BecKKK (& probably PALIN's kids) think she & her woman's yapping belong in the kitchen

[UTUSN]

The reference to her kids is about another item in the news, that was headlined, "Palin spends Thanksgiving with her family". Except that the family she spent it with was an aunt in the Midwest. The kids weren't mentioned in the item, so it's not for sure that they were or weren't there. But Levi has said they are growing up without parenting, dressing themselves and cooking their own breakfasts, so roasting a turkey ought to be a snap for them.

**********QUOTE********
http://gawker.com/5413577/glenn-beck-dismisses-palin+beck-2012-because-sarah-belongs-in-the-kitchen?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gawker%2Ffull+%28Gawker%29&utm_content=My+Yahoo

Glenn Beck Dismisses Palin-Beck 2012 Because Sarah Belongs 'in the Kitchen'

.... The Palin-Beck drama began when the former governor of Alaska told Newsmax she considers Beck "a hoot" and would be open to running with him. She repeated the coy "we'll see..." wink-nudge invite on Fox and Friends, prompting the king of televised weeping to dismiss Palin as frivolous, strident, and exceedingly female. ... ....

BECK: I'm just saying, Beck-Palin, I'll consider. But Palin-Beck—can you imagine, can you imagine what an administration with the two of us would be like? What? Come on! She'd be yapping or something, and I'd say, "I'm sorry, why am I hearing your voice? I'm not in the kitchen." I mean, you'd have to live up to the evil conservative stereotypes, you'd have no choice, you'd have to. Look, I talked to the woman about it, I don't even know what she was saying.

Palin has a hair-trigger reaction to sexist slights—see Newsweek Cover Melodrama, The—so I would predict a wingnut feud, but in this case, Lady Alaska's martyr complex is going to conflict with her effusive love of right-wing media. Also, Beck's producers will likely pressure him to make nice. She's way too valuable to them.

Then again, if this most schadenfreude-rich year has taught us anything, it's that the only predictable thing about the Thrilla from Wasilla is her ability to hold grudges, so I'm going to call a 50-50 split on whether she flies into attack mode or sits back, arches an eyebrow, and quietly snubs him, instead. Hooray, now we have something to look forward to for after the holiday!

********UNQUOTE********

[HughMoran]

1. Oh, no

:rofl:

Entertainment Tonight meets politics, AKA

The US is a nation of ass holes.

[dem629]

2. I think the next sentence explains it.

"I mean, you'd have to live up to the evil conservative stereotypes..."

He's alleging here that there's a stereotype of conservative men thinking women belong in the kitchen. So I don't think he's saying HE thinks she belongs in the kitchen.

But what he is doing -- and what just about every conservative I've heard does -- is playing this victim card. They have a persecution complex, always whining about how Republicans get hammered for things Democrats get away with, how "the media" treats them unfairly, how their views are "under assault," etc.

They thrive off of this persecution complex. They bond by acting as though they're under attack. It's pathetic.

I think that's the REAL story in this Beck quote.

[peekaloo]

3. They should form a third party: the Taint Party

find a middle ground somewhere between the teabags and the assholes.

[UTUSN]

4. LOL!1 - Ode to my faithfully stalking UnReKKKer!1

Dear One,

Guess what, not EVERY thread posted is worth EITHER a Rec OR an UnReKKK!1 And I myself said many times during the Great Debate on UnReKKK that I never look at the Greatest Page and regard it mostly as a tool for Visitors, like media types, who don't have the time to delve through the entrails of DU, but how I DO a lot of Rec-ing (obviously, for OTHERS), both for merit and to keep worthy topics from falling through the cracks.

Ah, you DISAPPROVE of thread after thread!1 Woe, WOE is you, YOU!1 Kisses to make your sour woe all better for you --actually, NOT!1