the lies and smears
while downplaying or muting the truth.

Happened to Dan Rather.

Happened to ACORN story, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of Course This Is Astroturfed...
A good part of it is the upcoming Cap and Trade fiasco that is sure to happen in the Senate. If you saw misinformation and lobbyist influence on a bill with healthcare, just wait til this one comes up; and the corporates aren't wasting any time.

For over 30 years, the GOOP and its corporate puppetmasters have tried to discredit climate change to a point where it's a major article of faith. A "good" rushpublican can't believe that man affects the climate as it not only doesn't jive with the fundie rhetoric the party uses to pander to its coven but also gives cover for the corporates who want to pilage and exploit and use government to protect their profits and assets. A nice little arrangement that makes this country one of the few to recognize the obvious problems nearly 200 years of heavy industrialization has done to this planet. It's embarassing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. IDEA
what I posted...why doesn't some one who can photo shop do this, picture her in a room with all the wires etc and the caption "Ask me how to solve everything, I am the Wizard of OZ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC