Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sec. Geithner defends his job, blames economic woes on Bush administration (Not good enough, Tim)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:10 PM
Original message
Sec. Geithner defends his job, blames economic woes on Bush administration (Not good enough, Tim)
From Tony Romm at The Hill's Blog Briefing Room:


November 19, 2009


Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner fiercely battled against the suggestion he step down from his post in light of growing concerns from both the left and right over his leadership.

In a fiery exchange at Thursday's Joint Economic Committee hearing with ranking Republican Kevin Brady (Texas), who suggested that Geithner had "failed" and should reconsider his job, the Treasury secretary asserted that he and his team had made great strides bringing the economy back from "the brink."

"I agree with almost nothing of what you said," replied a heated Geithner, charging President George W. Bush's leadership was to blame for the country's financial woes.

"Again, it's just a basic fact: A year ago, this economy was falling at the rate of 6 percent a year. We were losing between half a million and three-quarters of a million jobs a month," he said, noting those numbers changed when President Barack Obama took office.

That explanation, however, hardly satisfied Brady, who shot back that the country "has lost all confidence in your ability to do the job." He also said Geithner's failure was beginning "to reflect on your president."

Sensing the exchange was about to grow more pointed, Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) informed Brady his time had expired. But Geithner still returned fire, blaming "almost a decade of public neglect," and the economic harm that it wrought on the country, on the Bush administration.

Replied Brady, "Tell all of that to the millions of Americans who no longer have jobs because of your decisions."

A number of lawmakers this week, including Democrats, have questioned whether the Treasury's recovery efforts have prioritized Wall Street at "Main Street's" expense.

"A growing consensus in the caucus ," Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) said on MSNBC on Wednesday, a statement Brady cited during Thursday's hearing.

But Geithner left no doubt about the future of his job.

"If you look at any measure of consumer and investor confidence today, if you look at any measure of the stability and health of the economy ... it is substantially stronger today than when the president of the United States took office," he said. "And that did not happen on its own."






Photo credit: White House / Pete Souza



Rep. Peter DeFazio: "Obama is being failed by his economic team.", November 18, 2009


.....Asked specifically whether Geithner should stay in his job, DeFazio replied: "No.

"Especially if you look back at the AIG scandal," he added, "and Goldman and others who got their bets paid off in full...with taxpayer money through AIG. We channeled the money through them. Geithner would not answer my question when I said, 'Were those naked credit default swaps by Goldman or were they a counter-party?' He would not answer that question."

.....





Yeah, Tim, when you've lost the confidence of the people, you need to be shown the door. That's the way it works out here among the peasants, by the way.


And take your buddy Lawrence Summers with you.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. But.. but .. but if he resigns.. he won't be able to give away any more taxpayer money
to his banker buddies and then what would the rick folk do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. But Obama's Only Had 10 Months
To fire Geithner: what's the holdup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. They have a good point, but I'm not going to take that shit from a republican. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree...Timmy fought back against an asshole and tried to explain the situation.
Sure, I don't give a shit if Geithner leaves, but I agree, I'll be damned if some idiot GOP asshole tries to pull this 'everything should have been fixed already' bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Actually, I celebrate it as a true case of bipartisanship
Both Repukes and Democratic Progressives are reaching the same conclusion -- fire Geithner and Summers. They're good for Wall Street but not for anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It would be real bipartisanship to hear Brady to call out Bush too.
Not sweep him under the rug.

"You're not cleaning up our mess fast enough!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Obama or progressives should force out Geithner on our terms, not the GOP's
The GOP has zero idea what is going wrong, but would wave a victory flag if it looks like they are the ones that forced Geithner out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why would Republican Kevin Brady care about
"your president"?
Ok...I get it. Everybody piles on Geithner to show they care about the economy ( after years of going along with the massive swindling ), making brownie points.
I care not.
Actions always speak louder than words.
I am waiting to see what they DO re" Geithner.
I have already seen what Congress DID to get us in this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've been saying Geithner should be fired since he was first nominated
He and Larry Summers are Wall Street hacks and their policies have benefitted Wall Street without requiring Wall Street to be reformed. All Geithner and Summers are doing is helping Wall Street blow up another bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC