Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colin Powell did get one thing right: if you're going to do something, don't hold back.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:52 AM
Original message
Colin Powell did get one thing right: if you're going to do something, don't hold back.
If we are going to stay in Afghanistan, it's time to enact a full draft of everyone between 18 and 35, college students or not, male and female. If you draft a nursing mother, give her a State side assignment and send someone else over. If it's worth sending people to die, then send everyone. If we're not willing to make that commitment, maybe Afghanistan really isn't that important to our national security after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. not to mention that the first to go should be the families of those who insist on this, those who
vote for it, and those who openly and wholeheartedly support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. We should not punish people for their opinion...
Just make the draft as broad as possible and see if they change their mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. "punishing people for their opinions"?? their OPINIONS are getting people killed in large
numbers, and draining our national treasury. we should give them medals, maybe? thoughts and opinions have consequences--and should be borne by those who have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. If it is critical to our national survival every parent should be proud to bury a child or two.
I agree 100% with this.

Though I think anyone wanting to note their approval of a war require they fill out a enlistment form. Any age should be able to apply. The old can die for their country, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maglatinavi Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Powell
He certainly held back when he lied at the UN and said the there were wmd in Iraq. What a buffon!!! He deserves to be H2O boarded...:puke: :puke: :puke: :mad: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. hell, why don't we just go there kill every-fuckin'-one of them?
god will know his own, and all that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. But..but...Canada will become overpopulated with refugees swearing they love hockey. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. That only works when there is an army to fight and infrastructure to knock down.
You need to implement the "overwhelming force" doctrine from the beginning. That window of opportunity has passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Strawman nonsense.
We could easily expand the forces in Afghanistan by 40,000 with manpower to spare by drawing down 80,000 from Iraq.

sometimes I think there is a troll infestation here trying to create the semblance of a 'movement' against being there, just so the Republicans can say "it's all Obama's fault" next time Al Queda attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The point is, if it's worth risking the lives of those who signed up,
why should the rest of us be off the hook?

To me, it makes sense to maintain armed forces large enough to deter a sneak attack, but the main function should be to serve as a skeleton to expand as needed if we are in danger. Look where the American Armed forces were in 1938 vs those of Japan and Germany. We won with a citizen army trained by a relatively small number of professional military men. Maintaining a volunteer force to be used in brush wars that are out-of-sight, out-of-mind for most Americans is a step to Empire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC