Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Did Americans Stop Blaming Hoover for the Great Depression?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 07:08 AM
Original message
When Did Americans Stop Blaming Hoover for the Great Depression?
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 07:11 AM by louis c
Answer: NEVER

Although it was the Republican policies in the 1920's (tax cuts for the rich, deregulation of Wall Street and the banks) that caused the Great Depression exactly 80 years ago today, Hoover got all the blame. No one in the 1930's ever blamed the Democrats or FDR. The reason was simple, the Republicans were to blame and the Democrats weren't. Only a simpleton doesn't get that historical fact and only a simpleton wouldn't get that now.

President Obama had it right yesterday in Florida. He was hired to clean up the mess that the Republicans created and now, those same folks who caused this mess are complaining about how the president is handling the mop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Question:
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 07:37 AM by OneTenthofOnePercent
Was it "deregulation" of the stock market or was there none to begin with at that point in America?
I watched a special on crash of the market night on TV and found it all very interesting.

IMO, the current situation came about due to a bipartisan effort that spanned a few administrations leading inevitably to the housing bubble. It really is unfair to point at one group, simply because they was there when the bubble popped... IMO that is a simpleton's view of things. There were a few calls from both sides of the aisles warning about the sub-prime problem & bank regulation and these calls were overwhelmingly met from a loud NO on both sides of the aisle as well. The calls to alarm fell by the wayside and each group continued chipping away at the foundation until W's war was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Well, the war was more like dropping a Volkswagen on the camel's back, but you get he picture.

The big mistake Bushco made was driving debt through the roof so that when Main Street and Wall Street needed a bailout the government was in a pickle to provide it. Had W not ballooned the national debt and weakened the economy, I'm sure the economy could have absorbed the burst housing bubble just in the same way Clinton's economy absorbed the dot.com bubble when it popped.

That's not to say blame should be equally shared either. To deny one party or the other is "to blame" is awfully juvenile, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. WATCHED THE "CRASH" SHOW LAST NIGHT
EERILY SIMILAR TO THE BUSH YEARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Repeal of Glass-Stickle in 1999
with implementation of Graham-Leach.

read that story. clinton signed it into law because it was attached to an appropriations bill. Nearly every Democrat voted against the Amendment in the House ans Senate.

tax cuts for the wealthy-----In 1923 tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans caused the money to be redistributed to the already rich. sound familiar?

Some Democrats, especially the DLC and blue dogs may side with repukes, but the fundamental differences are apparent when you compare their philosophies. The same repuke philosophy that caused the Great Depression caused this latest economic collapse. Dn't be fooled by bull shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. PBS showed "Hoover Landslide" last night. Wonderful program and
for me there was much new information on the man. "American Experience" was on earlier and touched on Hoover and the depression. I believe next week will be a continuation of both excellent programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. THEY HAVE BEEN CONTINUING THOSE PROGRAMS FOR MANY YEARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I watched both PBS programs last evening. very good

Check local PBS schedules, they may be replaying on TV today and tomorrow.

The Crash of 1929 can also be watched via online computer
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/crash/


Browse the entire PBS American Experience series featuring over 200 films via online computer.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/onlineFilms/era/greatdepressionwwii/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. A first for me....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Frustrating to say the least but
the republicans panned FDR's programs the whole time taking advantage of them. Then if you follow a lot of the History Channel's programs you see where the commentators reports that in some of the years after the programs helped, the republicans started to take credit. They said that Hoover had set all these programs, WPA etc and FDR just followed thru on them.

I wonder if ten years from now when Obama and the democrats pull us out of this mess Fox is not bantering the point that bush set it all up, and all Obama did was follow HIS plans. It might not take ten years. They showed a video clip where it said that Bush policies was starting to bring us out of this....don't remember the exact words. But it was giving bush the credit for everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. What the hell does a vacuum clener have to do with feeling blue?
/Average American


Only a slight amount of :sarcasm:, I'm really more serious than sarcastic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. which speaks volumes to the fact that the GOP wants the system to be broken
and yet expect the lowerclasses to pay for it all, while blaming them for the very predicament they caused themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Incredibly true statement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. In the Great Depression you can blame just Republicans not now
It isn't just republicans that can be blamed. President Bush was a disaster but the great recession or the great depression II whatever you want to call it, is a totally bipartisan phenomena.

Without the banking and securities de-regulation of the Reagan/BushI era the cops would still be walking the beat on the banking and securities industry

Without the repeal of Glass Steagal, NAFTA, GATT, and blocking of Brooksly Born's attempt to regulate the derviative market you don't have the conditions for the crash of 2008.

Without the Bush Administration's hands off approach on the few remaining regulations and laws still in place there is no crash.

There has been a 30 year mismanagement of our economy by both parties and trying to pin it all on one political party is dubious.

It will remain to be seen if the President moves to restore pre-1980s America regulatory wise or if he paints over a rotting wall and claims victory on reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The Democrats are "guilty" of following the leader.
But I don't think they conceived or managed the policies of the Bush Administration. I don't accept the "equal blame" charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I do
I blame the Clinton ecomomic team as much as I blame Bush. Of course, the democratic credentials of Alan Greenspan, Larry Summers, Bob Rubin, and Tim Geithner are dubious at best.

Somewhere after the Carter Administration democrats started reaching out to Republican ideological figures who called themselves democrats or moderate republicans to fill important cabinet roles in Defense and the economic sector.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Carter started de-regulation. He got the ball rolling. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Throw him in the ranks of the stupid as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Agreed, (see post #1) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Don't forget Clinton's "looking forward", his consent to the criminality of
previous administrations allowed these parasites to finish the job Clinton was elected to stop.

"Ignore what they say, watch what they do".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Bill Clinton was an economic disaster
If it wasn't for the computer this would have happened in the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. And he went right along with the parasites that killed the "new economy".
I'll never forget the millions that paid the price for his treason.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. It was amazing how quickly
The jobs created by the new economy all ended up in India.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Exactly, the sector was still in its infancy and *poof*...
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 09:23 PM by Greyhound
And these were the jobs that were replacing the jobs lost in manufacturing.

We are so dumb.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. FDR represented a radical break from the policies of Hoover. Obama has not made any radical break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Why do you hate the President
by stating the obvious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Like Hoover, Obama's policies have reinforced existing economic power structures. Now, it
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 12:31 PM by Captain Hilts
might be the way to start, and it might not. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Yep. TARP = Millionaire's dole. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. requested and enacted by Bush folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Approved by the leaders of the democratic party
Including the current President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. To resolve situation created by Bush
and his lovely "ownership society" initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. started by the Clinton Adminstration
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 04:31 PM by AllentownJake
and the repeal of Glass Steagal and refusal to regulate derivatives.

This is a bi-partisan depression...thanks to campaign finances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Voted for and 50% spent by Obama... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Obama is proving to be more Clinton than FDR.

I still hold out some hope after he gets through with Medical Insurance reform. But I suspect that we have seen it happen a second time in a row: elect a Democrat to rollback Reaganism only to see him embrace it instead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Americans have short memories,(collectively)
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 11:02 AM by SoCalDem
and when people who were adults when a particular thing happened, die..well most of the rest of us never learn much about it.

Most people have a high school education (or less), and only the ones who go on to college and who study history when there, or the ones who are self-motivated to read history, know very much about anything.

We have the attention span of a toddler.. One day it's Balloon-Boy, and then we're off on another tangent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. Only the Media Stopped Blaming Hoover, Not the Censored People
Thank you for this thread; it is a relief to find that things are still able to be known, after a generation of extremist corporate Republican media propaganda. My parents believed that Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt were saints, they taught us kids that, and they were right. I read and learned more, after they died, and it only reinforced how great, and brave, they were. NO ONE had any problems identifying Hoover as a conservative, big-business Republican: tax-cutting, deregulating, anti-union, and no programs to help the people. Areas where the homeless lived under makeshift shelters were called "Hoovervilles," newspapers were "Hoover blankets," on and on--everybody used to know all the bitter jokes. Hoover was a conservative Republican with extensive corporate ties, including to banker Charles Dawes, who had been Vice-President under Coolidge. Dawes ran Hoover's version of the "Wall Street bailout," the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and then resigned. Immedialtely after, Dawes's bank received $90,000,000 that was never paid back! Everybody who even followed the news--as you could do then--knew this.

There used to be no problem at all identiying what the cause was, the proble, and the cure. Everybody--historians, newspapers, ordinalry people--correctly identified Hoover as a big-business Republican conservative who was cold and hated "the little people." Great historians, with memories of the time, such as William Leuchtenberg, still tell it correctly. Everybody knew that as soon as the FDR Administration came in with proposals, plans, public works, relief for the poor and unemployed, things improved, and only got worse when Republicans started to fight the New Deal later, around 1937. ONLY after the corporate media was consolidated and turned to rich corporate propaganda, did you suddenly get the bizarre, lying "Hoover was 'REALLY,' 'SECRETLY' a 'progressive,' " and "the New Deal made it 'worse,' " with no evidence, just repitition. There didn't used to be any problem at all knowing the truth; for generations everybody was clear--until the media consolidated and took over all the public forums of society.

The only problem is, Obama is acting like Hoover, not Roosevelt. It will never work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Last year I was on a road trip and we stopped at the Hoover Library in Iowa
For someone raised by parents who, like yours, taught me to worship the Roosevelts (and I still do) it was educational. Hoover wasn't quite the beast I was taught he was - more a victim of his time and caught in a particular way of thinking. After WWII he did help establish UNICEF and CARE so he had moments when he wasn't a total corporate tool (and just think of how working with the U.N. would make right wing heads explode today).

BUT, even at his library they mention that he went to his grave gloating that he had outlived all the New Dealers and he still thought FDR had been wrong about everything he did during the Depression.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. True. And it wasn't really fair to him, though he did spend the '30s trashing FDR. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
36. I still blame him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC