6. well if Obama get accomplish what he said in the middle east
thats going to be mission accomplish for the previous administration, remember how many times the story has changed from WMD to Liberation and now to stable democratic nations.....
And had you bothered to write a paragraph to explain what you were upset about (Obama's committment of additional troops to Afghanistan) I would have been very likely to recommend your post.
4. Well, if mission accomplished occurs in the next 20 years
then Bush was brilliant for invading Afghanistan and Iraq.
It will take 100 years of blood and treasure before we can declare MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. That is why we should only use military force as a solution of last resort.
If we "mission accomplish" in Iraq and Afghanistan by 2011, then why not invade Iran and N.K.? A couple years of blood is well worth ending evil dictatorships.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.