Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Judge does a SMACKDOWN on Orly Taitz: DENIED!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 01:51 PM
Original message
Another Judge does a SMACKDOWN on Orly Taitz: DENIED!!!
http://washingtonindependent.com/65703/orly-taitz-smacked-down-birther-lawsuit-dismissed

Central District of California Judge David O. Carter has dismissed Barnett et al v. Obama et al, Orly Taitz’s most successful lawsuit — that is, the one that got the furthest through the legal system — demanding proof of the president’s citizenship. The entire decision is here, and it’s devastating to Taitz. Here’s an excerpt of the disposition, with emphasis in the original:


<<<<<from the ruling>>>>

Interpreting the Constitution is a serious and crucial task with which the federal courts of this nation have been entrusted under Article III. However, that very same Constitution puts limits on the reach of the federal courts. One of those limits is that the Constitution defines processes through which the President can be removed from office. The Constitution does not include a role for the Court in that process. Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by We the People‚ sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a great day now if only the IRS could investigate her........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd rather just have the California Bar do their job
Clearly this woman isn't qualified to argue a parking ticket let alone handle a case related to Constitutional Law.

What's worse is her clients were duped into think they had a shot with this so-called 'lawyer'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wonder if FAUX will have her on tonight................
she'll probably be spitting nuts and bots from her animatronic mouth......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. How much taxpayer money is this glory-whore wasting with all these lawsuits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fuck yeah! Now disbar and deport her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. we really have nothing to deport her on
but I'd love to get her banned from the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. How about "extreme douchebaggery" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Line forms to the left for that reason and it's a mightly long line
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. LOL - respecting the Constitution is not unpatriotic
I applaud this judge's ability to get to the essential nub of the issues. What a slap in the face for the conshitatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euphoria12leo Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Orly should pay the $20,000
and STFU. How many more lawsuits does she have lined up? Orly should just stay home and
stop running around the country with these stupid lawsuits.


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not the same judge
still waiting to hear from that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euphoria12leo Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I know Judge Land ordered her to pay
$20,000. I was wondering has she paid up? She also called him corrupt he should file a lawsuit
against her.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC