Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US drafting (another) 'Afghanistan Compact' for Karzai- a promise note that he'll reform his regime

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:32 PM
Original message
US drafting (another) 'Afghanistan Compact' for Karzai- a promise note that he'll reform his regime
Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 02:33 PM by bigtree
11-3-09

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has been quietly working with U.S. allies and Afghan officials on a package of reforms and anti-corruption measures it hopes will boost popular support for President Hamid Karzai and erase the doubts about his legitimacy raised by his fraud-marred re-election.

The success of the so-called "Afghanistan Compact" will hinge on Karzai's willingness to take bold actions, such as cracking down on official corruption, replacing ineffective ministers and surrendering some power to local authorities, which in the past he has resisted or failed to undertake.

"As long as the population views its government as weak or predatory, the Taliban's 'alternative' style of delivering security and some form of justice will continue to have traction," says a U.S. government document that outlines part of the proposed Compact and was obtained by McClatchy.

A previous Afghanistan Compact, concluded in February 2006 between Karzai and international backers, promised to boost security, root out corruption, improve governance and expand economic development. It remains largely unfulfilled.

A U.S. defense official, who requested anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity, was skeptical of the new plan, saying he didn't think Karzai would fulfill the new Compact, which he said "isn't worth the paper it's written on."


read more: http://www.idahostatesman.com/nationalpolitics/story/958934.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Bad puppet!! Bad puppet!! But, I still love you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. how can you tell who's the puppet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's a symbiotic relationship to cling to power. With both sides losing because of it.
Karzai is seen as the puppet of Washington which results in even more recruits for the insurgency.

Washington is seen as the tool of Karzai to prop up his regime which results in even more recruits for the insurgency.

Both tell their people that they're in charge, but blame the other for the catastrophe.

It would be almost comical if it weren't so deadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah that'll work
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. sure
a U.S. generated 'compact' should spark confidence in the Afghan leader among his countryfolk . . . sarc . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC