Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House liberals float bill to bar 'surge' of troops for Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:41 PM
Original message
House liberals float bill to bar 'surge' of troops for Afghanistan

House liberals float bill to bar 'surge' of troops for Afghanistan
By Michael O'Brien - 10/04/09 02:03 PM ET


Nearly two dozen House liberals have signed onto a bill introduced this past week that would prohibit an increase of troops in Afghanistan.

A bill introduced by Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) on Thursday would bar funding to increase the troop level in Afghanistan beyond its current level.

Lee and 21 lawmakers -- largely from the liberal Congressional Progressive Caucus -- introduced the bill, H.R. 3699 on Thursday.

The legislation comes as President Barack Obama and leaders in Congress weigh a request from Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the commander of troops in Afghanistan, for as many as 40,000 new troops to bolster the eight-year-long military engagement in the region.

“History tells us that there will not be a military-first solution to the situation in Afghanistan," Lee told the Redding News Review. “Open-ended military intervention in Afghanistan is not in our national security interest and will only continue to give resonance to insurgent recruiters painting pictures of foreign occupation to a new generation."

more...

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/61543-house-liberals-float-bill-to-bar-surge-for-afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just hope there is no conflict between the President
and Congress. Dissension within our party would not get anything done. The President is the final say on how we approach AfPak and we must support his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh, there probably will be conflict if everyone is doing their jobs.
I just hope for civil discourse. Both sides could learn a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Co-Sponsors
Rep Clarke, Yvette D. - 10/1/2009
Rep Cleaver, Emanuel - 10/1/2009
Rep Cohen, Steve - 10/1/2009
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. - 10/1/2009
Rep Edwards, Donna F. - 10/1/2009
Rep Ellison, Keith - 10/1/2009
Rep Filner, Bob - 10/1/2009
Rep Grayson, Alan - 10/1/2009
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. - 10/1/2009
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. - 10/1/2009
Rep Honda, Michael M. - 10/1/2009
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila - 10/1/2009
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. - 10/1/2009
Rep Lewis, John - 10/1/2009
Rep McDermott, Jim - 10/1/2009
Rep McGovern, James P. - 10/1/2009
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete - 10/1/2009
Rep Towns, Edolphus - 10/1/2009
Rep Waters, Maxine - 10/1/2009
Rep Watson, Diane E. - 10/1/2009
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. - 10/1/2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good to hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. The tide is turning against this lousy, useless, war. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zix Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC