Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stanford Endowment Loss Prompts President to Suspend Smoothing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 05:34 PM
Original message
Stanford Endowment Loss Prompts President to Suspend Smoothing
Stanford Endowment Loss Prompts President to Suspend Smoothing
By Oliver Staley


Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) -- John L. Hennessy, president of Stanford University, is drawing on his 32 years of experience in Silicon Valley to speed up budget cuts, ditching a formula universities use to soften the impact of endowment losses.

Stanford’s endowment fell 27 percent to $12.6 billion in the fiscal year that ended Aug. 31. Hennessy has suspended the school’s so-called smoothing formula, which spreads losses over five years. The university, located near Palo Alto, California, said it dismissed 412, or 3.2 percent, of its non-faculty workers, in the first eight months of 2009, postponed $1.1 billion in construction and will close its 58,500-volume physics library.

Stanford will now reduce the amount it withdraws from the endowment over two years, leading to deep cuts designed to speed the university’s financial recovery, Hennessey said in an interview. Stanford, which has the U.S.’s third-largest university endowment, relied on the fund for 29 percent of its operating budget in fiscal 2009, the school said. As a result, Stanford will recover faster and gain efficiency, he said.

“It is only in those crunch times that we really say, ‘Which things no longer make sense?’” said Hennessy, 57, Stanford’s president since 2000. “That’s a healthy process. Not a painless process, but a healthy process.”

By making steep cuts, Stanford will be able to return to normal hiring and growth sooner, he said. In a typical year, Stanford hires about 110 faculty members, said Lisa Lapin, a Stanford spokeswoman. For the 2010 fiscal year, the school froze about 50 faculty searches. ........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aY7Q_PLwFGoE




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. They could always get rid of Condi Rice
Edited on Mon Oct-26-09 05:46 PM by Solly Mack
but then Stanford seems to like having war criminals around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Their endowment is $12.6 billion?
You'd have to have 32 years of experience in big business to consider yourself so broke you had to cut staff with that kind of money laying around. And all these years, I'd been told that people at Stanford are smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. When you have a construction budget such that
you can postpone $1.1 billion, however, you have to wonder exactly how far $12.6 billion goes.

The point is the large losses it sustained. Now, go back what was it--18 months? When everybody was saying how the private colleges should spend down their endowments. Well, they're down. Let's all party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC