Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Up to 250 public schools to be turned over to outside bidders? Called a hostile takeover.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 10:55 PM
Original message
Up to 250 public schools to be turned over to outside bidders? Called a hostile takeover.
Edited on Tue Oct-06-09 11:03 PM by madfloridian
Up to 250 public schools in CA will apparently be turned over to outside bidders, 12 right away, more to come later. More on that below.

But first here are the words of one teacher in the Los Angeles Public school system. It involves how groups are formed by corporations, called "grassroots" groups, but in effect may be astroturf. In this case it involves Green Dot charter schools.

LAUSD, Green Dot, and the voice of a public school teacher.

First from the blogger:

The corporate charter school movement is getting ready to rear it's ugliest face as LAUSD prepares to action off 250 schools (with part of this process headed by former Broad Resident Parker Hudnut). Media outlets in LA have frozen out the voice of teachers, painted union members as totally crazy, and refused to take any kind of critical look at this rapid expansion of charter schools despite a growing body of evidence that should give us reason to pause.

The story of Green Dot story is much, much deeper and disturbing than mainstream media outlets let on. In the article below, Emerson Middle School teacher Carolyn Jacobson highlights some of the more questionable aspects of the Green Dot narrative constructed by PR whizzes, corporate honchos, and philanthrocapitalists backing the expansion of charters.


The teacher's words on the topic are also at the link:

"Westwood's Emerson Middle School, where I teach, is the target of a hostile takeover by the most powerful charter school corporation in Los Angeles. We were singled out because Emerson is the neighborhood school for one of the charter revolution leaders, Ben Austin. He is a paid consultant for Green Dot as well as a city official with strong ties to the mayor. It's no coincidence that he is also an organizer of the most vocal parent group advocating privatization of our schools."


Be sure to read all of her words. The article goes deep into the purposes of privatization. I never thought I would hear the words "hostile takeover" used about public schools. I never thought it would happen.

Here is more about that Parents Revolution that she mentions, organized by Green Dot charter schools.

Parents Revolution and Green Dot

One place to start looking at the tremendous growth of these seemingly grass-root groups of parents is in the city of Los Angeles where not only 250 schools have been given the bums rush out of the corridors of public management, but they are due to be thrown into the laps of non-profit outfits like Green Dot Public Schools or Alliance Public Schools, to name just a few. It is truly astounding, for in the case of the non-profit school systems that are emerging, these non-profit EMO’s are bent on creating a new, national retail chain of charter schools with outlets in as many states and school districts they can possibly get their hands on and their tactics are not unlike the ‘grass-root’ town hall health care meetings.

Take the group "Parents Union". Steve Barr, the originator of Green Dot Public Schools, a non-profit EMO out of LA, started Parent Union in Los Angeles a few years ago. According to a document put out by Green Dot in 2008 entitled, Green Dot Public Schools & Los Angeles Parents Union the company said they realized the urban school failure and:

Green Dot responded to this grassroots demand for change by saying, in effect, it’s not that you want a charter school per se, you simply want – and deserve – a high-quality school for the young people in your neighborhoods. Recognizing the need for parents to organize and work collectively to demand high-quality education, Green Dot formed the Los Angeles Parents Union (lapu), a citywide grassroots organization of parents that pushes educators, administrators, and public officials to improve their schools (Green Dot Public Schools & Los Angeles Parents Union, 2008

Green Dot info in pdf format


Sounding like the "grassroots" tea parties to me. Corporations organizing groups to push for a mission. It may not be the same at all...just seems that way.

More information about the public schools being available to outside bidders. It seems such an odd thing to have happen. It appears to be like disaster capitalism, taking advantage of hard times to take over and privatize. But then that is just my opinion.

Public schools to be available to outside bidders.

Up to 250 Los Angeles public schools may be soon available to outside bidders. There are 12 in the original group, more to come.

"Garfield High, which became nationally known as the real-life setting for the film “Stand and Deliver,” will be among the first group of local schools eligible for takeover because of persistent academic failure, a high-level district source has told The Times.

Garfield’s selection means that the nation’s second-largest school system will invite bidders — from inside and outside of the district — to run the East Los Angeles campus of 4,600 students. This “request-for-proposal” process could apply to more than 250 schools under a Board of Education resolution passed last month, but the initial set of schools will number 12, sources said. Included are Jefferson High in Central-Alameda, Lincoln High in Lincoln Heights, Burbank Middle School in Highland Park and Maywood Academy High in the southeast L.A. County city of Maywood.

UPDATED: In addition to the schools named above, the following schools also are on the list: Gardena High in Gardena, San Pedro High in San Pedro, San Fernando Middle School, Carver Middle School in South Park, Griffith Joyner Elementary in Watts, Hillcrest Elementary in Baldwin Hills, Crenshaw, Hyde Park Elementary in Hyde Park.


These public schools are being released "from public governance." It appears Green Dot charter schools have organized teachers and parents already.

And then there is the "Parent University", another laboratory experiment launched by Green Dot. According to Green Dot:

lapu developed an innovative program called “ Parent University ” in which parents gain skills to communicate with teachers and administrators to advocate for their children and use organizing tools such as primers on graduation requirements and school-quality scores, among other supports. The effectiveness of Parent University and the sheer number of parents attending serve as examples of the changing face of human capital in Los Angeles education reform, as parents gain both expertise and a voice to push for positive changes for their children and their communities (ibid).

Green Dot’s organizing efforts make them now poised to seize some of the 250 charter schools that LA has released from public governance. Why did Barr start Parents Union? Simple: to organize parents and teachers so they would rebel against their under-serving public schools and throw their lot in with Green Dot.

Parents University


It's easier to organize when you have corporate big money behind you...much easier than it is to do so as public school parents and teachers. There is no money behind you, there is no media presenting your cause. Little of the information about these issues of hostile takeovers of schools by outside bidders is available on the mainstream news. Most of it is from bloggers, and there is indeed very litte of that.

We used to talk here about the goal of the Bush administration. It was relatively easy to define. Break the back of any government programs by cutting taxes, dismantle public schools by first destroying their reputation, then cutting their funding. Reagan did the first...he effectively smeared public schools. The Bush administration, and this administration are continuing the process by demanding more charter schools. And it becomes a cycle of losing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let me guess, these 12 "right away" schools on the blocks
are not ranked among the worst of the public schools. They don't have the most at risk kids, the lowest scores, the least involved parents?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. have to agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sounds like you guys are agreeing with turning schools over to private companies.
Correct me if I am wrong.

DU has become quite passionate about Gingrich's dream of charter schools now that Arne and Obama are using him to push them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You are wrong I speak for me though....not sure why you viewed it as such
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's why I posted sort of a query....I don't understand the stance of either .
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I took it differently
Edited on Wed Oct-07-09 12:00 AM by Horse with no Name
I think the point being made is that they will auction off the "cream-of-the-crop" schools and leave the others to the state (the state that has no money--no worries though, if the schools have poor test scores, they don't get $$ anyway!!) It is a win/win / HEAVY :sarcasm:

In other words--they will be able to "compare" the magnificence of privatization vs. the scourge of public schools (never mentioning the selection was by design, not by chance).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. That's what I got out of those posts also, Horse with no Name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. I misread it.
Horse with no Name's post clarified it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. yes, I saw that a few posts down. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shireling Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. That's exactly what is being done.
During the last economic collapse, FDR helped to rebuild this nation with a working government for WE THE PEOPLE. Now, we give it away to WE THE CORPORATIONS.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Your tax money will go the Green Dot or another charter schools.
If you read and follow the links, many of the schools are not failing.

BTW what the hell is a failing school? Is it the kids failing, the teachers, the parents, the community?

You must be on board with turning schools over to private companies. You fell for Ronnie Reagan's rants about how bad public schools were.

Only they were really not bad....that study came from a commission appointed by Reagan to privatize schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Sorry you took my query as you did
Frankly am confused why you did. Charters never seem to want the schools that are having troubles as they are hard to spit and polish and use as showcase so they can accumulate other schools.

You have a lot of anger about this issue and rightfully so; turn it against those who are gaming the system and destroying communities along the way, not those who understand the issue and who have been in the trenches fighting Ronald Reagan and his ilk on education, social issues and military build up.

BTW, telling me I fell for Ronald Reagan's schemes is really, really fucking annoying and with the limited opinion I posited, unwarranted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Sorry, when I saw the explanation by Horse with no Name....
I saw where I misread.

Thanks for the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skelly Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
49. The 12 schools
You can check for yourself from the link below (from LA times blog). If these are the "cream" schools, I would sure hate to see the ones at the bottom.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/09/garfield-high-which-became-nationally-known-as-the-real-life-setting-for-the-film-stand-and-deliver-will-be-among-the.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. wow. KR+7, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. When I post about privatizing schools, I know most here disagree now.
To agree would be to go against this administration's policy.

I know the deed is done, all the players are in place.

But the fact that we are losing our public schools can not be shunted aside so easily, and ignored as though it did not matter.

I post about it with a heavy heart, but I will post about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. Thank you for posting. I agree with you.
I am very sad about the continued privatization / piratization of our most cherished public institutions.

There are ways to use nonprofit partners to revitalize education at public schools without going whole hog on privatizing them.

Doesn't that just take education funding away from our already hurting schools and give it to the upstarts? Will we get the same accountability from the privatized schools?

I hate cozying up to Republican ideals because we are too scared to tax the super-rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. This administration is giving Gingrich new life and credibility.
They are using his plans for education which were discredited long ago.

Gingrich on tour with Arne Duncan

Everything Duncan stands for was in Gingrich's plans long ago.

Introduce competition among schools and teachers

We should apply the free enterprise system to our education system by introducing competition among schools, administrators, and teachers. Our educators should be paid based on their performance and held accountable based on clear standards with real consequences. These ideas are designed to stimulate thinking beyond the timid “let’s do more of the same” that has greeted every call for rethinking math and science education.
Source: Gingrich Communications website, www.newt.org Dec 1, 2006

..."Support charters; insist on change for failing schools

We should encourage the spread of public charter schools--one of the happiest new developments on the education scene--so parents, educators, & students working together can enjoy the maximum freedom to explore options and innovations until every child has a genuine opportunity to learn. As a corollary of this, we must identify the worst schools. We should insist on immediate change for bad schools. To start with, there should be no tenure and no binding contracts in the worst 20% of schools.
Source: Lessons Learned the Hard Way, by Newt Gingrich, p.208 Jul 2, 1998

Private scholarships for students at hopeless schools

If there were families left without an acceptable public school, scholarships should be available for them to find a private one. I am a graduate of a public school, as are my wife and two daughters. All of us remain committed to the idea of public education. However, if the available public school is one that gives parents legitimate worry for their children’s future, there ought to be alternative to having to stand helplessly watching an incompetent bureaucracy destroy their children’s lives.
Source: Lessons Learned the Hard Way, by Newt Gingrich, p.209 Jul 2, 1998


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teacher gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. madfloridian
I really appreciate your great posts. Keep it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thank you.
Most don't, but I can't see them dismantle the public schools without speaking out. Probably won't make any difference, but I will know I tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I've got issues with schooling but I am completely opposed to privatization
of public schools. Ironic, perhaps, since my own is in a private school.

But there's a huge difference between non-profit private schools and profit-motivated takeovers of public assets. This is horrible. (If anything, they should turn them over to local neighborhooods perhaps, and stop running them from unnecessarily centralized bureaucracies, IMHO. Put power in the hands of parents, teachers and students.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
48. Oh, they're "non=profit" NOW, like BCBS used to be...
once they have the market share they want, what prevents them from becoming for-profit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teacher gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Most don't?
Your post here http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6692526&mesg_id=6692526 on 'school choice' being code words for privatization got tons of views and 63 recs. I'm sure there were unrecs too but I think there is some support on DU.

Am I naive?

BTW, I couldn't get anything going on this post: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6706106

Anyway, keep up the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teacher gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Oh, and this poll by dinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. That poll is very encouraging. Thanks for sharing the link.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Too late to recommend your post, but I gave a kick.
It's not so much the recommends, but it's the vitriol. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teacher gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. THANKS!
It needs all the help it can get!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. Me Too
I have to agree.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. Self-Delete (Accidental Dupe, Sorry)
Edited on Wed Oct-07-09 03:30 PM by Dinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigan-Arizona Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Madfloridian
I'm not one but I always send your school articles to my daughter & her friend's that are teachers back in Michigan. They find them very informing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. I Pass Them Along to My Colleagues
who are also union members, who vote.:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. That's a nice thing to do.
I have been talking to some teachers lately that I used to teach with. Even the ones teaching still have no clue what is going on. They do not know the differences in the types of schools. They do not realize where so much of the taxpayer money is going.

No wonder teachers are not concerned. So many just don't understand. It was only recently that I started to see what was happening. Since this is Jeb country still, it all seems fine to most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Isn't the mayor behind the LA takeover?New basketball star mayor in Sacramento trying the same scam.
:evilfrown:

with girlfriend Michelle Rhee of DC school scam and Arnie Duncan of national charter privatization scam.

:thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

You can TELL they're wrong because they all use BULLSHIT to promote their business deals. To produce more morons who can't call them on their BULLSHIT

See how that works?


Critical thinking, what's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Yes, it appears you are right. It appears to be Villaraigosa's plan.
Our Democrats are deeply involved in this turnover of public education. It is just heartbreaking to me.

http://4lakidsnews.blogspot.com/2009/09/cortines-villaraigosa-boyarsky-former.html

I had to look it up, but it appears he is leading the way on this.

"Depending on how you look at it, school superintendent Ramon Cortines' schedule for implementing Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s school reform plan is either a great way of getting parents involved or a classic example of bureaucratic delay.

Curious about how the mayor’s plans to turn over 250 Los Angeles public schools to charter organizations, I went to the Los Angeles Unified School District web site and found Cortines’ implementation plan, contained in a letter to teachers and staff.

Amid all the criticism of the district from Villaraigosa and others, people forget that Cortines is the mayor’s guy—or at least was. He was Villaraigosa’s education advisor, and then was sent over to take the reins from a failing superintendent."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R. The slippery slope has turned into a water slide.
The bastards have decided while the people are distracted by health care, war, and jobs that now is a good time to start their takeover. It would help if the administration wasn't helping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm sure that the current state of Collifornya's fiscal crisis is only adding to the problem.
Once the state governments go bankrupt it will be much easier to "persuade" entrepreneurs in the for-profit-non-profit school bidness to take those schools off the hands of the state.

Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. Damn it all. What a complete and utter nightmare. Thank you for posting this; I hate to read it
but it's important to know. Oh, hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. What could possibly go wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. there's real estate involved too. they're going to build new schools for the charters.
On August 25, the Los Angeles Board of Education voted 6 to 1 to turn over more than 250 schools, currently under the jurisdiction of Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), to private corporations to become charter schools. In doing so, the board is moving forward with a right-wing attack on public education that is being pushed at the state-wide level by the Schwarzenegger administration and at the national level by President Obama as part of his overall strategy for education “reform.”

The vote by the LAUSD allows Superintendent Ramon C. Cortines to determine the best method for running 200 currently “failing” schools and 50 new schools slated for opening in the coming years. This decision opens the way for charter school companies to bid for oversight of these campuses. A Los Angeles Times article published on August 26 described the 50 new schools, whose multimillion-dollar facilities will be built with public money, as “the biggest prize” for the charter school companies.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/sep2009/laed-s08.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. "multimillion-dollar facilities will be built with public money, as “the biggest prize”
That's quite a big prize. Thanks for sharing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
32. Union busting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
34. k i c k - back later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
35. K & R &
madfloridian, YOU are the one who should be secretary of education!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shireling Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
42. So sad.
Our government will one day be nothing but a coordinating agency for the ruling corporate world. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
44. first corporations take over health care, then the military, now our schools

Coca Cola will probably take over a few large districts and make it contingent that they serve soda in the lunchroom.

I think they call it a 'public school' system for a reason - let's not change that for the sake of corporate greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
45. Madfloridian, you have been in the forefront of this issue and
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 01:20 AM by Nikki Stone1
I am glad you are still putting all this up. I used to teach in LA Unified. My old school is not yet on the list, but it is bound to be at some point. The corporate movement seems to be pinpointing the schools with the fewest white students, at least for now.

If this were being done by W, this board would be going nuts. But because the Obama administration is actually SUPPORTING this (through Arne Duncan) there are many who are keeping silent. This is just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
46. 20 years from now we'll be fighting to have Education Reform have a 'public option'
This is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
47. big mistake - this is what is behind NCLB and breaking the unions n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
50. The organizations that were pushing for these kinds of ideas were
networking since the 90s.

It begins with someone from an organization who claims to be non-partisan because of their organization is a non-profit. In the nineties, for example, that was James Madison Institute. A representative would visit all the little known County committees in the State that had long reaches inside their own counties and they would give them a speech about their mission. Essentially, influence public policy. In the nineties, charter schools and voucher were top on their list.

Then, during the speech, they would tell everyone about the other organizations they're affiliated with. About seven of them:

Heartland Institute of Chicago
Georgia Public Policy Center
South Carolina Public Policy Center
Alabama Family Alliance
Manhattan Institute
Clermont Institute -- CA
Pioneer Institute -- Denver

He said they got together two or three times a years to share ideas.

So, how can they call themselves non-political, if they're consorting with nothing but conservative, extremist groups?

OH, and they would also work closely with the Heritage Foundation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kleec Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
51. Thank you
Thank you Madfloridian for all of your attention and efforts for the teachers, and students. The takeover of corporations of schools is a shame and a loss for all of us. My kids all graduated from a public school with the kind of education they needed in order to further educate themselves. There is absolutely no need for the private sector to step in as far as I am concerned. We have qualified people within our schools already, they just need the support of our government to do their jobs. We don't need to use our kids to line the pockets of corporate!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmorlan1 Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
52. Privatizing Public Schools is Wrong
Thank you so much for posting this. This is just ghastly! I guess the fascists won't be happy until they control everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. I much agree. It is just wrong.
There is no excuse for doing it.

We could fix our public schools instead of taking money away from them.

It's a sad thing for our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC