Could Tony Blair be charged with false statements to parliament?

[ck4829]

Britain's Sunday Telegraph published details of private statements made by senior British military figures claiming plans were in place months before the March 2003 invasion, but were so badly drafted they left troops poorly equipped and ill-prepared for the conflict.

The documents — transcripts of interviews from an internal defense ministry review of the conflict — disclose that some planning for the Iraq war had begun in February 2002. Maj. Gen. Graeme Lamb, then head of Britain's special forces, was quoted as saying he had been "working the war up since early 2002," according to the newspaper.

In July 2002, Blair told lawmakers at a House of Commons committee session that there were no preparations to invade Iraq.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091122/ap_on_re_eu/eu_britain_iraq

I am reading through the UK's perjury act, but I think Blair could potentially be in hot water. Let's just hope their parliament has more of a spine than our congress has.

[Davis_X_Machina]

1. Not if they're made on the floor of the House -- parliamentary immunity.

And probably not elsewhere. Was he under oath?