Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whoopee! The Catholic Church is campaigning against health care reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:09 PM
Original message
Whoopee! The Catholic Church is campaigning against health care reform
--because abortions would be covered, of course.

Mighty shortsighted of them, I'd say, since I presume publicly financed health care would save them a lot, just on mental health treatment for pedophilia alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. How very Christian of them...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Political Beast
Edited on Fri Oct-30-09 06:15 PM by SpiralHawk
Rears its Unholy Reactionary Head to interfere in America...Wonder what the Republicon Homelanders' beloved Object-of-Worship -- Rev. 'Second-Coming-of-Christ' Moon -- has to say about all this...Do you suppose he and Pope Ratzinger have consorted and consulted on these tHORNY matters?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. It Might Be A DUzy
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not to mention it would be a nice influx of cash into the Catholic hospital
system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pathetic. The Catholic Church also campaigns against condoms in even in poor countries.
Shame, shame, shame on the Catholic Church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dschis Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Has the poterntial to cap payments to various hospitals in US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good
To borrow a turn of phrase: It really is quite simple - if you want an abortion, pay for it yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. They're campaigning to take down the whole bill over this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. We don't have a tax system that allows me to check the boxes of what I want my money to pay for.
Abortion is legal. I don't believe in a lot of things my tax money may go to pay for, but if it legal, as abortions are, then that is just how it goes. Until I get that checklist at my next H&R Block tax appointment and I can decide what I want to pay for and what I don't, then I don't see how others can go around demanding such a right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well....
If an abortion is necessary to protect the physical health of the mother (not the bogus "emotional health" claim) then it is a medically necessary procedure. Otherwise it's elective surgery, much like a boob job or nose job. Plastic surgery is legal too; do you think elective plastic surgery procedures should be covered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. wow. This place is insane sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I know. Can you even believe it?
Of course, all of the above is easily said when the speaker is male...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Bogus emotional health?
Bogus? How would you know if someone's emotional status/health is bogus or not?

In regards to plastic surgery, I have no solidly formed opinions because there are all kinds of reasons that someone may have a plastic surgery procedure done. I'm not in a position to judge. For example, a person may have been in an abusive relationship and has had their nose broken and reset several times, yet that nose is still a mess. They are away from their abuser, trying to restart their lives, and every time they look in the mirror, they see that reset nose looking at them, reminding them of their painful past. Technically, having a plastic surgeon take the time to recraft their nose may be labeled "elective," but it makes all the difference in their lives. Who am I to claim their reasoning bogus or the surgery unnecessary? I'm not a doctor. I'm not a psychologist. I'm just someone who respects collective "we" as much as the individual "I."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Or reconstructive surgery after cancer...
plastic surgery, again. I guess it's just frivolous, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. My father had skin cancer on his face. He had reconstructive surgery after his recovery.
He had the area of his face which was affected rebuilt. You'd never even know he had cancer if you weren't told. He looks great, and it was wonderful for his emotional recovery. Can you imagine having skin cancer on your face?

He had a full recovery from that cancer, then had a damaged eye (birth defect that we never knew about until everything went blurry,) and, more recently, a tumor in his intestines. He has hung in there, and partly because he had that self confidence that the plastic surgery gave him. His mind was in the right place and he recovered quickly and without many complications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yup
there's a whole lot about plastic surgery that isn't about starlets and boob jobs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Thank you for sharing that.
I'm really glad things worked out so well for him. Too many people have fallen victim to the conscienceless insurance industry in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy Goosey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Why do you think emotional health claims are bogus?
And why did you put "emotional health" in quotes, as if it is something that is not real?

(I'm not trying to be facetious; I would genuinely like to know what you have to say on this issue, because my position is so different from yours.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. I don't think emotional health in and of itself is bogus
I just don't think it's a valid reason to abort a viable fetus in the 2nd or 3rd trimester. Claiming potential damage to ones' emotional health is cover for "A baby will cramp my style, give me stretch marks, and keep me from partying with the girls. Having to change my lifestyle would make me sad, thereby damaging my emotional health."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Please cite reliable sources for your claims of women's reasons for abortions.
Edited on Sat Oct-31-09 04:20 PM by Kerrytravelers
I'm curious as to what sources you are using. The only place I've heard such claims is not what most would consider a "reliable source." I am also curious why you would regard women as so petty to have a late-term abortion because stretch marks would "cramp their style." But, for the sake of discussion, let's say that women are that petty. Do you think reputable doctors are also that petty? I'm willing to accept that people make personal choices based on parameters that I will never experience. Therefore, I can't make a general statement based on my lack of knowledge and experience in an area. Because of that, I trust the medical profession and the people personally involved to make the choices that are right for them, their situation, their health and their families. I wouldn't want someone dictating a medical decision I had to make without knowing all the facts and without the medical knowledge to counsel me.

To turn a phrase: If you can't trust women with a choice, how can you trust them with a child?




Edited for formatting errors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. insert thumbsup here
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
37. mental health issues are not bogus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. So you would rather pay the lifetime of costs generated by an unwanted child
born to parents too dysfunctional to cope with its needs and too emotionally fragile to give it up. I have worked with people on the bottom fringes of society--criminals, drug addicts, abandoned chronically mentally ill and retarded people, and have seen the lives they and their children often lead. Believe me, abortion is sometimes a much better outcome than the alternatives I have seen play out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy Goosey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. When I can stop my tax dollars from ending up in the hands of defense contractors...
...then I'd be OK with no funding to insurance companies that might cover abortions in some situations.

We can't pick and choose like that - that's not the way the system works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Beyond the matter of personal choice, and of women's rights to control their own bodies,
I see another issue, one that will ultimately impact species survival. Some species, such as rabbits, have natural birth-control systems; a pregnant rabbit will resorb her embryos when in overcrowded conditions. Humans obviously don't do that. Overpopulation is one of the major driving forces threatening the global environment. No modern society has successfully regulated its population unless its women had access to contraception and abortion. Barring some new technological or social advances, I fully believe that we need readily available and cheap contraception and abortion as survival tools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. So a rape victim gets to add the joy of paying for her own abortion
How thoughtful of you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
38. no... it's evil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. If we are fair, they are pushing for no payment for Abortions
Of course the RW wants to appear to have the Church on their side,
they do not mention there are Bishops who support HCR but the Abortion
problem gets the emphasis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. What's their argument? That they don't want their tax dollars paying for abortions?
Oh wait a minute! That's right they don't pay any taxes. Time for the Church to STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Watch their membership dwindle next to nothing.
So what are going to do, Pope Ratzo? Sell your crap on eBay to fund your crap?

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harry_pothead Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. We all know why the catholic preists want more births (hence more kids)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Democrats for Life of America is running a massive PR campaign
claiming 43 Democrats will vote against the bill is they don't specifically add language forbidding taxpayer dollars from funding abortions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bullcrap. Where's your source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Here's your "bullcrap."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/30/priests-urged-to-speak-out-against-health-care/

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Calling Democratic health care bills "seriously deficient on the issues of abortion and conscience," the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is urging priests around the country to speak out against the legislation from the pulpit this Sunday.

The conference - the leadership body of the Catholic Church in the United States - is distributing a flier to churches to insert in their weekly newsletters urging parishioners to contact their senators and representatives to ask them "to fix these bills with the pro-life amendments."

"The bills will have to change or the bishops have pledged to oppose them," the flier reads. "Our nation is at a crossroads."

Bishops are also planning to take out advertisements in diocesan newspapers with a similar message. "Americans would be forced to subsidize abortions through their taxes and health insurance premiums," the ad claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. ..but it is ok for taxpayer money to subsidize religious indoctrination.
Edited on Fri Oct-30-09 10:27 PM by BrklynLiberal
And what about all the services that religious groups take advantage of that are funded by tax payer money?
Religions should not be tax free. Since they are doing political propaganda..let them pay taxes, like the rest of us.
They use the streets, the water, the clean air, the fire departments, the police, the roads....let them all pay their fair share for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek_sabre Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. if nothing else, they're consistent
to be fair, they do support healthcare reform. if the abortion funding was dropped, they'd be back on board no question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Not all of them.
'Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City, Kansas and Bishop Robert W. Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph in Missouri recently warned about a “government socialization of medical services” in a joint pastoral statement. A health care system that “expands the reach of government beyond its competence, would do more harm than good,” they write. Bishop R. Walker Nickless of Sioux City, Iowa wrote in a pastoral statement that the “Catholic Church does not teach that government should directly provide health care” and warned that “any legislation that undermines the vitality of the private sector is suspect.”'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mascarax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Big surprise. Not. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow, that really crystallizes the hierarchies' disconnect
Edited on Fri Oct-30-09 08:22 PM by JerseygirlCT
from the gospel, doesn't it?

Forget those poor and sick - keep those women in their place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy Goosey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. Someone should point out to the Catholic Church that Canada has a lower abortion rate...
Abortions are easier to access in Canada, which of course has universal healthcare, and yet there are fewer abortions per capita. The Church should be pushing for single payer!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wouldn't expect anything less from them!!
Considering that the allowed the pedophillia to go on for decades and protected the criminals...this is right in their ballpark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
34. But of course.....exactly what I would have expected of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
39. Makes about as much sense as them pulling out of the adoption business...
...because gay couples might want to adopt a kid who otherwise could have been aborted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
43. Jesus would burn the Catholic Church to the ground
These sacrilegious cretins hate Jesus. Why did they start a church based on the life of someone they hate. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC