Very few news networks are picking this up, but one of the most insulting things about Orly Taitz efforts to pursue her lawsuit is the typical right wing practice of attacking the character of anyone who disagrees with them. In this case, Orly Taitz argued that anyone who opposes her lawsuit is unpatriotic, and suggested that Judge Carter is a coward who is caving into pressure from the Obama administration. Well, Judge Carter, who won the purple heart, did not take this personal attack quietly:
http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2009/10/29/oc-lawsuit-challenging-obama-birthplace-dismissed/24173/###
Plaintiffs’ request, asking this Court to sweep away the votes of over sixty-nine million Americans with the stroke of a pen and order a new election during which the country would be in a state of turmoil, ignores the Constitution’s processes and separation of powers that were developed by the founders,” Carter wrote in his ruling.
Carter also sharply criticized the conduct of attorney Taitz, calling her actions unethical and possibly illegal.
Taitz said that she would appeal the case. She dismissed Carter’s criticism of her behavior and said she suspects Carter’s ruling was the the result of pressure from the Obama Administration.
“Clearly there was pressure on Judge Carter,” said Taitz, who made a similar claim about a federal judge in Georgia, Clay Land, after he threw out a similar Taitz suit on Sept. 16.* * *
And finally, Carter, a former First Lieutenant in the U.S. Marines and recipient of a Bronze Star and Purple Heart for his combat service in Vietnam, appeared to take umbrage at the plaintiffs’ suggestion that he and federal judges who have dismissed similar lawsuits are unpatriotic.“Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction.
“Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.”###