Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holy Joe: "Disappointed with Democrats who would not

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:21 PM
Original message
Holy Joe: "Disappointed with Democrats who would not
work with Bush in a bipartisan way."

God. This piece of crap is blaming the Democrats for not working with Bush, his gripe with the resolution against the Iraq War is that it will condemn the mission that General Petraeus says he needs. Bush says he will go forward no matter what the Congress says, he fears that it can be harmful to our troops.

Can't Connecticut recall this Bush-licker suck up???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how the Conn Dems that VOTED for him over Ned
are feeling now.. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I hope they are watching FoxNews right now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Holy Joe said he might vote Republican in 2008
no matter whether they are Democrats, Republicans or Independents.

He says he agrees with Dems on domestic policy, with Republicans on foreign policy.

He just said he might vote Republican in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is nothing but excrement.
As vile, if not more vile, than BushCo. I hate him with every fiber of my being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I do too. I hate him more than I hate the worst Repukes.
I cannot BELIEVE that piece of crap was Dem. V.P. nominee a mere six years ago. It's mind boggling. I cannot even post my true thoughts about what I want to happen to Joe Lieberman. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. w/o joe we do not have the congress - get over it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It seems to me that we don't have it with him.
Do you really think this cocksucker is going to vote with us on anything important? He'll side with the Chimp on anything he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. no we don't expect him to vote with us but we have pelosi and heads
of committees because dems control - if Joe went neutral like Jeffords of VT did we lose that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You mean Harry Reid
Lieberman is in the Senate, not the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Has he ever complained about Bush/Republicans not being bipartisan? ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Funny - I had the same thought. I can't recall a moment since about
2002 when he did say something mean about bushco cuz they wouldn't give docs per energy meetings and Enron. But that was the last time... I really think he is petty - and vindictive - he blames folks for not supporting him as heir apparent for the dem nomination - and then for lack of support in his senate primary - he can't, for a second, look in the mirror and take any responsibility for the lack of support. So instead he has let this self-righteous "I am right and every last one of you is Wrong!!!!" sentiment that seems to fester and at least sound (if it isn't for real) toxic. He is just a hair shy of the frothy/Wild-eyed performance of Zell at the 04 Repub Convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes. they CAN recall him
in SIX LONG YEARS !!

WTG, CT :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC