Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BTW, Karzai stole the Afghan election.. no biggie...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:43 PM
Original message
BTW, Karzai stole the Afghan election.. no biggie...
http://www.chris-floyd.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/1850-obama-fires-diplomat-for-urging-fraud-probe-in-afghan-vote.html


Obama Fires Diplomat for Urging Fraud Probe in Afghan Vote
Written by Chris Floyd
Wednesday, 30 September 2009 23:14

The Obama Adminstration has fired a top US diplomat at the UN for the heinous crime of insisting that the manifest and widespread fraud in the recent Afghan elections be vigorously investigated.

Peter Galbraith -- the deputy UN special envoy for electoral matters -- was technically fired by the United Nations, specifically by UN Secretary General Bai ki-Moon. But as the Guardian points out, "the recall of Galbraith would have required the agreement of the Obama administration."

Galbraith clashed with UN and US officials over his insistence that the fraudulent election of putative Afghan President Hamid Karzai be subjected to "a full and robust investigation," the Guardian notes. Galbraith had been particularly critical of a decision by the so-called Afghan Independent Election Commission to reverse an earlier decision to throw out multitudes of obviously fraudulent votes. The reversal came after heavy political pressure from Afghanistan's true masters in Washington.

As the paper notes, the sacking of Galbraith comes hard on the heels of reports that Obama and NATO have decided to keep Karzai in office -- even if the vote probe showed that he won less than 50 percent of the vote, which legally would require a run-off with his opponent, Abdullah Abdullah.

In other words, the White House has decided to bite the bullet and keep the corrupt and ineffectual oil man that George W. Bush installed in office over the conquered land -- no matter what the Afghan voters might want. And Galbraith's continued insistence on actually investigating the vote fraud -- which mirrors almost exactly the manipulations in Iran over which Obama and his war partners shed so many salt tears scant weeks ago -- is now highly inconvenient. And so he is out.

But deep in the Guardian story comes the real money shot:


The exit of Galbraith would appear to further reduce Obama's scope for manoeuvre in Afghanistan at a time when he is facing calls from his military commander, General Stanley McChrystal, for up to 40,000 more soldiers.

One by one, the White House and Pentagon -- whatever their internal disputes, if any -- are closing the doors on any option other than a disastrous and literally murderous escalation of some kind on the "Af-Pak" front. We noted here a few days ago the machinations of the militarists to ensure that the civilian government remains firmly on board the war wagon. Today's action by the White House -- its clear acquiescence in the very public decapitation of a U.S. official pushing for the truth about the puppet regime in Kabul -- was entirely the free choice of the civilian government, and dovetails exactly with the militarist agenda.


..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush stole the election twice.
Nobody investiated that, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. If It Can Happen Here...
it sure as can happen there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. stole it three times
In Texas when he ran for governator there were something like a million votes for GWB against Ann Richards, using e-voting, and no votes for any other candidate on those tickets. But oh noes that could not possibly have been cheating . . . .

Very odd, and consistently as stupid as the republicans can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. we really have no voice
the idea of democracy is an illusion now. It's heartbreaking. They will do what they want to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is perhaps the largest problem with Obama's plan
To think a corrupt government without organic support can be propped up as legit with any number of troops is absurd.

Either this government will be overthrown upon withdrawl or this government will become more corrupt and totalitarian to hold power. Or, we will never withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. We are propping up an illegitimate guy. Like South Viet-Nam. Tough luck ahead. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC