Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UNDER OATH - Sampson Tells Congress That - Gonzales LIED (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 09:36 PM
Original message
UNDER OATH - Sampson Tells Congress That - Gonzales LIED (NYT)
Edited on Mon Apr-16-07 10:20 PM by kpete
April 17, 2007
Ex-Aide Says Gonzales Discussed Firings
By DAVID JOHNSTON

.............

The former top aide to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales has told Congressional investigators that Mr. Gonzales was “inaccurate,” or “at least not complete” in asserting that he had no role in the deliberations about individual United States attorneys who were later dismissed, a Democratic senator said Monday.

The statements by D. Kyle Sampson, the former chief of staff to Mr. Gonzales, during an interview with investigators on Sunday, were made public as the Senate Judiciary Committee postponed a hearing that had been scheduled for Tuesday in which Mr. Gonzales was to appear to defend his actions in the dismissals.

...........

In his interview, Mr. Sampson said under oath that Mr. Gonzales took part in discussions last fall about David C. Iglesias, who was removed as the United States attorney in New Mexico, as well as in a June 2006 meeting that addressed concerns about Carol C. Lam, the United States attorney ousted from her job in San Diego, said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York. Mr. Sampson made similar statements in public testimony to the Judiciary Committee on March 29, but appeared to offer more specifics in the interview.

Mr. Schumer, who has led the Senate inquiry into the Justice Department’s ouster of eight federal prosecutors, said that Mr. Sampson’s testimony raised new questions about the accuracy of Mr. Gonzales’s previous statements, most recently in testimony released Sunday in advance of the Senate hearing, that he had not taken part in deliberations about individual prosecutors designated for removal.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/17/washington/17attorneys.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. He is so nailed! Why doesn't he just resign already? k(pete)nr! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nailed is right
I just hope he takes Rove with him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lied? Not lied?
Same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Mr. Gonzales, did you participate in deliberations regarding planned dismissals
of US Attorneys? Yes or No"

Gonzo: "Well, Senator, blah blah blah... blah... "

Schumer: "Yes or No, Mr. Gonzales."

Gonzo: "Blah, blah, blah..."

Schumer: "Yes or No, Mr. Gonzales!"

Gonzo (to attorney): "whisper, whisper, whisper"

Gonzo: "I take the 5th, Senator."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC