Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Back, and to the left. Back, and to the left. Back, and to the left. (Warning: graphic)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:26 AM
Original message
Back, and to the left. Back, and to the left. Back, and to the left. (Warning: graphic)
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 10:28 AM by HamdenRice
Zapruder film stabilized:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-cri43ttTo

Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
icee2 Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bullet hole in right forehead, blowout in right rear of head. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. definitely a touch forward first.


but then again, the physics are not in dispute and haven't been for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee2 Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What's your explanation for the bullet hole in his forehead?

And the blowout in the back of his head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Since there wasn't "a blowout in the back of his head"

I have no explanation for something that didn't happen. The bullet that hit the upper back of his head and exited his forehead explains why a huge chunk of his upper skull exploded open.




Comment: Jackie told Theodore White (in White's words):

She remembered, as I sat paralyzed, the pink-rose ridges on the inside of the skull, and how from here on down (she made a gesture just above her forhead) "his head was so beautiful. I tried to hold the top of his head down, maybe I could keep it in . . . but I knew he was dead."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee2 Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Denial is the best you can come up with?

Are you aware that even JFK's embalmer noted the entry hole in JFK's forehead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm sure his embalmer did see the exit hole in JFK's forehead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The physics being...
That a bullet, contrary to multiple images of people being blown backwards off their feet when shot, doesn't impart a lot of inertia to its target. It kind of just "slips inside" for lack of a better term, but if it exits the target, a jet stream effect is created that will push the target towards where the bullet came from. So if Kennedy's head went "back and to the left," it indicates the general direction where the bullet came from.

Experiments have been performed on everything from corpses to re-creations of human heads to heavily taped melons (believe it or not), and when "properly" shot so that the jet stream effect is achieved, the targets jerked/were pushed towards the shooter.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. The only thing that can be concluded from this is that Oswald was the ONLY shooter.
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 11:14 AM by cbdo2007
Whether or not he was part of a bigger conspiracy is the real question. Those who are caught up in the shooting itself when the footage clearly shows exactly how the bullets hit are helping to block us from focusing on the conspiracy aspect of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee2 Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sorry. There's no evidence Oswald fired ANY shots that day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC