|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:03 PM Original message |
BREAKING: Crack found in containment structure of Crystal River nuke plant in FL: no imminent danger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mu2driver (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. The void is just a small area where the original concrete didn't fill in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I shit you not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mu2driver (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. A pound! Seriously, it's like they drilled into a hunk of swiss cheese and found...a hole! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. 1/2 inch crack in a structure designed to contained massive doses of radiation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Actually the containment structure doesn't "contain" anything normally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Oh, I read it as a 1/2 inch gap all the way through the wall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I can see how you'd read it that way--they weren't clear enough in the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. That's troubling though because they should have found this during pre-commissioning inspections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I'm assuming they can use sonar or something like that to measure the density of the concrete? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mu2driver (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 06:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. Doug, the concrete has plenty of reinforcement. If you insisted on 100% void-free concrete in every |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. Safety backups are supposed to actually work, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. Upon first read I thought "crack" as in cocaine.... Must read more slowly..lol...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Crack had a meaning before cocaine you know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Haha, just trying to keep up....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. I thought the same thing! Heh! I was concerned that the employees were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazzgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. LOL! I thought crack cocaine too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Me too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Definitely a sign of our times...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
33. I did the same thing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's a crack house now?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. This leaves me a little worried... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I'm pro nuke and an engineer - it's not cool but the reactor is down right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
12. Crack or Nuke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. Define "imminent" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Imminent means "run Forrest run"...what do you THINK it means.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. It always amuses me how many hyper-literal people we have on this site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. If you understood "imminent" then don't be an ass by asking what it means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Here's another clue - I wasn't actually asking for a definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. "Define imminent" isn't asking me to define imminent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 06:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. It is a common conversational device intended to convey disbelief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Perhaps a sarcasm smiley might have been in order then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Per Webster... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Just as I said.. it means "run Forrest run!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
23. Nuclear Crack!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
26. Waiting for DU's small and rabidly pro-nuke contingent to enter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. FYI: The OP is pro nuke. Still is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Perhaps, but I have not noticed you to be a part of the nasty, rude, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-08-09 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
29. At least the GOOGLE ads were on target with my "interests" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC