Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Hinckley seeking longer furloughs, possible eventual release..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 09:53 AM
Original message
John Hinckley seeking longer furloughs, possible eventual release..
why the special privileges for this guy?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/16/AR2007041601738.html

John W. Hinckley Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan and three other men in 1981, wants to take another step toward what could be his eventual release from St. Elizabeths, the public psychiatric hospital in the District where he has been held since being found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Hinckley, who has visited his parents in Virginia several times in the past year, is asking a federal judge to allow longer visits of two to four weeks and to permit his brother and sister to join their mother and father as "responsible persons" in their brother's case.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman began hearing testimony yesterday on whether to give Hinckley expanded freedom, and from the start, it was clear that the judge is also considering the long-range future.

Hinckley is 51, and his mother and father are advancing in age; his father is also in declining health. The judge and the prosecutors who have sought to limit Hinckley's freedom have expressed concern about what will happen once his parents are no longer able to host him on visits away from St. Elizabeths.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Hinckley's are family friends of Bushes, but the kid missed
so Papa Bush was only able to take over behind the scenes.

I guess they're giving him some slack for trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. He was not convicted of the crime.
He was found not guilty (or was it innocent, I forget) by reason of insanity. So he can technically be freed if he is ever found to be free of mental illness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC