Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Poppy's mouthoff a sign the Connected are about to decloak ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:22 PM
Original message
Is Poppy's mouthoff a sign the Connected are about to decloak ?
You know, the drones who replaced reason with social engineering and empty suggestion-laden codewords like "Connected", "Trust", "Under Control", "Firm", "Leader", "Character", "Strong" and the like? Started in the summer of 1990. When their shit is threatened (the unregulated free market socioeconomic status quo, which is just the Old World Odor of neoliberalism with a particularly ignorant and concomitantly brutal American spin - there's the rapacity but without any hint of culture) they come out of the woodwork and start getting aggressive. Any animal is most dangerous when cornered, and these are not to be ignored. Given their involvement with the intelligence community here and abroad (and its corresponding servitude to the mentioned socioeconomic status quo) be prepared for more disinformation as usual, targeting of visible leaders of progressive movements, attempts at social engineering, particularly by redefining words, and a general appeal to fear and greed.

They like to talk in terms of people needing to be broken. They're projecting their own condition onto others again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. About to?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Glad to see you around SR. About to? go covert since overt isn't working
Edited on Fri Oct-16-09 11:06 PM by dusmcj
The clamfuckers had to hammer the freedom vibe arising from the end of the Cold War and the emancipation of Eastern Europe, which was the outer coating of the fact that the earth's public would no longer have to be enslaved to the economic/warmaking apparatus of the ruling classes, into the ground lest the people take up the idea their brethren applied in Eastern Europe and apply it elsewhere.

How'd they do it ? via covert social engineering intended to turn the public into obedient reticent droids whose first priority was to be respectable, conformist hound dogs with weak egos whose strongest hunger was to be "recognized". Gotta follow the group, right ?

Later on Sonny Boy and Big Dick tried to make it overt but they and their ilk were too ignorant and too greedy to succeed. They trashed the economy, but they didn't succeed in creating an unvarnished police state. (There _is_ a difference between whether the repression has to be covert, or whether the law unabashedly demands it.)

The election results indicate that there is momentum within the public which understands, maybe in many cases subconsciously, but nevertheless, understands what's at stake, and is saying "no paseran".

So the Crawl are back to having to play behind the curtains, certainly more than before. And they've picked this battle as the one to "break" Obama (where "break" means that you have to compromise with people whose platform can't win on objective merit - have to compromise either because you're become internally compromised or because they have some attribute you'll be afraid of enough to do so). On the one hand they're terrified of the precedent that non-free market health care would set for their way of life (parasitism on the labor of others and skimming gain therefrom) and on the other their dicks have goaded them into attacking. They may be ejaculating prematurely.

So what I'm suggesting is a reversion to form as they feel particularly threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think those ruling from the shadows are still afraid the great unwinding is still coming
This message will self destruct in 5...4...<BOOM!>....crap, I HATE short fuses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. it's about time for this canard to surface....
..."Mother and I just get emotional when someone attacks our boy/family..." Then his face breaks and he starts to cry a little.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. it already did in the full remarks
quoted on Rachel - they way they (Maddow and Olberman) attacked Doober, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He doesn't really care that they attack Dubya
He hates it that Jebbie won't ever get a chance to own the White House. Dubya ruined it for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. well, I, Don Canard have surfaced... is that good enough ?
when the Connected get going

they fart a lot, even when they try to hide it. Then they talk about Trust, being Connected and Under Control, and how you should be Firm and Strong and have Character. And expect you to forget how their value set can't win on its own merits and so they tried to swindle you into compromising with them.

They're actually pretty stupid when you think about it. Oh, I forgot, Connected dogma says we're not supposed to think too much. My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Seek immediate psychiatric attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. after you, tool /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. You would think that by now people would have learned...
...to stay away from the brown acid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. brown acid ? Given HW's CIA connections, he probably gets a free supply /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Their entire politics is based on projecting their condition onto others
Sadly, we've allowed them to do it, and bring the world to this ruinous pass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. 1+++ I was thinking how that works recently.
In functional relationships, both participants know that when the other is screwing up, making errors, acting badly, the self, before s/he can address what's goin' on with the other, MUST own what s/he is contributing to the situation that the other can't handle. Once the self deals with itself THEN it is functional to address what the other is doing.

We, of course, are not in a functional relationship, one of the participants is incapable of doing what I outline above and I will let you guess which one it is.

The dysfunctional participants in the current situation project their own flaws onto others, without even thinking about their own bads at all, everything is about what "those evil ________________" without whom everything would be much better.

The functional participants in the current situation receive attacks from the Dysfunctionals and, being the FUNCTIONAL ones, immediately turn their attention onto themselves to assess how what the Dysfunctionals are saying might, in fact, be true and to what degree. This is afterall of the essence to Function, to be engaged in a self-adaptive process that facilitates HOW things WORK. So, Functional types receive criticism and use it to evaluate themselves before addressing Other and then they get trapped in that dynamic, rather than, after some honest self-and-other-evaluation, going against their own nature and saying, in effect, "Your criticism is about YOU, so you need to begin to solve the problem by addressing these issues in yourself."

The problem is assuming that the relationships are Functional when, in fact, they aren't and the burden of the error is significantly greater than 50:50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R. . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. They usually show up just before they need to disappear for a while.
I look forward to whatever will be released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. yes, they are in a dangerous mood and are not adverse to murder


as we all have witnessed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's well past time for another round of revolutions,
just observing historical patterns...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC