Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KBR North President Accuses Rape Victim Jones of lying in MS Clarion Ledger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeltaLitProf Donating Member (459 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 03:55 AM
Original message
KBR North President Accuses Rape Victim Jones of lying in MS Clarion Ledger
If this guy, William Bodie, really is wrong (and let's make sure he is), we need to give him war he won't believe. A couple extracts from his letter:

An Oct. 12th Clarion-Ledger editorial, "Senate: Cochran, Wicker Votes Wrong," criticized Mississippi's senators and others for voting against a misguided amendment by newly elected Minnesota Sen. Al Franken. It is apparent that the opinion's writer does not have a grasp of the facts, relied on inaccurate and false allegations, and did no due diligence to compile accurate information.

* * *

There have been erroneous and inaccurate reports regarding the Jamie Leigh Jones case.

The assertion that Ms. Jones has been denied her day in court is false. A criminal investigation was conducted and found Jones' claims unsubstantiated. A State Department investigation in Iraq, in which numerous individuals, including Ms. Jones were questioned, found there was no evidence Ms. Jones had been sexually assaulted. Further, the Justice Department pursued a grand jury investigation in Florida in February 2008. After hearing all of the evidence, which included testimony from Ms. Jones as well as the firefighter she alleges sexually assaulted her, the grand jury decided to issue no indictments.

The allegation that Jones was imprisoned in a shipping container is also false. Following her reported alleged assault, for her own safety, Jones was provided with a secure living container, or trailer, similar to that in which other KBR employees live. There, Jones phoned her family and was attended to by a female KBR employee who got her food and clothes and, upon Ms. Jones request, spoke with Jones' family to assure them of her safety. The employee also stayed with her for several hours until the State Department, to whom KBR reported the alleged assault immediately, arrived. Despite claims to the contrary, there were no armed guards outside her room. KBR worked with the State Department to arrange for Jones to leave Iraq and provided a female counselor to escort Ms. Jones home.

To date, two formal investigations have been completed and neither resulted in any liability against Ms. Jones' alleged perpetrators. Despite these findings, Ms. Jones continues to pursue legal action against KBR.

William C. Bodie

President

KBR North American

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20091025/OPINION02/910250305/1007/newsfrnt/Cochran--Wicker-right-on-arbitration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeltaLitProf Donating Member (459 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oof.
I hate to watch this plunge to the bottom of the postings tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't believe that he addresses the central issue.
Which is the employment contract that Ms. Jones signed with KBR. If she was raped as she claims, she has a civil lawsuit against KBR, NOTWITHSTANDING any criminal case that might be brought against her attackers. KBR should not be allowed to have this issue (employee safety) settled in binding arbitration.

Let's all remember the OJ Simpson case. He was found not guilty in criminal court, but was found "substantially liable" in civil court and the civil court jury awarded a large settlement to the plaintiffs.

What the Franken amendment does is to make this the jurisdiction of US civil courts and not subject to binding arbitration (no matter what the employment contract says).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is this what you call "trying the case in the press?" It's not criminal to lie in an OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC