House backs anti-abortion amendment

[Triana]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives voted on Saturday to tighten a ban against using federal funds to finance abortions under the proposed Democratic healthcare reform legislation.

Opposition Republicans joined forces with anti-abortion Democrats to pass the amendment to the healthcare legislation on a vote of 240-194.

The House approved a sweeping healthcare overhaul on Saturday on a narrow 220-215 vote. The battle over President Barack Obama's top domestic priority now moves to the Senate.

The anti-abortion amendment angered liberal Democrats who support abortion rights, but its passage helped win backing for the legislation from moderate Democrats, many of whom had refused to support the bill without strengthening language that bars using federal subsidies to fund abortions.

"Placing onerous new restrictions on a woman's right to choose sets a terrible precedent and marks a significant step backwards," Democratic Representatives Louise Slaughter and Diana DeGette, co-chairs of the congressional pro-choice caucus, said in a statement.

The amendment offered by Representative Bart Stupak, a Democrat, bans the proposed new government health insurance plan from covering abortions except in cases of rape, incest or where the life of a mother is threatened.

Policies purchased with federal subsidies from private insurers will have the same restrictions and women seeking abortion coverage will have to purchase separate insurance riders with their own money.

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE5A705320091108?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews

[joeycola]

1. It is a dark day in America!

[Skittles]

2. disgusting

and DUers are still celebrating? :puke:

[bluetrain]

3. This is horrifying. I'm astounded that anyone claiming to be a progressive could be celebrating this

atrocity.

[Echo In Light]

5. Decades worth of brainwashing has rendered a populace unable to accurately identify meaning of terms

[no_hypocrisy]

4. IMO, not so much "backing" rather than relinquishing the duty to do the right thing.

During the Constitutional Convention, a significant contingent wanted to free the slaves in the South and of course, this measure was attacked. The Founders were at an impasse and realized they would never establish a federal government without the South and they weren't budging. Pragmatic minds decided to let go of the Slave Provision and revisit it in the future for the sake of building a new government and country. Of course, it was revisited. They call it the Civil War.

[Triana]

6. True. They have NO damn will, spine, nothing. n/t