Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH says no to polygraph test for Sandy Berger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 08:57 AM
Original message
WH says no to polygraph test for Sandy Berger

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20327

White House Mum on Davis’s Call To Give Berger Lie Detector
by John Gizzi


Not convinced that Sandy Berger acted alone in the theft and destruction of top secret documents while on the 9-11 Commission, Rep. Tom Davis (R.-Va.) and seventeen other Republican House members recently called on the Department of Justice to administer a polygraph examination to the one time Clinton National Security Advisor asking him about his admittedly illegal behavior at the National Archives in 2002 and ’03.

But George W. Bush’s Justice Department as well as his own White House have given Davis and the other lawmakers the cold shoulder on administering a lie detector test to Berger, who pled guilty to removing highly classified documents from the National Archives relating to the Clinton Administration’s record on terrorism.

In responding to a January 22 letter from Davis and the Republican lawmakers to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales requesting the polygraph test for Berger, Acting Assistant Attorney General Richard Hertling cites a separate letter to House Committee on Government Reform Chairman Henry Waxman (D.-Cal.) stating that "we believe there are no facts that would justify a polygraph of Mr. Berger at this time." (Hertling’s letters to Waxman and to Davis and the GOP congressmen were both dated February 16).

At this morning’s gaggle (early morning briefing) for White House reporters, I asked Acting Press Secretary Tony Fratto if the President supports Davis’s position that Berger did far more harm to national security than initially realized when he made his guilty plea and should therefore be given a lie detector test.

"I don’t think that question has been put to the President so I don’t know his views on it," Fratto told me, "and it’s really a question you want to leave with the Attorney General at this point on how to deal with it."


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Presumably they don't want to open any doors that might be used against them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Not only due
they not want to open any doors....is Berger passes the polygraph it shoots another hole in their talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Theft and destruction of 9/11 documents? That's news to me,
and now I'll consider the source. But :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They were copies, anyway, not original documents.
This is all a charade to push the "corrupt" label onto Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Copies of handwritten documents
but with handwritten notes in the margins. This is actually more serious than we would like to believe. If the documents weren't important, why did he steal them and hide them?

And what would your opinion be if a Republican administration official had done the same thing?

Whatever Berger's motives, we shouldn't give him a pass just because he's on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. polygraph is useless anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have to agree with the WH on this
Polygraph tests have no scientific basis, and are extremely unreliable. That's why they can't be used in court. Passing or failing such a test means nothing.

The government should not be using these tests anywhere. They force many highly-qualified people out of government work for no good reason, and a real spy can easily learn to fool them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think anybody thought that would go anywhere, but it's enough
of a seed for corporate media to create a long diversion and be fodder for the bullshit talking heads
to feed on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. They'll still be bringing this up in a decade!
The story about Clinton being offered the head of Osama bin Laden on a platter by the Sudan 3 times, only to be turned down, has been debunked many times. But, it doesn't stop Sean Hannity from bringing it up all the time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Theft and destruction of COPIES, they must mean
No self-respecting security archive would EVER let an original walk out of the building.

I'm sure they'll issue a correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sheesh, have to agree with the wh on this one, don't believe them to
be accurate enough, real criminals pass them all the time...they are a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks-this knocks Edwards haircut down a notch on the RW BS ladder
the Oil for food BS is now third
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. and, of course, if he passes the test with flying colors ...
it destroys the WH's point that Sandy Berger did something far worse than Bush's fanaticl henchmen ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC