Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Whitehouse Busts Gonzales for Burying the DOJ Internal Investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 05:44 PM
Original message
Senator Whitehouse Busts Gonzales for Burying the DOJ Internal Investigation
Edited on Fri Apr-20-07 05:49 PM by understandinglife


by emptywheel

Fri Apr 20, 2007 at 10:38:24 AM PDT

There was an important part of the Gonzales hearing yesterday that was kind of confusing, so I wanted to unpack it here. It appears that Senator Whitehouse believes Gonzales tried to bury DOJ's internal investigation into the USA Purge.

Towards the end of the hearing, Whitehouse started schooling Gonzales on the appropriate office to conduct an internal investigation, Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) or Office of the Inspector General (OIG). What appears to have happened is that, as part of his attempt to claim to be trying to get to the bottom of the USA scandal, Gonzales ordered the OPR to conduct an investigation. Then, the OIG started an investigation on its own accord. Only after an acting Chief of Staff (and note--this is Chuck Rosenberg and not Kevin O'Connor, whom Gonzales has since picked to be his real COS) suggested OIG investigate the firings did Gonzales think of encouraging the OIG to do an investigation. But at that point, OIG was already investigating on their own accord. So the question Whitehouse wants to ask is why Gonzales chose OPR and not OIG to conduct the internal investigation.

<clip>

Whitehouse makes it clear that Gonzales himself made the decision to ask OPR--and not OIG--to conduct the investigation.

<clip>

Gonzales makes one more dodge. When Whitehouse asks for assurances that the joint OPR/OIG report be made public, Gonzales retreats to the old recusal stance. He can't make such assurances, he says.

WHITEHOUSE: ... Can we be assured that the results of the OPR/OIG investigation will in fact be made public?

GONZALES: Senator, I think -- as I indicated in response to your earlier question, that I am recused from the oversight of these two investigations. And so, as a technical matter, I'm not sure that's going to be a decision for me to make, quite frankly.

And Mr. McNulty, the deputy attorney general -- I advised to recuse himself. And so Paul...

WHITEHOUSE: Who do you talk to?

GONZALES: Paul Clement, the solicitor general.


That, it seems, is a really good issue we ought to push for--public release of both the OPR and OIG investigation report.


Excellent analysis; important.


IT IS TRIBUNAL TIME IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link to comments at "The Next Hurrah"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Additional comment from Marcy ...
There were several related points

First, that the WH (while gonzales was still Counsel) has made it much easier for WH and DOJ to talk about ongoing criminal investigations.

Second, he asked for an OIG investigation into whether any of the firings was political. Gonzales tried the same tactic--"I think that's an OPR investigation." BUt he also said, havign recused himself, he also couldn't order taht investigation.

I just wanted to lay all this out. At one point, Whitehouse comes out and makes the accusation more directly,

WHITEHOUSE: Now, a suspicious mind would say, "Well, wait a minute. OPR never makes a report." And, more than that, OPR is limited to evaluating the conduct of attorneys within the Department of Justice when they're acting as attorneys.

But I thought it worthwhile to unpack precisely teh accusation Whitehouse is making. It sounds just like Gonzales (and this WH) to try to do a fake investigation like this.



Another gotcha, gone-zo ...


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thank you!
:hi:


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. .
:thumbsup:

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. He had Gonzales cornered.
The moment Whitehouse mentioned the Office of Professional Responsibility I noticed that immediately Gonzales started nodding his head vigorously. It was the kind of "gotcha" moment. He knew he'd been found out. Ratted out by a very wise man. Someone in the know. And the remainder of the encounter was victorious, with Whitehouse exposing the AG.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC