|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:31 PM Original message |
meta: anyone think the unrec droids, footstampers and 'snap'pers here are hilarious or tragic ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. :snort: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Bingo!!! I win!!! The Unwec Dwoids Stwike Back at the Unweconstwucted Baddy!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Whatever, dood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I said it wasn't a reply to you. Nice fatty (on the hottie) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. We bemoan the ignorance of the conservatives/rethugs while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. Unrec for the unrec droid comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. They should give you something special for that 3rd paragraph alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. the one about WTF is a 'snap' ? Thanks for noticing /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. auto-unrec for mentioning rec function |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 11:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. fu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. i find you hilarious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. You're unsure if the Men On Film guys were gay?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 11:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I didn't want to get spanked by the commission for the promotion of correctness and prevention of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 11:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Haven't you been banned from here once already? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 01:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. nope, still working on my first one, at least as far as the objects of my comments are concerned /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 01:40 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. or the commission for prevention of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. now that's worse than the Spanish Inquisition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 08:10 AM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Dude, they're gay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. what a shame, I thought ILC was being broad-minded /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. unrec for extreme trainwreckiness nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-01-09 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
15. FAIL. Unrecommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:15 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. 's what I'm talkin bout - hall monitor /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 03:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Scoreboard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Deleted sub-thread |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
18. no watchamean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
19. Could not agree more. I like my politics grown up, even if that's sometimes tougher. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Grown up == invading other countries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Grown up == not reaching for faulty syllogisms at the first opportunity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. OMFG someone who can actually reason and then speak, I'm so pleased to meet you, we're not dead yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 06:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. You two are so supportive of this war, I suggest you go enlist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #50 |
61. yawn /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
21. Crock of shite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 04:01 AM Response to Original message |
24. Rec'd just because of the quality of the rant! (Well, and the character of the unreccers also.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. thank you! I am honored ! /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
30. LMAO.. the only thing blowing at gale force here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. The gail force is the flatulence emitted by those who don't know dick about FoPo and don't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
32. You subscribe to the 'Strict Father' model that George Lakoff discribes so well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. you know, the baseline sentiment is good but the verging into sentimentality sinks it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 07:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. Other people's convictions are 'feelings' and yours are 'fact' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. as long as you're able to differentiate the two - reality is not defined by our beliefs /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
34. Rec for Gale Force comment! :) lololol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. she sure filled my sails ;) /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
35. What an odd rambling post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billh58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
37. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
38. Gee, what a great way to make your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
39. I'm always amazed by the ones who make it to 1000+ posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 03:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. if only those who seek club membership (your 'Mr. democrat' ref) are welcome then you will lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 04:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Really man, what are you doing here? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 04:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. protecting my self-interest - preventing progressive politics from being taken over by know-nothings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Ha, you wouldn't know "progressive" if it bit you on the ass (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
45. I think the drama queens posting "Look at me!" messages complaining about others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. worse yet, here they confirm the worst stereotypes of pantywaist salon liberals /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #47 |
58. um, I think the poster was referring to the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:52 AM Response to Reply #58 |
62. that doesn't mean I have to play along /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
49. There are some very, very stupid people around here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
51. PLEASE ENLIST TO FIGHT THIS WAR YOU SUPPORT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:24 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. after you champ /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. I don't support this war. You are nothing more than a keyboard warrior full of air. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #57 |
64. I should be a big strong man and be forthright and brave the field of honor. evolved lately ?/nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Of course not. You should sit in your mom's basement and pontificate on war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. more "weak male" imagery from the "feminist" contingent - thanks for playing, now free your mind /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-02-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
53. Unrecced, for a sentence containing about 125 words before its verb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:25 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Yes. And how isn't it a general calling out of DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #56 |
63. please don't equate DU with the simplistic doctrine a subset here are trying to force on all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. How about you not do it? And ditch the thesaurus. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. the thesaurus ? was any usage incorrect, or did it just have too many syllables ? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
59. I think those who complain about unrec droids, footstampers and 'snap'pers are hilarious...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-03-09 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
60. a good example of the outcome of a failed education system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC