Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghanistan’s Election Runoff: Disaster in the Making?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 12:23 PM
Original message
Afghanistan’s Election Runoff: Disaster in the Making?
Source: Wired

This week’s deadly insurgent attack on a UN guesthouse in Kabul — along with the attack on the Serena Hotel — seemed to have one very specific goal: To disrupt Afghanistan’s upcoming presidential runoff election, which is scheduled for Nov. 7.

After Afghan President Hamid Karzai fell short of the 50 percent required to avoid a runoff, a second round was hastily scheduled. As we noted two weeks ago, that vote was shaping up as logistical train wreck: The Aug. 20 national elections required months of advance planning, and the outcome was still marred by violence and fraud.

The UN is still continuing its electoral support, despite this week’s attacks. But it now looks like the election is shaping up as a serious security challenge. Reporting from Kabul, the Washington Post’s Pamela Constable notes that Afghanistan’s election commission rejected advice from UN officials and announced plans to open more than 6,300 polling stations for the upcoming vote. That announcement surprised international monitors, who recommended that the government open only 5,800 voting centers.

That move raises huge questions about plans to provide security for the additional polling stations. While Afghan officials have said they plan to deploy additional personnel to safeguard voters on election day, it promises to increase the burden on U.S. and NATO security forces.

And more polling stations may mean more opportunities for fraud. Abdullah Abdullah, Karzai’s challenger, has threatened a possible boycott, saying that the Afghan election commission is in the president’s pocket.

more: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/10/afghanistans-election-runoff-disaster-in-the-making/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm going to go out on a limb here and pedict that Karzai willl win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can't have an election
in a war zone.

Forgive my political correctness but when was the first election the US government allowed to happen in Japan in Germany after WW2?

I swear we act like Rome more and more everday, at least Rome didn't have the nerve to put the illusion of an election when they installed a puppet king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC