|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:00 PM Original message |
Feinstein Wants to Take California TV Crackdown Nationwide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. good bye plasma screen tvs!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. No, it just means all plasma sets will be 59" and bigger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, well . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. I really don't like her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Nationwide is where such a policy MUST be implemented if it is to have any effect at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. It didn't work that way for cars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. It's a whole lot easier to enforce state fees and restrictions on cars than it would be on TVs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestRick (604 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. I sure am glad I didn't vote for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Because that would offend her corporate masters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. I've got a better idea. Turn the fucking things off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Couldn't agree more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
29. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. I just love DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. A world where people starve and Diane Feinstein is worried about Plasma TVs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Actually I think it is about being for choice, not having the govt limit choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. And Libertarian Underground chimes in. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. And someone chimes in with a label and no other argument. Is being pro-choice libertarian? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Will you be arguing against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. Federal energy standards challenge manufacturers to produce more efficient products. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I don't think most people on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. oops.. we're behind the times.. I watch on my 13" tv on my desk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestRick (604 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. It's easy for those who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. When your "sacrifice" is the difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TransitJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
17. That'll make a hell of an economic stimulus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
18. I support greater energy efficiency standards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. But choice, man -- CHOICE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. gotta rush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
21. This is the same DiFi who wants to open the door to privatizing social security.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC