Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meet The Senators Who Voted Against The Franken Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:25 AM
Original message
Meet The Senators Who Voted Against The Franken Amendment
From Jason Linkins at Huffpost:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/meet-the-senators-who-vot_n_312976.html

I think that all homo sapiens can understand how the mere thought of an organization that receives government money through contract mechanisms being tangentially involved in setting up a fake tax shelter for a fake pimp and his fake prostitution ring of fake prostitutes can justifiably lead to lawmakers going absolutely cross-eyed with white-hot, impotent rage. But what happens when a similarly taxpayer-endowed contractor attempts to cover up employee-on-employee gang rape by locking up the victim in a shipping container without food and water and threatening her with reprisals if she report the incident? Somehow, it doesn't engender the same level of anger!

Credit new Senator Al Franken however, for introducing an amendment to the Defense Appropriations bill that would punish contractors if they "restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court." You'd think that this would be a no-brainer, actually, but that didn't stop Jeff Sessions from labeling Franken's effort a "political attack directed at Halliburton." Franken, of course, pointed out that his amendment would apply broadly, to all contractors, because otherwise, 'twould be a bill of attainder, right? Right?

Franken's amendment ended up passing, 68-30. Here's a list of the Senators who showed broad support for Roman Polanski by voting against it:

Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

ADDENDUM: It's been pointed out to me that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce lobbied against the Franken amendment as well:

Republicans point out that the amendment was opposed by a host of business interests, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and applies to a wide range of companies, including IBM and Boeing.

I guess we must cover up crimes like rape in order to save capitalism.


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/meet-the-senators-who-vot_n_312976.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. One notices immediately that they are all white, male, and Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Would the Franken ammendment apply ex-post facto?
Meaning, would it be used on events that happened before the bill was signed?
Or would the amendment only apply to future cases taken to court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I had the same question and don't know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. We must cover up rape in order to save Campaign donations...
Capitalism is old enough and big enough to take care of itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, we know that Kyl wouldn't need such a right...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Like grandstanding on ACORN while big defense contractors CONVICTED of fraud
still get government contracts. Even contractors that have paid penalty fees for fraud that exceed the 15-year budget for ACORN.

Hounded, entrapped, accused of fraud = DEFUND ACORN NOW!
Convicted of fraud, millions paid in penalties = Let's give them more business!

I mean golly, if they voted to deprive those military contractors who forbid employees to press charges for assault, they might have to defund other contractors who have been convicted of murder or those who have electrocuted our soldiers in their showers. Can't do that, now, can we? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Won't Thanksgiving be fun?
"Grampa, if I wanted to serve the country and I couldn't get into the military, and I went to work for Halliburton or KBR or some other defense contractor, and my fellow employees locked me in a storage container for several days and took turns gang raping me, why don't you think those bad, bad men should have to face a trial? And why wouldn't the company lose its contract? Why, Grampa? Why?"

A shiny nickel to the first senatorial granddaughter who buttonholes her grandfather at the family Thanksgiving with that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. A roll call of corruption. These are some of the worst. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm happy to see that neither of my senators
is on this list. Apparently Lisa Murkowski's status as a woman trumped her status as a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robyn66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh Senator Gregg I'm so proud you are my Senator!
Asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC