Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gun owner?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:58 AM
Original message
Poll question: Gun owner?
Just curious as to how many DUers are gun owners.

Full Disclosure: I own three, and they're all handguns. Horrifically scary, I know :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. 3 shotguns, 2 rifles, 1 pistol
Benelli Super Nova 12 ga, 18" bore
Browning Gold 12 ga
Browning A-5 12 ga
Husqvarna 30-06
Ruger M-77Mk2 300 WinMag
Sig Sauer 229 40 S&W
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Benelli and Sig Sauer
nice choices :-) not that the others aren't...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thank you. I don't like to have junky guns
Had a nearly bad experience with a cheap 1911 clone that made me decide to only buy quality firearms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Two
One hunting rifle
one pistol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. Isn't the new tag on hunting rifles to make them scarier
sniper rifles? I mean you gotta give them a bad name in order to ban them.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
56. I've seen that term, I think it's a term to help sell them too
to the pro gun crowd because if you think of traditional rifle hunting, it's a bit like sniper. You camo yourself to blend into your surroundings, stay still, locate target, assess factors that will affect your shot, adjust for those factors and fire to kill. It's just an animal not a human.

It might help sell them considering how popular the military video games have become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. Kinda surprised that it's fairly even.
I figured non-gunowners would outweigh gunowners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Historical gun polls on DU are roughly 50-50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. DU has been freeped by gun web sites like The high road and ARFCOM
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 11:29 AM by billbuckhead
Only they don't call it freeping, they call it "firing missions', the ketboard commandos these Walter Mitty types are.

The latest Gallup poll show actual Dem gun ownership in the low twenties and independent gun ownership in the high twenties with percentages falling every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Oh, you mean that poll that was funded by an anti-gun org?
Do you EVER get tired of dragging out that dead (and irrelevant) horse to beat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. I'm just comparing a scientific poll with one that's been freeped
"The poll, conducted Oct. 13-16, finds that 4 in 10 Americans report they have a gun in their homes, including 30% who say they personally own a gun and 12% who say another member of their household owns it. These results show essentially no change since this question was last asked in 2000. At that time, 27% of Americans said they personally owned a gun and 14% said another household member owned one.

Certain groups of Americans -- men, older Americans, Midwesterners, Southerners, Republicans, and whites -- are more likely than other groups to say they personally own a gun.

Nearly half of men (47%) report personal ownership, compared with just 13% of women.

Americans aged 18 to 29 are slightly less likely than those who are older to be gun owners. Only one in five 18- to 29-year-olds (21%) say they own a gun, while 32% of 30- to 49-year-olds and 31% of those aged 50 and older report ownership.

Roughly one in three Americans who live in the Midwest (34%) and the South (36%) say they personally own a gun. Ownership is lower among those residing in the East (22%) and the West (23%).

Forty-one percent of Republicans say they own a gun, compared with 27% of independents and 23% of Democrats.

One in three whites (33%) own a gun, while only about one in six nonwhites (18%) do."

<http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/article2844.html>

And here's another study that shows smilar results>

As National Rifle Association Meets in St. Louis, MO, This Week, New Comprehensive Survey Reveals That Gun Ownership Has Declined Dramatically Over Past 35 Years


Contrary to Gun Industry and Gun Lobby Claims, Only 34.5 Percent of U.S. Households Have Guns, Personal Gun Ownership Hits Low of 21.6 Percent

Washington, DC--Contrary to public claims by the gun industry and the gun lobby, firearms ownership has declined dramatically over the past 35 years according to new survey data from the General Social Survey (GSS) released today by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago. Except for the U.S. Census, the GSS is the most frequently analyzed source of information in the social sciences and is the only survey that has tracked the opinions of Americans over an extended period of time. The NORC data comes out the same week that the National Rifle Association (NRA) begins its annual convention this Thursday in St. Louis, MO.

The NORC data shows that during the period 1972 to 2006, the percentage of American households that reported having any guns in the home has dropped nearly 20 percentage points: from a high of 54 percent in 1977 to 34.5 percent in 2006. The data also shows that during the period 1980 to 2006, the percentage of Americans who reported personally owning a gun dropped more than nine percentage points: from a high of 30.7 percent in 1985 to a low during the survey period of 21.6 percent in 2006. Charts for both household gun ownership and personal gun ownership using the NORC findings for the years 1972 to 2006 can be found in a new Violence Policy Center (VPC) analysis, A Shrinking Minority: The Continuing Decline of Gun Ownership in America. The VPC analysis also reveals that contrary to claims by the gun industry and gun lobby that firearms ownership continues to rise and that “nearly half” of all American homes have a gun, the reality, as the new NORC report "Public Attitudes Toward the Regulation of Firearms" concludes, is that “...gun ownership has been declining over the last 35 years and the 9/11 terrorist attacks did not reverse that trend.”

VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann states, “Society is leaving the gun culture behind. Nearly two thirds of American homes are gun free, and more than three quarters of Americans do not personally own a gun. Yet our nation remains hostage to the gun industry’s lethality-at-any-cost mentality as measured by nearly 30,000 gun deaths per year and tens of thousands of additional wounded.”

The VPC analysis notes, “When talking to the news media, gunmakers work to present themselves as a vibrant, growing industry that is an inextricable part of American society.” Yet, over the past decade when talking amongst themselves in industry publications, the issue, as voiced in one gunmaker’s 1998 ad cited in the analysis, is, “It’s not `who your customers will be in five years.’ It’s `will there be any customers left?’” Reasons most commonly cited by the gun industry and gun lobby for the decline in gun ownership include: a lack of interest in guns by youth; the end of military conscription; the decreasing popularity of hunting; land use issues that limit hunting; environmental and zoning issues that force shooting ranges to close and limit new range construction; and, the increase in single-parent homes headed by women."

<http://vpc.org/press/0704norc.htm>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
47. I wouldn't answer that I did to a poll
None of their business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. No, a great deal of us really do own firearms.
Bogus polls aside, firearm ownership is ubiquitous in rural areas, and rural Democrats make up a huge portion of the party. As the party learned in 1994, it's a no-win situation to try and take them away (you'll hand the government back to the Republicans, who will just roll the new law back).

I own several firearms. I kind of have to where I live...the fastest 911 response time out here is about 20 minutes. I have Red Cross first aid training for medical emergencies, and guns for safety emergencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Gun ownership is usually pretty even amongst DU GD-Gun-Poll responders.
Turns out, that whole "Democrats don't own guns" thing
is pretty much BS.

I answered "yes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
62. I'd like to see a breakdown by large city, small city, suburban
area, rurual area, remote area.

I just took a random poll of people I know here in NYC and nobody owns a gun or knows anybody who owns a gun. It's generally considered to be something that is used only by drug dealers, members of organized crime and cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Dispensers of death is all those things are..
They have no purpose in today's society other than to kill innocent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Well I guess all those target manufacturers are wasting their time.
You need to tell the Olympic Committee not to have the pistol competitions anymore also.

I have never shot at anything but targets since coming home from Vietnam. That's fun for me and many like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. That is factually false.
I use mine extensively and have never shot anyone. Paper targets have suffered greatly, however. They can also kill animals and, of course, guilty people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. All right, all right. Leave the flames out of this.
I'm just asking whether or not DUers are gun owners. Please keep your opinions of my gun ownership to yourself, if you're unable to say anything nice. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
41. Someone with a CCW could have changed everything yesterday (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is why gun control is a losing issue for Democrats. There are
too many people who own guns and who oppose gun control. If an issue doesn't motivate at least as many to vote for you as for the other guy it's a losing issue. A woman's right to choose is pretty much a 50/50. The Iraq war is 60/30.

Yes, I think there should be reasonable restrictions and oversight on who owns and how they buy but it shouldn't be a platform plank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
73. Good Point
And keep in mind that one would suppose that DUers represent a more leftward drift of the Democratic Party. So if a pack of flaming liberals (like me, owner of two rifles and a shotgun) are so divided over gun ownership, you can bet that the tilt goes pretty hard to the right when you get off this message board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
88. Bullshit.
There are varying numbers, but far closer to 60% of Americans identify themselves as pro-choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. Yeah, but it's a real 'get out the vote' issue for the fundies, so
the vote totals are more like 50/50. It's voters I'm concerned with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. We did this already. It's about 50/50 here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. No. And I never will. If I had to kill animals to eat, I would
never eat meat. That would be the only legitimate reason for me to own a gun. If we lived in a society which provided complete protection, we would not need guns to defend ourselves, but I am not about to participate in the madness of purchasing a gun to 'protect' myself and my property. We need to change the violence first. We can't obliterate madness, but we can certainly alter the sordid living conditions which promote crime, and we can alter the gun laws which also promote crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. Do you eat meat now?.........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. Rarely. (not rare meat though!) And I'm thinking about giving
it up entirely, the more I find out about the hideous conditions of the slaughter houses, chicken farms, pesticides, hormones and antibiotics etc added to our food supply, in addition to the fact that I would not eat meat if I had to kill it myself... a bit hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. "...provided complete protection..."
I don't want to live in a society that provides complete protection. The only way to do that is to lock us all up. Complete safety is not possible and we cannot rely on the state to protect us in every situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
53. "IF we lived in a society which provided complete protection"...
is the complete quote. Why does it have to be State or National Protection? How about community by community? I understand the dilemna, and I don't propose to have the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
80. No society...
can provice complete protection. Depending on how you want to spin it, that is either a Utopian fantasy or a Draconian nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #80
87. Obviously I much prefer the Utopian fantasy; this administration
prefers the Machiavellian nightmare which they label "Reality."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. Not me specifically but my husband owns several..
and my son got his first hunting rifle for Christmas this year.
They both enjoy hunting and trap and target shooting.
mryouthere has three rifles, two shotguns, a 9mm and a 38. Don't ask me makes or models because I don't know anything about that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. it's not tied any more
plus I have a sword, a bow, some knives, and a variety of martial arts training (preferring Shuai Chiao).

On the other hand, I am a vegetarian and see violence as a last refuge (and the first response of the moranic). Most fights can be avoided, disarmed, or talked down. As much as I hate to admit it though, our cultural cowboy mentality likes to escalate things, and guns help that happen (although I blame the idiot more than the tool used).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. 50+.......................nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Man_in_the_Moon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. Own guns? bah I make em -NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
51. I've made a few zip guns
It's pretty easy. $10 in a hardware store and you can get the stuff to make a .22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murloc Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Isn't that illegal?
I'm sure you did nothing ill with it...but Im not sure you should advertise such at a national BBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Man_in_the_Moon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:35 PM
Original message
As long as...
you dont violate the NFA of 34 (or the FOPA of 86), by creating a Shortbarreled rifle, Shortbarreled Shotgun, Machine Gun (very hard to do today see FOPA of '86), Destructive Device, or "Any Other Weapon" (which the classic 'zip gun' falls into), without first paying your creation tax ($200) for those items, and having your paperwork in hand (wait 2-6 Months)...

Anyone not specifically prohibited from owning a firearm (ala felony, domestic restraining order, etc) may build their own handgun, Rifle, or Shotgun for their own personal use. Provided of course that it is legal within their state or locality. If it is not a 'NFA' weapon, you dont even have to tell the ATF about it.

But I skip most of that by Holding a SOT-2 (Special (occupation) Taxpayer - class 2).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murloc Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
72. interesting and txs....i had no idea (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
76. That was 40 years ago, pre GCA68
Making a gun is not illegal. People make them all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. oops
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 11:13 AM by unpossibles
double post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
24. This should be clarified as fire arms as some DUrs could be antique gun collectors
...in which the guns can't be fired, or they have a collection of air pistols or paint-ball style guns which are not necessarily intended to be lethal. The real issue is ownership of fire with the potential for intentional or accidental killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. It's a good point — one of my three is an old .45 Colt with a fairly low serial number — but...
I think most DUers are smart enough to know what I mean with the poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
50. I've never known an owner of antique arms ...
who didn't have a more modern gun or two.

What's defined as antique in the gun trade? 100 years old? Pre-1898 only? It's something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SacredCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
25. I own many firearms of all types....
6 handguns, 3 shotguns, 5 rifles, 1 pellet gun.

Except for the pellet gun, I haven't fired any of them in probably 3 years. Many of them were handed down to me by my grandfather and/or father, including the 3 Colt pistols which I will never part with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yep. got 8. I'm clearly a mass-murderer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
28. There was a very similar poll a couple-3 weeks ago
it was dead even then, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
31. Here it is:
Centerfire handguns:
**Smith Wesson 686 Plus, 4" 0.357 magnum full-size revolver
**S.W. 952, dedicated target automatic pistol, 9mm Luger, 5".
**Beretta 84F "Cheetah", compact defensive pistol, nickle plated with walnut grips, 13-rd. magazines, 0.380 caliber.

0.22 long rifle handguns:
**Ruger Mark III with 6.5" fluted barrel. Stainless steel with fiber optic sights and target crown. Cocobolo checkered grips. Unbelieveably accurate.
**Ruger Super Single Six stainless with 6.5" barrel and fiber optic sights. Rubber Pachmayer gips. Cowboy type single action.
**S.W. 617 full size revolver, 4" 10-shot. Easy to clean.

Rifles & carbines:
**Marlin 1894C 0.357 mag. lever cowboy action with walnut checkered stocks.
**Remmington 504 target grade 0.22 with with cut-checkered fluted walnut stock and two support posts in the stock, free-floating barrel, Mauser extraction, target grade trigger and heavy barrel, 40mm dusk-to-dawn scope. Can hit a silver dollar at 100 yards consistently.
**Winchester 9422 Legend 0.22LR/L/S with 20" barrel, pistol grip fluted walnut stocks and aperture sights. Lever cowboy action.
**Ruger 10/22 Deluxe Sporter. 0.22LR. Free floating 18" barrel, Walnut checkered stock, fiber optic sights. Automatic with patented 10-round rotary magazines. I never use it because it is such a bee-atch to clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. How can you support a guy who lied about being a pro baseball player?
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 11:41 AM by billbuckhead
Because this liar is the only "RBKA" Presidential candidate in the Democratic party?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. What are you talking about?
Baseball what?

RKBA Democrats that I know about:
me
My boss the D.A.
Gov. Strickland (OH)
A.G. Dann (OH)
Gov. Richardson (NM)
The governor of Montana (forgot his name)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Bill Richardson is such a bad liar, he said he was a pro baseball player
They have records of such things and he was caught.

RBKA Dems? You forgot the most famous, ZELL MILLER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Sorry, I don't believe you.
I have heard such nasty things about Richardson on this website that it seems like some folks will say anything and expect me to believe it.

We all know about Zell Miller. So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. It's true. Here's the CBS story on it:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/11/25/politics/main1075650.shtml

That said, I find this a pretty poor reason to not support a candidate — especially without looking at the whole candidate, and not just one incident. If I can paint a picture of a candidate given only one incident in their lives, then every candidate is a liar, and even much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Maybe resume padding. Maybe an honest mistake.
Either way, he didn't inhale and he didn't have sexual relations with that woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Man_in_the_Moon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Zell Aint the most famous RKBA Democrat that would be...
John Dingell.

What created the phrase 'Jack booted thugs' for the NRA to describe Poppybushie's use of the ATF.

I hope he is enough of a Democrat for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. Zell is far more famous cause of wanting to duel Chris Matthews
Dingell is a corporate hack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Man_in_the_Moon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. Ouch, John Dingell is a corporate hack?- wow -NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #46
75. Add Gov. Howard Dean to that list. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
33. Here is the recent past poll about 50 - 50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. 393 gun owning votes out 102,972 Duer's? YOUR POLL IS a HOAX
With the known Astroturf problem of gun "enthusiast" web sites going on "firing missions" to freep all gun discussions on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yeah, all those people with nothing to do but watch DU for a gun poll.
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 11:52 AM by karlrschneider
They sure are dedicated.
:eyes:

by the way, the 102,000 figure includes every single person who ever registered. There are about 3000 active DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Every poll done on this issue comes out to about the same percentage
There really isn't nearly as many posters on DU as the number of user registrations, which includes non-active accounts and people who've been tombstoned. Then there's the fact that a poll about gun ownership isn't of interest to many people who are neutral on the issue. Even still this poll is no more accurate than any other internet poll. They are informational but not scientific by any means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Several flaws with your premise
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 11:55 AM by SteppingRazor
1) There are not 102,972 active DUers. That's just how many people have signed up (including the tombstoned and other nonactive DUers) since the site's inception.

2) Other than your claims I haven't seen any evidence of this poll being freeped.

3) Actually, even if that 102k was an accurate number of active DUers, a poll that included more than 700 of them on a purely random basis would actually be a scientifically acceptable sample size (I realize DU polls are not random, of course. I'm just pointing out that the small number is actually legitimate, although the methodology is questionable.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
71. Only 382 non-gun-owners out of 102,972 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. 393 gun owning votes out of 102,972. YOUR POLL IS A HOAX!
It's well know now that the "high road.com" , ARFCOM and other gun websites as well as neoCON websites have "firing missions" to freep any DU discussions about guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. By whom?
I love your use of the passive voice here. "It's well known..."

Oh really? I mean, it can't be that well known if the rest of us haven't heard of this and, moreover, haven't even heard of these sites. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
78. Well do some investigating about ARFCOM, "the high road"
Why would gun websites be very different than Freerepublic? It's many of the same people, same failed theories and same propaganda techniques. Instead of freeping, it's firing. Go surf the Gungeon for awhile and tell me it's not the most conservative forum on DU about other issues than guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #45
84. Here's a link to them doing it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. Thanks for the link Bill. You have increased their membership by one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
66. Christ, Bill, its a DU poll,. no one said it was representative, get a grip.

and stop being so paranoid. Its not there aren't plenty of anti-folks who rally to these types of polls.

You don't like the poll because it works against you.

There was no hoax about the poll even if some disingenuous people voted on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. The gun lobby and it's minions use all kind of lies to puff up it's influence
This bogus freeped poll is just one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. The gun lobby and it's minions use all kind of lies to puff up it's influence
This bogus freeped poll is just one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. As if you and your side doesn't --- tsk tsk.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
74. Paranoid much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
42. this poll has been done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Thanks for pointing out your poll, Nightwatcher!
Someone else already did, above, with a screenshot. Of course, I didn't realize this had been done a couple weeks ago.

In any case, it's somewhat informative, but I think the vast majority of non-gunowners probably wouldn't even participate in these polls, leading me to believe that the actual percentage of gunowning DUers is far under 50 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
54. I've owned guns for over 40 years.
Have 5 now, but 3 were inherited when my father passed away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
58. My husband's a collector
and a Republican :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
60. Five shotguns, two pistols.
I'd have more if I could afford them, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
61. No guns
in my household.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
63. Federally licensed collector of curios and relics
I share my house with known convicted felines. Here is the hardware component of my retirement savings plan:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #63
81. What caliber is the cat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Blues Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
65. Does a civil war era musket count?
Needless to say, there is no ammunition for it, much less stored with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. It counts as an antique firearm
No background check, no waiting period, can be sold by mail order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
77. I Don't Any Guns.... but This Goes Much Deeper Than Gun Ownership
IMO. America needs to find it's way and get on with some real healing. And I won't say it's ALL the fault of our current leaders, but I will say LEADERS must lead, and what we've gotten of late is only violence!

When we as people keep getting attacked by saying we're UN-PATRIOTIC because we are against a WAR, there is some serious GUIDANCE issues that need to be addressed. And they can't be addressed by SOUND BITES!!!

And not to be too sarcastic... but it's going to take some HARD WORK! Actual hard work and not the "spin" that we usually get about all of this stuff!

America hasn't been a place I've recognized for a very long time. Sure, I'm a BOOMER.... but ask any of my kids or grandkids and they will tell you that I'M the one in the family who makes the BEST effort to stay informed and also to relate to THEIR issues too!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
79. 2 rifles, 2 pistols, and a shotgun.
SKS, AK, 1911, Glock 17, and a Saiga-12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
82. Sorry, I might have skewed your poll
I come from a country that BANS gun ownership unless you're a hunter or a registered sport gun club member.

How I haven't been murdered in my bed with all those criminals carrying illegal guns, I can't tell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
83. and never will
I am 45 years old and have never even fired a gun - and probably never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
85. Yes several and I suppose I'll be buying several more here sooner rather than later
judging by the political discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
89. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
91. I don't own any guns but I thought about getting one a year ago
I'm not really anti gun I just choose not to own one. I do support common sense gun control laws. I think if Virginia had better laws Cho would have never been able to purchase guns so easily and these kids wouldn't have been shot up. Selling guns to someone who is stalking women and has been in a mental hospital should not be able to purchase a firearm. That's just common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC