Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin Lauds Obama's Afghanistan Decision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:53 PM
Original message
Palin Lauds Obama's Afghanistan Decision
Sarah Palin is offering rare praise for President Obama following his speech last night in which he vowed to deploy 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan.

"At long last, President Obama decided to give his military commanders much of what they need to accomplish their mission in Afghanistan," Palin wrote on her Facebook page last night.

The 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee expressed gratitude that a president who ran on a platform opposing the surge in Iraq now supports a surge in Afghanistan. She also signaled confidence that a surge in Afghanistan can succeed.

"We now have an opportunity to build a bipartisan consensus in support of a vital national security priority: defeating Al-Qaeda and its violent extremist allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and ensuring that these countries never again serve as bases for terrorist attacks against America and our allies," she wrote.


http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/12/02/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5863327.shtml

-----------------------

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. And that's all you need to know about this plan...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. The plan is to get your panties in a twist by her "agreeing" with Obama...
How much more plain can it be? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. So using the same logic presented by the fan club...
...over the last few weeks, YOU are NOW a Palin Supporter.

Congratulations!
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. OMG bvar222, you are right.That is hilarious! Talk about full circle!
:yourock: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. LOL.
People who exist on SPIN frequently get turned in a full circle.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. We agree on this it seems.
If it's between supporting her or the leftbaggers I see no difference anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe a broken clock ISN'T right twice a day.
:*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. When I break a clock it is never right again...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. yeah when Rove, Cheney, Palin and Mccain are endorsing your efforts you must be doing something
right!:puke: I love the true bipartisanship reflected here.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Lieberdouche too.
Unholy Joe gave his droopy dog thumbs up last night.

And Thom Hartmann just said he's going to debate a Repuke at the beginning of the next hour.... the Repuke is in favor of the escalation, Thom isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Hmmm. Lemmee see. The obvious pattern is the right knows they can
divide the left so easily every time they praise him and agree with him. They are hi-fiving each other as they roll in the aisles laughing at people like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Sorry but they aren't that deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Bull. They are masters at divide and conquer. Pretending it isn't so,
won't make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Ya know, I have a friend in DC at the WH who always says, "the government really isn't that smart,
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 05:52 PM by saracat
neither are the parties. Most of the time crap just happens and others read into it." They have survived three administrations in a high level position and I believe they are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Your friend isn't talking about the repukes who are renowned for their
divisive tactics and daily talking points. It is never a coincidence whenever they spread out in the media, all with the same message. Their message is always coordinated. I thought everybody knew that. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. More Money for More Wars is always a bipartisan effort.
And that's because we have two options when voting: Hawk or Hawk Lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Birds of a feather...? Or, should that be Hawks of feather...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndersDame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Hawks of a feather! I agree and also most say that was pretty clever!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well Gee Whiz!
Sarah approves Obama's Afghan Troop Escalation Decision. All is right with the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. There you go. Bipartisanship.
Now since we have that under our belt, can we ditch it for the rest of the agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. First Smoky Jim Inhofe, now Bible Spice
These are truly frightening developements. Even KKKarl Rove approves. Can Biggus Dickus be next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. If there was any lingering doubt that Obama was right about this one,,
there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm afraid...
very, very afraid.:scared:
I can't believe I actually just read that headline.

Tho' I think it could be that Caribou Barbie is closing in to my breathing space (she'll be in Norman, OK tomorrow-I have to keep my dogs inside, lest she mistake them for wolves and shoot them from her bus).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Anyone Else Feeling Some Serious Buyer's Remorse?? I Will Admit That
I've not been in Obama's corner for many things he's done of late, but THIS ONE just takes the cake!!

Oh WAIT... we CAN eat cake, Marie told us we could! That worked out well for her too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. I was on the fence but not no more.
Anything "Pals with Terrorist" is for, I'm automatically against.

Actually, I don't support this escalation, but I don't question Obama's motives. Not yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hahahahahahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Praise from Caesar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. OY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. they wrote down what she had to say obviously
or else she would have been incohent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. "At long last"
Yeah, the last president should have done it about 7 years ago. I wish this Palin would just go away, she is an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Obama/Palin 2012??
ha ha just kidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Unemployed blogger Sarah Palin agrees with the escalation..
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 01:29 PM by tridim
While completely ignoring the exit plan.

Note that all the wingnuts agreeing with Obama's "plan" don't agree with the most important part, we're leaving in July of 2011. Which is to say, they don't agree with the plan AT ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. we're not leaving in july of 2001..
you can take that to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Have you time-travelled to 2011?
Because otherwise, how do you know this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. have you read gates' statement from today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm shocked; I'd have expected her to say it's not enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. LOL. Centrist Heads Explode all over DU!
And also, good company ya keepin there, don't cha know?

Obama/Palin 2012.



Stop the WARS.
Donate today.

http://www.moveon.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. fuck her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. Well . . . at least the far right wingnuts are happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. They are not happy about the the President's exit plan.
They're simply cherry picking one aspect of the entire plan that they agree with for political purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. TraYter!!1
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 04:47 PM by Swamp Rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. She said it just to f*ck with us. The GOP is laughing at the fractured left
and instigating. They can't wait for 2010/2012, and some of you are too foolish to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
45. Brutal. Palin represents oil and gas which wants that pipeline, regardless of the costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC