Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Watch Maher-Arar's testimony. The Appeals Court just ruled he can't sue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 11:51 AM
Original message
Watch Maher-Arar's testimony. The Appeals Court just ruled he can't sue
for being rendered to Syria and tortured. Transcript at link. :hi:


Appeals Court Rules in Maher Arar Case: Innocent Victims of Extraordinary Rendition Cannot Sue in US Courts
Arar-web

On Monday, a federal court of appeals dismissed Canadian citizen Maher Arar’s case against US officials for their role in sending him to Syria to be tortured. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that victims of extraordinary rendition cannot sue Washington for torture suffered overseas, because Congress has not authorized such lawsuits. In 2002, Syrian-born Maher Arar was held in New York on his way back to Canada from a family vacation in Tunisia. A subsequent Canadian public inquiry has shown Arar was held on erroneous advice from Canadian officials who accused him of ties to Islamic militants. US authorities then flew Arar to Syria, where he was imprisoned and tortured for a year. Canadian authorities exonerated Arar in 2007, apologized for their role in his torture, and awarded him a multi-million-dollar settlement.

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/3/appeals_court_rules_in_maher_arar

(Clip is about 13 minutes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R I was livid when I read about the ruling yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's unbelievable. if this happened to him, it can happen to any of us.
They kept him in a grave, basically, for 10 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5.  All part of America's rabid desire to pretend it didn't commit war crimes
as evidenced by referring to torture as "policy differences", by pretending the illegal is legal if a lawyer says so, by allowing the guilty to control the evidence, by hiding evidence of war crimes behind the national security umbrella, and the lack of prosecutions...



:(

and it's been going on for years now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. madfloridian posted a thread about an author who is challenging
that whole "positive thinking" delusional POS. The case of the rebranding of torture is a good example of what that author was talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I read it. A study was done not that long ago - sociology study
that found that America was the only country (in the study) that believed it(the people) could alter reality with positive thinking.

And I agree...change the language to something less harsh and torture suddenly becomes not that bad

Positive thinking translated into and transformed by positive spinning...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Warner Erhardt Nation -- that's scary.
But it's good to know no other nation is afflicted with this mass delusion. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Very scary. My first thought was how easy it is to control someone
who thinks having a positive thought changes their reality. Manipulate their thinking..shape it..frame it...and then tell them just whistle while you work and it will all be better...someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kidnapping is no longer illegal?
And Home Depot is having a sale on duct tape! YeeeeHaaa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Kidnapping is not illegal if the government does it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Read 'Ghost Plane'
Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 01:58 PM by arcadian
Stephen Grey profiles all the high profile cases and acknowledges that there are many more that we didn't hear about. You really get the impression that they didn't care that they didn't have the wrong people, kind of like a cop in some rural backwoods filling his quota by merely handing out tickets to everybody. I think there only goal was to instill fear within the global Muslim community and one way to do that would be to grab completely innocent people and do unspeakable things to them. Then have our joke, complete joke of a justice system cover for them in the name of "fightin' terror". This country is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. The co-equal goal was to instill fear in the US populace.
They didn't care if they had the wrong people. They knew the goatherders and grandfathers and cooks and tourists they picked up were not AQ. Andy Worthington has run it all down. It's sickening, all of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. The National Security State requires a certain conformity of opinion.
If there weren't immunity, who knows? We the People might be able to bring some TRAITORS to justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. We are now at the point were the government can grab anyone
in broad daylight, kidnap them, torture them and publicly refuse them due process when caught red handed. Isn't there a name for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Police State
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. We will remain an international rogue for years to come.
Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 01:56 PM by mmonk
We also won't return to American Constitutional government either for a long time. Too many now have been packed into our court system that support the ideas of imperial presidencies and immunity from law. We also, as was proven with the inaction against the Bush administration, have no party with the conviction and principle required to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. When the lawmakers become lawless
It's only time before the People decide not to adhere to any law the lawmakers make as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. A natural progression. The unthinkable or unsupportable becomes
Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 02:03 PM by mmonk
accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. I guess the guy is supposed to be thankful
he was sent to Syria to be tortured and not sent to a US ally where they boil people alive, like Uzbekistan.


Certainly it wasn’t the only occasion when we came across evidence of people being boiled alive. That was the most extreme form of torture, I suppose, but immersion in boiling liquid of a limb was quite common.

Mutilation of the genitals was common. Suffocation was common, usually by putting a gas mask on people and blocking the air vents until they suffocated. Rape was common, rape with objects, rape with bottles, anal rape, homosexual rape, heterosexual rape, and mutilation of children in front of their parents.

It began with that and became a kind of personal mission for me, I suppose, to do what I could to try to stop this. I spent a great deal of time with my staff gathering evidence on it.

Being a very capricious government, occasionally a victim (of the Uzbek regime) would be released and we’d be able to see them and get medical evidence. More often you’d get letters smuggled out of the gulags and detention centers, evidence from relatives who managed to visit prisoners.

We built up an overwhelming dossier of evidence, and I complained to London about the conduct of our ally in rather strong terms including the photos of the boy being boiled alive.

I received a reply from the British Foreign Office. It said, this is a direct quote, “Dear Ambassador, we are concerned that you are perhaps over-focused on human rights to the detriment of commercial interests.”


SNIP

I didn’t want to make a fool of myself so I sent my deputy, a lady called Karen Moran, to see the CIA head of station and say to him, “My ambassador is worried your intelligence might be coming from torture. Is there anything he’s missing?”

She reported back to me that the CIA head of station said, “Yes, it probably is coming from torture, but we don’t see that as a problem in the context of the war on terror.”

In addition to which I learned that CIA were actually flying people to Uzbekistan in order to be tortured. I should be quite clear that I knew for certain and reported back to London that people were being handed over by the CIA to the Uzbek intelligence services and were being subjected to the most horrible tortures.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2009/102409b.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. The lawyer says this:
Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 02:48 PM by truedelphi
First of all, Maher doesn’t challenge the policy; he challenges what happened to him, being sent to Syria to be tortured. Second of all, it’s the courts role to uphold our rights and to be the check and balance for the executive branch. The second reason was for secrecy purposes. Basically, the court said if state secrets might be at issue—the court didn’t reach whether state secrets were—it was better to have a decision to preclude a remedy in open court rather than having to deal with classified information. It’s an outrage

It really is an outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The government's secrets are more important than our lives.
It's that special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Thanks for posting this.
One of the benefits of not being in SF Bay area is I no longer have KPFA, which I used to listen to every day and it depressed the heck out of me.

But it did keep me informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I don't have teevee or a radio right now
but can stream Amy who keeps me nice and depressed. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. Satan himself wouldn't stoop that low.
America is the definition of evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC